Jump to content

PROPOSED: Vista Della Torre


Recommended Posts

The timeline is more troubling than the design of the placement of the building, etc.

Very interesting strategy. They are running very early interference now so that when and if the market is projected to be ready for action in 2010-11 they can move fast in 2009.

But...two problems:

1) thetre is no provision that commits to this even being a "go" 1 1/2 years from now (I know of no way the city can make one)

2) the potential that we have another open space/parking lot instead of a building

I do see the point of moving the building much closer to Broadway and then perhaps with no street abandonment - but the critical factor is a plan that approves street abandonment conditional upon actual vertical construction commencing no later than September 2008.

How's that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 509
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The City Council did the right thing tonight and sent the abandonment of Bradford Street and the air rights on Federal Street back to Planning and CPC for review.

Everyone who wrote letters and made calls really made the difference on this one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The City Council did the right thing tonight and sent the abandonment of Bradford Street and the air rights on Federal Street back to Planning and CPC for review.

Everyone who wrote letters and made calls really made the difference on this one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

here is a paragraph from an un-related project in a recent PROJO story:

"The commission had also expected to hear petitions from a developer planning a 33-story condominium tower on Federal Hill that would require the city to abandon Bradford Street and allow use of the air rights over Federal Street, but the review was postponed at the request of the developer. Mayor David N. Cicilline has asked the developer, Frank Zammiello of Cranston, to find a way to build the tower that would not involve the abandonment of Bradford Street. "

go Mayor!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was continued at last night's CPC meeting. The Mayor asked the developer to sit down with the Planning Department to come up with a plan that does not include closing Bradford Street. So the Developer asked for a continuance per the Mayor's request.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 stories on federal hill?? that is bigger than anything in the city thus far, correct? any of the skyscraper size queens please feel free to confirm that # for me ;) i can't believe this is realistic at 33 stories.. from a community opposition standpoint or from a business sense. i bet it never gets built at that height...in that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 stories on federal hill?? that is bigger than anything in the city thus far, correct? any of the skyscraper size queens please feel free to confirm that # for me ;) i can't believe this is realistic at 33 stories.. from a community opposition standpoint or from a business sense. i bet it never gets built at that height...in that spot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, see, that's just arrogance. I don't know about you, but I find such an attitude to be downright offensive. Height? I fail to see how height offers offense. But bar me from your building because I'm just a dirty commoner, and yeah I'll probably get a lil' bit upset about that. :thumbsup:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again with this project, we come back to the fact that the site sits next to an interstate highway, making it an appropriate spot for height & hi-density. But this is an old discussion.

And as to these notions of context & scale, I ask, have you ever been to New York City, and if so, have you ever heard of building there named the Empire State Building? Only the most famous & beloved skyscraper in the world, the ESB is even today completely (and amazingly) out-of-scale to the buildings surrounding it. And I believe (in this very thread, some time ago) Garris has already proposed the example of the Eiffel Tower, which is just a little bit out-of-scale to the rest of Paris and has somehow strangely become emblematic not only of its city, but also of its country. Fancy that.

So yes, misterchlo, I think you were exactly right to say that it's not the size of the skyscraper that matters, but rather how you use the skyscraper. I like a good democratic skyscraper in an already vibrant urban neighborhood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again with this project, we come back to the fact that the site sits next to an interstate highway, making it an appropriate spot for height & hi-density. But this is an old discussion.

And as to these notions of context & scale, I ask, have you ever been to New York City, and if so, have you ever heard of building there named the Empire State Building? Only the most famous & beloved skyscraper in the world, the ESB is even today completely (and amazingly) out-of-scale to the buildings surrounding it. And I believe (in this very thread, some time ago) Garris has already proposed the example of the Eiffel Tower, which is just a little bit out-of-scale to the rest of Paris and has somehow strangely become emblematic not only of its city, but also of its country. Fancy that.

So yes, misterchlo, I think you were exactly right to say that it's not the size of the skyscraper that matters, but rather how you use the skyscraper. I like a good democratic skyscraper in an already vibrant urban neighborhood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.