Jump to content

Fairgrounds Speedway Racetrack expansion to 30,000 seats


markhollin

Recommended Posts


  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

The Governor's new budget has $17 million in grants earmarked to help prepare the Fairgrounds Speedway for potential NASCAR racing. 

More behind the Nashville Post paywall here:

https://www.nashvillepost.com/politics/state/lee-proposes-millions-for-nascar-titans/article_100a8d74-af96-11ec-be75-0f0a7076dee3.html


And at NBJ here:

https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2022/03/30/nashville-fairgrounds-speedway-could-see-17-milli.html

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheSound said:

And having big Nascar events on the edge of the urban core of the city will make for great television and being able to show off the city.  Not many tracks like that currently.  I bet the events here will get sizable ratings.

Do we each get a check for good tv ratings?  Is Nashville hurting for exposure?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize that’s a controversial statement, but Nashville already has enough low-brow entertainment. Let Charlotte be the NASCAR city. I think Nashville should be leaning more into the historic “Athens of the South” moniker, in order to continue attracting Oracles / Amazons. 
 

What if we built a new performing arts center on the river? Or a museum of modern art? NASCAR is an outdated, dying form of entertainment. Whatever they build will be a wasteland in 30 years.

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, titanhog said:

It will just continue to be an old track with local and regional races instead of the ONE NASCAR top level event they’ll have there each year.

Yep, driving electric vehicles!! Even NASCAR has said they will be electric within the next 10 years, maybe sooner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, titanhog said:

It’s not as if this track is going to suddenly disappear and there be no racing at that track if SMI doesn’t do the upgrades.

SMI isn't "doing" any  "upgrades".  SMI wants Metro (and the State) to pay for a whole new track and facility.   SMI will then run a race or races (at whatever level they choose) and do other undefined things which they really don't want to talk about publicly.  SMI won't guarantee the cost of the facility and can walk away or switch races to the Wilson County track  they own whenever they want, leaving behind an empty track with no NASCAR or higher level races and a big debt.  That  all sounds like some pretty elitist, rich guy entitlement to me..... 

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Melrose said:

SMI isn't "doing" any  "upgrades".  SMI wants Metro (and the State) to pay for a whole new track and facility.   SMI will then run a race or races (at whatever level they choose) and do other undefined things which they really don't want to talk about publicly.  SMI won't guarantee the cost of the facility and can walk away or switch races to the Wilson County track  they own whenever they want, leaving behind an empty track with no NASCAR or higher level races and a big debt.  That  all sounds like some pretty elitist, rich guy entitlement to me..... 

I don’t think TH was saying that there weren’t elitist elements within nascar (there are elitist elements in any organization that involves as much money as nascar), only the OP’s statement that Nashville doesn’t need any more “redneck tourism,” which many of us took as classist and anti-rural/Southern. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, titanhog said:

I just believe you’re misinformed.  That track has been here longer than any of us on this site have been on Earth.  They’ve had racing there continually for decades.  It’s not as if this track is going to suddenly disappear and there be no racing at that track if SMI doesn’t do the upgrades.  It will just continue to be an old track with local and regional races instead of the ONE NASCAR top level event they’ll have there each year.

It’s as if people think the city is debating bringing racing to Nashville when IT’S ALREADY HERE AND HAS BEEN HERE FOR DECADES.

As far as “low-brow” entertainment…that’s unbelievably elitist talk. 

Things change. What has been will not always be.  There used to not be a soccer stadium and now there IS. If it makes financial sense to upgrade the track then we should do it. If it makes sense to demolish the track we should do it. Clearly the mayor's office and SMI are having trouble coming to an agreement, I am purely guessing that SMI wants to put as little money as possible into it and not guarantee debt and overages. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Samsonh just said is true, to elaborate further there used to be a FAIR at the FAIRGROUNDS, there no longer is. There used to be vibrant neighborhoods were interstates now exist…etc. things change unfortunately even treasured things change. There used to be car dealerships along Broadway, but we all are hoping that’s about to change, for the better. Point is , if it’s not financially beneficial to keep this track operating, then it’s in the best interests of Metro to replace it with something that is. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a race fan and car junkie , just looking at it with my head not my heart. What’s best for the whole of the city , not just us race fans. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, natethegreat said:

I think Nashville should be leaning more into the historic “Athens of the South” moniker, in order to continue attracting Oracles / Amazons. 

So if Nashville doesn't do the historic "Athens of the South" moniker, it won't continue to attract Oracle or Amazon. So why are Amazon and Oracle here?

3 hours ago, natethegreat said:

What if we built a new performing arts center on the river? Or a museum of modern art? 

There's already a performing arts center and an art museum.

Edited by Licec
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm an NFL fan and even though the NFL is profitable (like Nascar), I'm not sure if a new Titans stadium is wildly beneficial to the city as a whole, but alas we are more and more likely going to spend around 10x as much money as the racetrack is wanting. I agree that SMI should absolutely be held to lease conditions that would not leave the city in a lurch, but I do believe that having a big time race at the track will be good for the city. Just look at how successful having the SRX race here last summer was. Largest crowd since the 70s!

The thing that makes the racetrack a bit trickier than the MLS or NFL stadium deals is the city owns the structure and is not leasing it to SMI, but rather hiring them as an operator/manager. A GM of a honky tonk is not going to pay for renovations to the honky tonk, but rather the leaseholder or owner will do that. Nascar is starting negotiations on a new TV deal (their current $4.4 billion deal signed in 2013 expires at the end of the 2023 race season) and they have been exploring new models in how to structure the deal, much like their title sponsorship model has been changing. The race is still great exposure for the city and with the direction Nascar has been going, the organization has almost been more active in their DEI efforts than some other sports (granted they had probably the furthest to go).

Things change, yes. But the racetrack is a viable exposure/tourist tool for the city that requires less investment than the billionaire Titans/NFL. 

I'm a country music loving, pickup truck driving, creative moderate from Boston remember haha. Things are not as always as they seem. Nascar (and the racetrack) to me is definitely one of those.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bos2Nash said:

The thing that makes the racetrack a bit trickier than the MLS or NFL stadium deals is the city owns the structure and is not leasing it to SMI, but rather hiring them as an operator/manager.

The City owns the soccer stadium and is leasing it to Nashville SC (with Nashville SC guaranteeing the full stadium cost),  and they would be likewise entering into a lease with SMI.  The problem is that only the big 1 or 2 NASCAR (or just below level)  races that SMI is maybe going to bring,  are supposedly big enough to be  able to cover the millions in revenue needed to cover the debt for the brand new facility.  Without those big races, the local and regional racing can't cover  5% of that debt and Metro can't just add a NASCAR race,  those are all controlled by SMI or NASCAR. 

 Bottom line is if the big 1 or 2 SMI races are truly such a revenue bonanza,  there is no reason SMI shouldn't be willing to guarantee the full facility debt.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.