Jump to content

Charlotte Gateway Station and Railroad Improvements


dubone

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, CLT2014 said:

I blame both the city and the state. The state should not be involved though. I don't like a representative from Shelby telling me what I can or cannot vote for in my county to score political wins. They don't live here. They don't know what is best for us. 

On the flipside... maybe the city shouldn't have even bothered with a transit plan knowing the state is not interested in giving Charlotte a political win when they can use that to their advantage. Just a waste of time.  

I think the relationship between Charlotte and Raleigh politicians is a bit more nuanced than that.  Every time I hear the mayor discuss the transit plan, she sounds obscurely high-level.  The story she delivers isn't very compelling at all. 

Was CATS to be the primary "Executor" of the transit plan once approved?  Well for much of the time since the so-called transit plan was formulated, the organization running transit was a dysfunctional and mismanaged mess not even keeping up with the basics of a maintenance schedule on its fleet.  And yet we wanted a generational transit investment to fall under its purview? 

Yes, John Lewis is gone and I'm gathering that Cagle has made strides to course-correct, but Cagle is an interim head, right?  I'd heard from folks that CATS had been systemically damaged and deficient up until recently.  So how could this massive "plan," again, generational investment north of $13 billion, have been ready for primetime with the State Legislature given all the other noise and given that the governance framework of the agency with responsibility for carrying it out isn't even stable?

Why should a conservative state legislature be gung-ho for this?  Why even would a democratic legislature be on board?  The political realities of this state are what they are and I'm not sure why we ever thought this transit plan could be implemented in a vacuum.  And frankly, is CATS now under stable and strategic leadership?  Can we even pitch this to the state without a good answer to this question?  

Edited by RANYC
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, jthomas said:

IMG_0179.thumb.jpeg.a52cd3f00387c5657dc1fbf7488206ea.jpeg

IF (and clearly that's a big if) anyone cared about the intercity rail portion of this project, you could build a sidewalk and dropoff lane in the space available now, knock out the panels circled in red, and start running trains uptown in a matter of weeks. Heck, you wouldn't even have to close the current station if it was important to have station facilities somewhere - trains could stop at both stations. Just give people the ability to get on/off the train uptown if they want!

Move this concept one block northeast or across Trade Street along Wilkes Place and you have the actual temporary station seriously considered by Amtrak.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RANYC said:

Why should a conservative state legislature be gung-ho for this? 

because denser cities that offer multiple modes of transportation are much more productive places. Not to mention that are much less costly to operate and maintain than sprawling, auto dependent places. These are not controversial or uncertain processes, the productivity-density link has been proven many times over. If we had a legislature that was AT ALL interested in evidence, they would be doing everything they could to allow Charlotte and Raleigh to expand sustainably.

1 hour ago, RANYC said:

 I've been under the assumption we'd instead have a Silver Line Phase I, half the size of what's currently proposed, with a Silver Line Extension coming down the road.  Phase I could get you from Oakhurst to the Airport, perhaps?

While a truncated Silver Line makes a ton of sense from an effective transit perspective, it just won't fly with the folks at the MTC who have the power to approve such a thing. Since the outlying towns have voting power on the MTC, and they have been (justifiably) bithcing about the absence of the Red Line for nearly two decades, they are never going to approve spending county-wide sales tax dollars on a project that is entirely within Charlotte.  It is completely true that LRT should not be used as commuter rail, but unfortunately the way we have set up governance for CATS, LRT that does not reach at least one of the outlying towns in the county just aint gonna happen. (and this is why the city had to pay for the Gold Line from its own money).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kermit said:

because denser cities that offer multiple modes of transportation are much more productive places. Not to mention that are much less costly to operate and maintain than sprawling, auto dependent places. These are not controversial or uncertain processes, the productivity-density link has been proven many times over. If we had a legislature that was AT ALL interested in evidence, they would be doing everything they could to allow Charlotte and Raleigh to expand sustainably.

While a truncated Silver Line makes a ton of sense from an effective transit perspective, it just won't fly with the folks at the MTC who have the power to approve such a thing. Since the outlying towns have voting power on the MTC, and they have been (justifiably) bithcing about the absence of the Red Line for nearly two decades, they are never going to approve spending county-wide sales tax dollars on a project that is entirely within Charlotte.  It is completely true that LRT should not be used as commuter rail, but unfortunately the way we have set up governance for CATS, LRT that does not reach at least one of the outlying towns in the county just aint gonna happen. (and this is why the city had to pay for the Gold Line from its own money).

I'm talking about doing both the Red Line & a truncated Silver Line, with Silver Line going from something like 26-miles to a mere 12 (Oakhurst to Airport), so maybe just $2.5 billion - Silver Line Phase I, if we can get a handle on the per mile light rail costs.  Red Line was estimated at shy of 700 million in 2021, mark that up to a billion.  So 3.5 billion for train, and the balance on roads and an acceleration of the greenway system so that expanded greenway designs across the city are interconnected and accessible to everyone and perhaps direct everyone to the greenway system for protected bike mobility instead of bike lanes adjacent to pickups & SUVs?  Throw in there a Greenway GPS as well so tourists know how to get to different landmarks in town just using our 300+ mile network of greenways.

In the interim, put a very simple open air train Amtrak station near Gateway station in Uptown and give folks a stop option there.  I personally have a hunch that any sort of Amtrak stop option in Uptown will drive even more ridership into Charlotte, but it's just a supposition based on anecdotal evidence.

Oh yeah, and in the spirit of anticipatory planning, make sure Operation Trio at the temporary Gateway Amtrak station is ready at the outset. 

Edited by RANYC
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm highly suspicious of Norfolk Southern's openness to discuss use of tracks.  The city had better pounce as much as it can and exploit this window.  A democratic (Biden) administration overseeing the STB and DOT might be behind the scenes pushing railroads to work with local communities on supporting alternative mobility goals.  Should we go back to a conservative executive branch, perhaps we'll see a pretty abrupt tone shift.  I think the letter to Charlotte might have been mere lip service to keep Buttigieg and others off their case.  We need to be vocal and visible in our attempts to advance the project during this window.  

https://www.stb.gov/news-communications/latest-news/pr-24-04-2/

If you follow that link, it's a news release from the STB on hearings where Amtrak is arguing to be allowed to use freight lines owned by Norfolk & CSX to expand intercity rail service.  I know Amtrak is Amtrak, but anyone know if this is what the Northeastern Cities do when they want more use of freight lines for commuters...lobby STB?  Are we applying pressure to all of our leverage points to get things moving?

Edited by RANYC
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, RANYC said:

I'm highly suspicious of Norfolk Southern's openness to discuss use of tracks.  The city had better pounce as much as it can and exploit this window.  A democratic (Biden) administration overseeing the STB and DOT might be behind the scenes pushing railroads to work with local communities on supporting alternative mobility goals.  Should we go back to a conservative executive branch, perhaps we'll see a pretty abrupt tone shift.  I think the letter to Charlotte might have been mere lip service to keep Buttigieg and others off their case.  We need to be vocal and visible in our attempts to advance the project during this window. 

FWIW yesterday the WSJ had a story on an activist investor who has amassed $1billion of NS stock that just announced they will push for the ouster of the current NS CEO and push for the railroad to be operated more "efficiently" -- largely focused on cost reductions (the stock was up 9% yesterday on this news). Obviously there are few specifics in the article, but I would certainly see this pressure as a new reason for NS to divest themselves of the O-Line tracks since they are a) unlikely to ever be profitably be used by the railroad, and b) represent some liability to NS. This is certainly not a climate where NS can think about paying the costs necessary to reactivate the line or rationalize holding the mothballed line on the books for the benefit of NCRR renegotiations in 25+ years.

The stars may be aligning for the Red Line, Charlotte just has to find the money.

https://www.wsj.com/business/deals/ancora-led-group-takes-aim-at-norfolk-southern-pushes-to-oust-ceo-shaw-dbd029f7

Edited by kermit
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kermit said:

FWIW

FWIW yesterday the WSJ had a story on an activist investor who has amassed $1billion of NS stock that just announced they will push for the ouster of the current NS CEO and push for the railroad to be operated more "efficiently" -- largely focused on cost reductions (the stock was up 9% yesterday on this news). Obviously there are few specifics in the article, but I would certainly see this pressure as a new reason for NS to divest themselves of the O-Line tracks since they are a) unlikely to ever be profitably be used by the railroad, and b) represent some liability to NS. This is certainly not a climate where NS can think about paying the costs necessary to reactivate the line or rationalize holding the mothballed line on the books for the benefit of NCRR renegotiations in 25+ years.

The stars may be aligning for the Red Line, Charlotte just has to find the money.

https://www.wsj.com/business/deals/ancora-led-group-takes-aim-at-norfolk-southern-pushes-to-oust-ceo-shaw-dbd029f7

True, and with new requirements likely coming in the wake of the East Palestine crisis, not sure NS will want to hold on to non-core rail line assets given rail will need capital investments to come into conformance.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years ago the state gave counties the option to have a referendum to have a 1/4th cent sales tax increase. Did Mecklenburg  County ever do that?  If not, it could be a small source of revenue for the rail lines. Add this to some other creative options and they may generate enough revenue to start the Red line, some road improvements and maybe a short piece of the Silver line.   Another piece of legislation, Senate bill 696 titled Local Option Sales Tax Flexibility was considered in the 2023 session. It would give some counties the option of adding an additional 1/4 or 1/2 cent sales tax by  referendum.  Last I could find, it was referred to a committee on Rules and Operations  of the Senate. It needs to be resurrected.   In a related matter that is critical, the NC speaker of the House who is from Cleveland Co, a man who has stood in the way of Mecklenburg County and Charlotte getting the 1 cent sales tax referendum approval in that branch, as you know is running for the congressional seat in the newly redrawn 14th district. This district now includes part of North Mecklenburg County and Lake Norman towns and cities. While this district was designed to lean red, this guy has been the poster child of the rural urban divide, and of despising the urban areas to the fullest extent possible to provide for rural areas. He is not a person who will or should champion the urban needs of Gaston, Lincoln, Mecklenburg and the other rapidly urbanizing areas of the 14th. His vile actions against urban areas should be blasted across the district to the point that he either loses or will have to cut a deal ie approve  or compromise on the 1 cent tax and support a referendum to get elected. He needs the support of the Northern Mecklenburg cities and towns, but unless he can find more state money, the 1 cent tax referendum needs to be approved by the NCGA  to fund a Red Line which now may cost up to a couple of billions.  Trying to get the favor of the voters is the reason he found a few crumbs for improvements on the I85-485 interchange. He needs to painfully learn that is not enough to buy this district or be elected to represent people he has in the past treated like they were his enemies. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Eastern said:

A few years ago the state gave counties the option to have a referendum to have a 1/4th cent sales tax increase. Did Mecklenburg  County ever do that?  If not, it could be a small source of revenue for the rail lines. 

While my memory on it is fuzzy, I do remember two reasons why Meck has not sought this quarter cent. First, our pre-existing 1/2 cent transit tax may may mean  that Meck is ineligible to use this sales tax increment (but I am not 100% on this). Second, it was generally accepted that 1/4 cent was not enough for any workable transit expansion, and there was a hesitance to establish several different taxes for transit (any referendum would face the question from voters of “what about that sales tax hike we voted for last year”)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the cap on sales tax in NC is 7.5%, so meck can raise taxes by 1/4 of a percent. I do not think the GOP would ever allow the county to raise sales taxes beyond this point. although it would not be a popular decision, property taxes would be easier to increase to fund the transit plan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/4/2024 at 1:22 PM, Norm2 said:

Looks like the cap on sales tax in NC is 7.5%, so meck can raise taxes by 1/4 of a percent. I do not think the GOP would ever allow the county to raise sales taxes beyond this point. although it would not be a popular decision, property taxes would be easier to increase to fund the transit plan.

Its certainly more feasible in the sense that we have permission to do it. However, this increase would be substantial ( a couple hundred dollars per average house per year), and very visible (property tax bills get paid once per year). No politician voting to that would ever get reelected.

IMO since Mecklenburg is responsible for 21% of the state's GDP (but is a bit less than 10% of the state's population), the state should be working their ass off to make sure Mecklenburg sees enough investment in infrastructure to prevent the state's most productive land from clogging its economic arteries with auto dependent growth. The state really should be paying for transit, not county residents. Unfortunately the state decided to essentially zero out their contribution to transit. 

I am certain we don't receive state investments worth anywhere near 21% (or even 10%) of the state's budget.

image.png.7cffcf5c7c8b186b224c28f1e4f2c779.png

Edit: The current NC budget is $30 billion. 21% of that is $6.3 billion

Edited by kermit
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things are moving along faster than you guys would imagine with the red line acquisition but no one seems to know why they are just now willing to bargain and I think any optimism has come with a heavy dose of suspicion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kermit said:

Its certainly more feasible in the sense that we have permission to do it. However, this increase would be substantial ( a couple hundred dollars per average house per year), and very visible (property tax bills get paid once per year). No politician voting to that would ever get reelected.

IMO since Mecklenburg is responsible for 21% of the state's GDP (but is a bit less than 10% of the state's population), the state should be working their ass off to make sure Mecklenburg sees enough investment in infrastructure to prevent the state's most productive land from clogging its economic arteries with auto dependent growth. The state really should be paying for transit, not county residents. I am certain we don't receive 21% (or even 10%) of the state's revenue.

image.png.7cffcf5c7c8b186b224c28f1e4f2c779.png

Edit: The current NC budget is $30 billion. 21% of that is $6.3 billion

and that's just the county, the metro brings in another $70B

Edited by CLT Development
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MothBeast said:

Things are moving along faster than you guys would imagine with the red line acquisition but no one seems to know why they are just now willing to bargain and I think any optimism has come with a heavy dose of suspicion.

There was a report to congress in July 2019 written by the federal railroad administration of the US DOT.  The report provides guidelines for shared use of freight infrastructure, shared between freight and passenger operations.

In the report, the railroad passengers association suggests a grant program that acquires abandoned or underutilized rail corridors from freight operators. 

Im wondering if there’s something in the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that’s creating incentives for freight operators to share infrastructure for passenger rail?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Norm2 said:

Looks like the cap on sales tax in NC is 7.5%, so meck can raise taxes by 1/4 of a percent. I do not think the GOP would ever allow the county to raise sales taxes beyond this point. although it would not be a popular decision, property taxes would be easier to increase to fund the transit plan.

DC bizjournals article last week on how the commercial tax base is in a free-fall there because of rapidly falling commercial real estate values.  Taxable assessed value there has fallen by $12 billion in two years, with the city’s CFO telling council that annual tax receipts from commercial real estate likely to drop by $250 to $300 million annually.  

He goes on to say that 2025 budget will be the most difficult to craft since the Great Recession.  I know real estate pros are addressing Charlotte council about how high vacancies are, but have we modeled this out at all?  We’re gonna need to raise property taxes just to balance the existing budget.  Doubt there will be appetite to raise it more just to fund the silver line as it is currently designed.  

Anyone know about land use taxes and whether the dire situation in commercial real estate would be a good time to explore the concept as a new revenue stream for cities, or if it’s actually an even worse time to explore it?

 

Edited by RANYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off topic but perhaps of interest here:

The February CAPT Newsletter mentions that Wilmington International Airport (ILM) could be he first in NC to be connected to passenger rail. The Raleigh-Wilmington tracks run past the airport entrance and stop locations are being discussed as part of the route planning process now. It was mentioned that ILM currently does not have any flight connections to RDU (but an RDU stop is still not on anyone's books)

I would bet on Raleigh-Wilmington rail to happen before Charlotte-Kings Mountain rail.

RDU and PTI rail connections are also theoretically possible (along with GSP and ATL)

Edited by kermit
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2024 at 6:27 AM, RANYC said:

There was a report to congress in July 2019 written by the federal railroad administration of the US DOT.  The report provides guidelines for shared use of freight infrastructure, shared between freight and passenger operations.

In the report, the railroad passengers association suggests a grant program that acquires abandoned or underutilized rail corridors from freight operators. 

Im wondering if there’s something in the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that’s creating incentives for freight operators to share infrastructure for passenger rail?

It’s pretty simple, passenger rail upgrades also mean upgrades to the freight infrastructure. Freight railroads can’t be a grant applicant or recipient for most federal programs but they can immensely benefit from them if there is a public entity involved and willing to be an applicant.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the early 2000s I put together a proposal for commuter rail in eastern NC from Wilson to Goldsboro via Raleigh.  NCRR, which owns the line between Raleigh and Goldsboro was on board.  NS owns the line to Wilson through Knightdale, Wendell, and Zebulon.  Before the proposal was hijacked by an incompetent politician and driven into the ground, NS entertained the idea of operating passenger service on their line in exchange for development rights along the corridor and public investment in improving the corridor.  Since the goal of the project was economic development (not reducing car trips) and to encourage compact, walkable development in outlying towns - the opportunity was real.  The way we got to that point wasn't by telling NS they had to do this or that but by engaging them in the vision and the role they could play in it.  The project/vision was called Eastrans - and until the politicians got involved, it could have actually worked.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.