Jump to content

Charlotte Center City Streetcar Network


Sabaidee

Recommended Posts

[to Piedmont] Yes, but a Cedar Street routing would make a Lakewood spur _incredibly_ cheap. As I frequently say here, Seversville has the potential to be a slightly smaller and cooler Southend and this would make it a perfect for TIF.

Unfortunately the line on the new map appears to be nothing more than the original 2030 plan idea (although I think the explicit choice of Cedar Street is new). One thing I prematurely wonder about is where the West line would terminate. It makes little sense to me to turn the vehicles at Cedar and Trade (thus forcing nearly everyone into 2 or 3 or 4 seat rides to the airport). Running the West Line through to Plaza / post-Eastland would certainly pick up more riders and increase frequencies on the Gold Line route. Turing West Line trans at the CTC feels weird and wasteful and I have a hard time imagining they would accommodate turn arounds there. 

[EDIT: No reason that a 'streetcar' could not be put into dedicated ROW on the South side or center of Wilkenson]

Edited by kermit
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hmm the Hawthorne Bridge segment is now off wire even though the earlier renderings depicted it being a wired segment. The section through the square will be off wire which should minimize the construction impact on the sidewalks. I guess the segment by Gateway is to avoid bridge clearance conflicts.

Also I hope the city gives the Gomaco cars to Lakewood Trolley when phase 2 opens. I know an OCS system would have to be installed but would be a great asset for Lakewood Trolley.

Edited by ajfunder
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, kermit said:

[to Piedmont] Yes, but a Cedar Street routing would make a Lakewood spur _incredibly_ cheap. As I frequently say here, Seversville has the potential to be a slightly smaller and cooler Southend and this would make it a perfect for TIF.

Unfortunately the line on the new map appears to be nothing more than the original 2030 plan idea (although I think the explicit choice of Cedar Street is new). One thing I prematurely wonder about is where the West line would terminate. It makes little sense to me to turn the vehicles at Cedar and Trade (thus forcing nearly everyone into 2 or 3 or 4 seat rides to the airport). Running the West Line through to Plaza / post-Eastland would certainly pick up more riders and increase frequencies on the Gold Line route. Turing West Line trans at the CTC feels weird and wasteful and I have a hard time imagining they would accommodate turn arounds there. 

[EDIT: No reason that a 'streetcar' could not be put into dedicated ROW on the South side or center of Wilkenson]

I think the streetcar line to the airport will probably be abandoned in favor of continuing the Silver line to the airport.  It seems, based on my reading of various articles and reports, that CATS is interested in building a light rail line to the airport, and there has been talk about how to best route the Silver line through Uptown such that it allows for an SLE (Silver Line Extension) to the airport in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, ajfunder said:

Hmm the Hawthorne Bridge segment is now off wire even though the earlier renderings depicted it being a wired segment. The section through the square will be off wire which should minimize the construction impact on the sidewalks. I guess the segment by Gateway is to avoid bridge clearance conflicts.

Also I hope the city gives the Gomaco cars to Lakewood Trolley when phase 2 opens. I know an OCS system would have to be installed but would be a great asset for Lakewood Trolley.

I think they should use the replica cars in addition to Car 85 and that Trolley they procured from Charleston that needs refurbishing.  In my fantasy land, Victory/ST would take over Savona Mill and provide private funding to the Lakewood trolley line.  They could help restore the line from Savona to Cedar Yards where it could then be tied into CGS via Cedar Street.  Imagine how cool it would be to have a beautiful, historic, century-old mill serving as their home with a dedicated beer trolley to uptown.  It would probably be the only such trolley in the world and It would be epic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2016 at 5:24 PM, ajfunder said:

Hmm the Hawthorne Bridge segment is now off wire even though the earlier renderings depicted it being a wired segment. The section through the square will be off wire which should minimize the construction impact on the sidewalks. I guess the segment by Gateway is to avoid bridge clearance conflicts.

Also I hope the city gives the Gomaco cars to Lakewood Trolley when phase 2 opens. I know an OCS system would have to be installed but would be a great asset for Lakewood Trolley.

^ I would assume that by taking trolley off wire there they have avoided the need to replace the bridge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, archiham04 said:

^ I would assume that by taking trolley off wire there they have avoided the need to replace the bridge?

Nope, the existing bridge cant support the weight of the streetcar vehicles, thats why it is being replaced. I think the cost of replacing Hawthorne bridge is why Phase 2 doesn't go beyond Sunnyside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 277 cap is something that has been showing up in various renderings for quite a while now. It's pretty much a pie-in-the-sky idea at the moment. I would love to see it happen and think it could become a reality someday in the future but it would require nearly every available lot around it to be developed first before the financials will make sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, go_vertical said:

The 277 cap is something that has been showing up in various renderings for quite a while now. It's pretty much a pie-in-the-sky idea at the moment. I would love to see it happen and think it could become a reality someday in the future but it would require nearly every available lot around it to be developed first before the financials will make sense. 

Agreed, it'd be SO expensive.

I wish gov'ts would understand that you don't even need a "cap" to make a bridge/highway less detrimental, you really just need a wide bridge. You COULD build it to sustain a structure, or soil/foliage, but it only needs the width and safety to allow people to feel comfortable for it to have a positive effect. 

Edited by SgtCampsalot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gold Line average weekday ridership compiled from CATS quarterly FTA reports:

April 2016: 1,773
January 2016: 1,707
October 2015: 1,709
August 2015: 1,682
July 2015: 1,507 (from Observer http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article32342751.html )

Projected ridership: 1,100 (also from Observer article above)

Projected ridership (initial FTA grant application): 900 (from Observer article)

Edited by kermit
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, kermit said:

Gold Line average weekday ridership compiled from CATS quarterly FTA reports:

April 2016: 1,773
January 2016: 1,707
October 2015: 1,709
August 2015: 1,682
July 2015: 1,507 (from Observer http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article32342751.html )

Projected ridership: 1,100 (also from Observer article above)

Projected ridership (initial FTA grant application): 900 (from Observer article)

I hate to be negative, but I bet that number falls when they start charging people to ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just gonna point out that the streetcar has had only one vehicle operating for the last 10 days. Apparently car 92 and 93 are down and it has been extremely frustrating as a frequent streetcar rider. Headways even at peak times have been close to 20-30 minutes and I have opted to walk/bike instead of waiting.

Edited by ajfunder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ I thought things seemed really sparse yesterday when I biked the route, I just chalked it up to holiday schedule. But a 20 minute headway is way too long for the streetcar no matter what day it is.

Atlanta's system has definitely been a disaster. On the other hand Kansas City's new line (only open about three weeks) has been killing it (averaging around 6,400 riders per day on a 2.2 mile loop -- about double us on a per mile basis). Granted they still have the novelty factor going for them, but it appears to be a well designed project. They also will always be free to ride, they set up a neighborhood services district to pay for operating costs and part of that deal was for it to be a fare-free service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kermit said:

^ I thought things seemed really sparse yesterday when I biked the route, I just chalked it up to holiday schedule. But a 20 minute headway is way too long for the streetcar no matter what day it is.

Atlanta's system has definitely been a disaster. On the other hand Kansas City's new line (only open about three weeks) has been killing it (averaging around 6,400 riders per day on a 2.2 mile loop -- about double us on a per mile basis). Granted they still have the novelty factor going for them, but it appears to be a well designed project. They also will always be free to ride, they set up a neighborhood services district to pay for operating costs and part of that deal was for it to be a fare-free service.

I just moved to Charlotte from the KC area. The streetcar there was extremely well planned out, and benefited from really building the whole thing all at once. The "loop" really hits all the big spots downtown, and is really actually convenient from a transportation point of view, and not just novelty. The free for use thing Is really the way I think a streetcar loop like that has to work. The streetcar here feels like much more of a "line" at full buildout for actually commuting rather than the KC streetcar being a "loop" that works much better for downtown circulation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've had operational/safety problems and have fallen short of their ridership expectations (in 2015: 900,000 riders vs 1.1 million expected)

http://www.myajc.com/news/news/transportation/cling-clang-clunk-inside-the-atlanta-streetcars-fi/npnH7/

For comparison's sake: Their ridership is about 11,000 riders per mile per month. GoldLine is about 1,100 riders per mile per month

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My math came out way differently, under the assumption that Atlanta did 900k in 2015 with free fares, on a 2.7 mile system.

Using 2015 when they were both free: Atlanta = 27,000 per mile/per month; Charlotte = 34,000 per mile/per month

So Charlotte, or a "no fare" basis is outperforming Atlanta by 25%, and that's using the old nostalgic vehicles (and I'd argue less connected given Streetcar doesn't go to West Trade yet)

Atlanta in 1Q16, when they started charging, ridership dropped to 11,000 per mile / per month

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, atlrvr said:

My math came out way differently, under the assumption that Atlanta did 900k in 2015 with free fares, on a 2.7 mile system.

Using 2015 when they were both free: Atlanta = 27,000 per mile/per month; Charlotte = 34,000 per mile/per month

So Charlotte, or a "no fare" basis is outperforming Atlanta by 25%, and that's using the old nostalgic vehicles (and I'd argue less connected given Streetcar doesn't go to West Trade yet)

Atlanta in 1Q16, when they started charging, ridership dropped to 11,000 per mile / per month

You're absolutely right, I basically dropped a zero. I blame holiday brain. Go Charlotte!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.