Jump to content

Nashville International Airport Development thread


Lexy

Recommended Posts


On 12/26/2023 at 10:34 AM, Nathan_in_DC said:

I always forget just how small the passenger numbers are for Dulles considering its hub status for United and international destinations on every continent except for Australia and Antarctica. DCA, a MUCH smaller airport with no international service other than Canada, has higher passenger numbers. No doubt it's because Dulles is an hour outside of downtown DC with traffic (or on Metro) whereas DCA is 15 minutes, but it's still surprising to me just how underutilized IAD is.

For domestic flights, DCA and BWI are more convenient than Dulles to the DMV populous that lives in DC and Maryland.    For Northern VA residents living in Alexandria and Arlington, DCA is also more convenient.  Even with the Metro Silver Line now stopping at Dulles it's still a long haul for most people.  Flights out of Dulles also tend to be more expensive than DCA and BWI.  Dulles is a bit better than BWI with international flights.  But if you're willing to do a layover in JFK as an example you might find less expensive flights to Europe.  

I live between BWI and DCA, so I tend to use both of those airports far more than I do Dulles.  When I lived in Alexandria, VA I was only about 10 minutes from DCA, so that was always my go to airport unless BWI or Dulles had better flights and airfares.  BWI would typically be better and quite frankly from Alexandria the distance wasn't that much different than Dulles. 

With Southwest flying out of DCA now, that has helped to drive down airfares for other airlines operating out of DCA.  The last two times that I flew to BNA, I actually flew Delta from DCA.  Delta now offers two or three daily non-stop flights from DCA to BNA.  The Delta flights in the past year have also been cheaper than Southwest flights out of both BWI and DCA.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, PillowTalk4 said:

For domestic flights, DCA and BWI are more convenient than Dulles to the DMV populous that lives in DC and Maryland.    For Northern VA residents living in Alexandria and Arlington, DCA is also more convenient.  Even with the Metro Silver Line now stopping at Dulles it's still a long haul for most people.  Flights out of Dulles also tend to be more expensive than DCA and BWI.  Dulles is a bit better than BWI with international flights.  But if you're willing to do a layover in JFK as an example you might find less expensive flights to Europe.  

I live between BWI and DCA, so I tend to use both of those airports far more than I do Dulles.  When I lived in Alexandria, VA I was only about 10 minutes from DCA, so that was always my go to airport unless BWI or Dulles had better flights and airfares.  BWI would typically be better and quite frankly from Alexandria the distance wasn't that much different than Dulles. 

With Southwest flying out of DCA now, that has helped to drive down airfares for other airlines operating out of DCA.  The last two times that I flew to BNA, I actually flew Delta from DCA.  Delta now offers two or three daily non-stop flights from DCA to BNA.  The Delta flights in the past year have also been cheaper than Southwest flights out of both BWI and DCA.  

I live about 10 minutes from DCA now and it's pretty great having an airport so close with such a convenient Metro connection. Great for flying to BNA, too....5 flights on AA, 3 Delta, and 4 SWA gives lots of options on timing and fares. Like I mentioned initially, I doubt I'll ever actually take the Metro to Dulles...it's such a long ride and it dumps you out pretty far from the terminal. And honestly, if I'm flying out of Dulles it's probably for work anyway, which means I can just claim the cab fare for reimbursement. I still wish that WMATA hadn't cheaped out and built it so that they could have alternating express service to DCA after the split from the Orange line. Dulles is really only convenient for people in the east half of Loudon County and the west half of Fairfax County.

I've only flown out of BWI once, going to London, because fares on Air Canada (BWI-YYZ-LHR) were substantially cheaper than the flights from Dulles.  Took the MARC train to get there. It was convenient-ish...but the train frequencies made it a challenge.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NashRugger said:

So let's carve this up for a minute. Obviously these are desired routes, either by the airport and/or passenger inputs.

For Asia/Pacific: Sydney & Seoul are definitely not going to be happening anytime soon. Tokyo is probably the farthest that's even remotely attainable. Honolulu is questionable with whatever is going to happen or not happen with the potential merger of Alaska & Hawaiian. 

For Europe: Dublin may be in the deck next to show face, if articles are to be believed. Paris or Frankfurt are my next logical places, with Paris getting a slight edge given the strong Delta presence, thus either being Delta or Air France metal flying with the SkyTeam alliance. Amsterdam is in such a weird flux with the Dutch government attempting to reduce capacity and/or potentially impose new fees on int'l connections at Schipol Airport. Reykjavik, while it seems nice, Iceland would be a seasonal gain at best but it also peaked at a tourist hotspot a few years ago and has actually declined lately. 

We'll see what shakes out and hopefully one or two new European routes get announced next year, but I have my doubts without significant incentives. Thanks RDU to the latter piece. 

Agreed.  It's nice to see that they're shooting for the stars, I guess, but it seems like it'd be more practical to secure small potatoes international routes, relatively speaking, like Nassau or Mexico City before going after flights to Australia and South Korea.  I mean New York and Chicago don't even have direct flights to Australia.  One step at a time, BNA, one step at a time.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/31/2023 at 10:20 PM, BnaBreaker said:

Agreed.  It's nice to see that they're shooting for the stars, I guess, but it seems like it'd be more practical to secure small potatoes international routes, relatively speaking, like Nassau or Mexico City before going after flights to Australia and South Korea.  I mean New York and Chicago don't even have direct flights to Australia.  One step at a time, BNA, one step at a time.  

New York does have service to Auckland and Qantas plans on a nonstop to Sydney likely next year, just a touch too far currently until they get the a 350-10 starting next year. Chicago also has Auckland and Qantas had Brisbane planned before Covid, so those are coming in a close frame of time.

 

Back to BNA. I could see Nassau getting added by SWA in the future, but they're currently only seasonal to BWI and about to swap FLL to MCO this year. I do think Aeromexico, Viva Aerobus, or Volaris will enter the market with regularly scheduled service at some point very soon. Mexico City, Monterrey, or even both could be in the cards now that Mexico is back to a favorable view of the FAA and adding more routes in the US. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.