Jump to content

SouthEnd Midrise Projects


atlrvr

Recommended Posts


13 hours ago, KJHburg said:

what they should do is make the driver's insurance company paid for a replacement.  Their insured hit it for whatever reason and they should be held responsible. 

Seems like it should be easy to address, especially since it was hit by a street sweeper who was likely a city contractor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Seabrooke said:

I think the flatiron building does a much better job with its 3 sides personally. Yes, one side is good, but I think this is much more of a fail than Atherton personally.

image.thumb.png.bd5e37c86a79b3c608102fd8dbf9ac8e.pngimage.thumb.png.1dd5001d66ce0cf298ee3474b2697be9.png

image.thumb.png.35ffe16f9128ed85cee6e5e3bba1ddd4.pngimage.thumb.png.b86be1e4260351ce8ef3ddb5175d9d3b.pngimage.thumb.png.983269e9658e332aaf17b86c96470b73.pngimage.thumb.png.29a35625eb7139bfa9b5531c4cfaf188.png

I image.thumb.png.b86be1e4260351ce8ef3ddb5175d9d3b.png

Flatiron doesn't have a single parking space. You cannot compare the two, and don't say buildings don't need parking, because that's not correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ricky_davis_fan_21 said:

Flatiron doesn't have a single parking space. You cannot compare the two, and don't say buildings don't need parking, because that's not correct.

In New York they don’t, in Charlotte we need to be in a phase where we look at how much parking a building *really* needs. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nakers2 said:

In New York they don’t, in Charlotte we need to be in a phase where we look at how much parking a building *really* needs. 

I agree, but I'm saying on that particular parcel, any amount of parking would have to be visible in some manner, because of the code requirements of parking decks. Its not optimal, but the fact is, it would not have been financed, or leased by anyone without what the companies that leased, financed, and developed this building deemed was sufficient parking.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, KJHburg said:

what they should do is make the driver's insurance company paid for a replacement.  Their insured hit it for whatever reason and they should be held responsible. 

I wonder if there's some threshold that makes it worth the city's while to go after a driver.  If a motorist destroys a sign, those are pretty cheap and easy to fabricate and replace, maybe not worth the legal effort/expense.  For a bike counter, maybe?  A traffic signal cabinet that costs >$10,000?  I'd be curious to learn more if anyone on this forum has any insight.

 

In this case, a commercial vehicle with a (presumably) professional driver jumped a 4' curb to mow this thing down.  Police responded to the scene and can provide a crash report with all details.  This looks to me like complete negligence and it seems to me like a no-brainer that the driver's insurance company should have to pay out.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, michaelef said:

Ugh I feel like we can't have anything nice near Charlotte roads, the number accidents I've seen happen where people go off the road. I get accidents happen, I just feel like it's so frequent in Charlotte. A few of those planters on the new plaza bike lanes have been hit already. 

Petition to add bollards everywhere...and bury power lines begins now! 

Now the question is... should I make them not replacing it go viral?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Seabrooke said:

I would have never compared the two. The person I was replying to did.

Yea I got it. Just wanted to remind people that we are probably 15-20 years from being able to get away with something like Flatiron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.