Jump to content

Brightline Trains


FLheat

Recommended Posts

Many of us knew it was going to be at the Cocoa Curve behind the Wal-mart.  For some reason I thought I had said this previously, but I can't remember.  The bigger news was Stuart.  I felt pretty confident the location would be in Stuart, not in Ft. Pierce, because of the economic factors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, dcluley98 said:

Many of us knew it was going to be at the Cocoa Curve behind the Wal-mart.  For some reason I thought I had said this previously, but I can't remember.  The bigger news was Stuart.  I felt pretty confident the location would be in Stuart, not in Ft. Pierce, because of the economic factors. 

It appears the number one factor in these decisions was number of seconds it adds to the travel time. Both stations are located where the train needs to slow down anyways due to curves.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, aent said:

It appears the number one factor in these decisions was number of seconds it adds to the travel time. Both stations are located where the train needs to slow down anyways due to curves.

Yep. It's already 3 hours 25 min to Miami. If they keep chipping on more, a car starts to become faster even with traffic. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, aent said:

It appears the number one factor in these decisions was number of seconds it adds to the travel time. Both stations are located where the train needs to slow down anyways due to curves.

Agreed, which is why many of us knew it was slated for the Cocoa curve. It is slowing down there anyway, so doesn't add as much time wasted for the stop. As for Stuart, that bridge is supposedly getting fixed, so I am not so sure that was the deciding factor on Stuart. The demographics and ridership probably was a large factor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, dcluley98 said:

Agreed, which is why many of us knew it was slated for the Cocoa curve. It is slowing down there anyway, so doesn't add as much time wasted for the stop. As for Stuart, that bridge is supposedly getting fixed, so I am not so sure that was the deciding factor on Stuart. The demographics and ridership probably was a large factor. 

Regarding Cocoa-- true, but this was a common sense no brainer.  We're talking about a private company here, not The State or FDOT.  Their focus is money, not ridiculousness.

Roaming Rail Fan would show drone video of that zone, time and again, and, Google Map (if people just spend a few minutes looking closely) showed (and shows) not only the Cocoa Curve, the cross streets and tunnels FEC built, but also the FEC rail yard already there (to the north) and all the vacant land around there.  Cocoa Curve is also at 528 (which leads right at Port Canaveral) with two exits in close proximity to one another; merely two blocks apart.

So, the whole "slowing down and what not" as a factor aside, all these other factors made it very apparent that it would go somewhere here, which make it the natural location for a station. 

Also, busses from the future station could literally get on an EB ramp to 528 extremely quickly if on Industry Rd, Grissom, Clearlake, or, even US-1 (where the second ramp is).  Personally I think the station will be off of Industry Road to keep Port Canaveral busses off of US-1.

If Port Canaveral didn't exists, not only would the station not go right at 528 & US-1, it may not even be built period in Brevard, which is why this location was a foregone conclusion. 

It's is and always was about Port Canaveral- which I totally agree with.  Stuart, which I disagreed with,  was about a concession and shutting them up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, dcluley98 said:

It's behind the Walmart where they already owned the land and used it for material staging during construction. 

they also own land to the north border of The Curve as well to the east of Industry (and wherever else that is not demarcated). 

I thought they were going to try to avoid being near that Wal-Mart and Clearlake Dr.  Now, those busses are going to be accessing Clearlake from the station to go west to the Industry 528 EB exit ramp and battling Wal-Mart traffic.  Maybe they needed a longer straightaway and that was the best spot for that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, dcluley98 said:

Agreed, which is why many of us knew it was slated for the Cocoa curve. It is slowing down there anyway, so doesn't add as much time wasted for the stop. As for Stuart, that bridge is supposedly getting fixed, so I am not so sure that was the deciding factor on Stuart. The demographics and ridership probably was a large factor. 

Even after the bridge is fixed, it will still have a much slower speed limit then the rest of the route due to the curvature, it just won't be 25mph and single-tracked slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't know that much about bonds and how they work, but I am very  happy that BL is a success and more and more people are incorporating BL into their travel plans.  I don't think BL is the end all be all, but it is an important piece...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desantis just signed in a new transportation package that while having the typical red meat for the anti-"woke" dorks, did have one decent little nugget:
"The bill also will direct the Florida Rail Enterprise to include among its duties the acquisition of “future rail corridors and rights-of-way in coordination with FDOT’s planning of the state highway system.” A Senate version of the bill initially sought a 44-foot-wide rail corridor in the Interstate 4 right-of-way to extend the private Brightline passenger rail service from Orlando to Tampa."

https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2024/04/03/desantis-oks-transportation-package.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cubanbread said:

Desantis just signed in a new transportation package that while having the typical red meat for the anti-"woke" dorks, did have one decent little nugget:
"The bill also will direct the Florida Rail Enterprise to include among its duties the acquisition of “future rail corridors and rights-of-way in coordination with FDOT’s planning of the state highway system.” A Senate version of the bill initially sought a 44-foot-wide rail corridor in the Interstate 4 right-of-way to extend the private Brightline passenger rail service from Orlando to Tampa."

https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2024/04/03/desantis-oks-transportation-package.html

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/667806-gov-desantis-signs-measure-to-hurry-transportation-projects-clamp-down-on-activism-on-roads/

Anyway, the Express lanes and widening from US 27 in, and the Poinciana Connector will now be fast tracked.  The future rail easement identifying is good...

you should make a post about the political slant in the Coffee House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, cubanbread said:

Desantis just signed in a new transportation package that while having the typical red meat for the anti-"woke" dorks, did have one decent little nugget:
"The bill also will direct the Florida Rail Enterprise to include among its duties the acquisition of “future rail corridors and rights-of-way in coordination with FDOT’s planning of the state highway system.” A Senate version of the bill initially sought a 44-foot-wide rail corridor in the Interstate 4 right-of-way to extend the private Brightline passenger rail service from Orlando to Tampa."

https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2024/04/03/desantis-oks-transportation-package.html

44'?  That's not wide enough.  BL had 50' and still didn't have room for the drainage swales and signals.

Edited by codypet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, codypet said:

44'?  That's not wide enough.  BL had 50' and still didn't have room for the drainage swales and signals.

maybe that's like an urban fully cement lined corridor with sewage built in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, codypet said:

They'd still need R/W for stormwater facilities then.....somewhere offline.

would they design that incrementally along the corridor, like retention ponds are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, codypet said:

44'?  That's not wide enough.  BL had 50' and still didn't have room for the drainage swales and signals.

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate South is being designed to transport all stormwater off to the sides of the highway with underground stormwater facilities, without any need for swales. and such, with retention ponds along the sides of the highway, at exit ramps, etc. The entire median will have jersey barriers to protect vehicle from entering into the rail ROW. Also, since this new corridor is supposed to be used exclusively for trains with no freight, they can have the tracks slightly closer together. I'm sure Brightline would be speaking up if they did not have adequate space.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, aent said:

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate South is being designed to transport all stormwater off to the sides of the highway with underground stormwater facilities, without any need for swales. and such, with retention ponds along the sides of the highway, at exit ramps, etc. The entire median will have jersey barriers to protect vehicle from entering into the rail ROW. Also, since this new corridor is supposed to be used exclusively for trains with no freight, they can have the tracks slightly closer together. I'm sure Brightline would be speaking up if they did not have adequate space.

Yea hopefully.  Aside from drainage needs, the also need room for the signal houses and the maintenance access.  I wouldn't be surprised if they opt to go single track if they're looking for that tight of R/W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2024 at 2:52 PM, codypet said:

Yea hopefully.  Aside from drainage needs, the also need room for the signal houses and the maintenance access.  I wouldn't be surprised if they opt to go single track if they're looking for that tight of R/W.

The plans have it as double track. Considering its only planned to be used by Brightline, they might have minimal signals and switches perhaps? I also imagine the equipment can be post mounted in the air if need be, and that some areas will have some extra room

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.