Jump to content

IN PROGRESS: Capitol Cove


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 771
  • Created
  • Last Reply
living in lower cost apartments next door to the train station wouldn't be a bad idea for someone who works in boston. it's an almost ideal car-free apartment complex (almost because there's currently no grocery stores or pharmacies within walking distance, but kennedy plaza is nearby).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sentiments can be summarized in Ed Achorn's article in the Journal. The people that this complex would most likely support are leaving the state in droves. This is nothing new. It would have been more progressive to attract business to a city center in a state that continues to drive business, industrey, and middle-of-the-line taxpayers away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you could never prove that people wont move there..

I dont see Jerry's point at all. We have businesses interested in E&B and we have space at Gtech and soon the AMEX building will be free again.. tell me why capital cove is better off being a business that wont be allowed to exceed a certain height due to its location VS apartments that have no reason not to fill up. You dont have to work in the city, or even the state to live there. Its called a train, bus, or car. And sometimes people like to move within a city, for a fresh place to live. I think the opportunities are endless when it comes to who could live there and why, its just not that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a few points:

the renderings are too small to make a real solid judgement on (at least for me) but don't look all that bad to me.

this location is oddly shaped, height restricted, and next to the rail line which clearly limits what can (and what someone can get financing for/want to build there) be built there. It also abutts a river than has to be improved as part of the extended riverwalk and a multi-level parking garage and sloped city street. However, with the gold line, the train station, and other RIPTA bus routes (50, etc.) along with walking make this site almost perfect for residential use, not to mention this will become part of a new 'capitol region neighborhood' being created (waterplace, park row, etc.). Its close to the east side and it's amenities and attractiveness. Most Brown and RISD are walkable from here.

there is much more of a need for apartments than condos or another hotel.

I made the assumption that at least some of these (closest to the tracks??) will be moderately priced - not to be confused with "affordable."

As Mikey pointed out, there are plenty of other opportunites in better places (the parking lot district, parcel 12, citizens lots, new land after 195 is moved, E@B, top 2 floors of Gtech, etc.) for commercial uses.

Its across from and will have access to the park (I forgot the name - cross from Canal), the riverwalk, waterplace, and burnside via the ped tunnel - all great for residential.

just my 2 cents (well, more like a dollar in this case)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't mean to offend anyone hear, but I wonder if possibly those with the least optimistic views of Providence future are the older people here on the board. Ya, I mean you Jerry2 and of course Pete11. Sometimes older and wiser is a good thing. Maybe sometimes memories of the dark old days of Providence are just too hard to shake.

Not that you each don't have valid points and such, but for real change to occur you often need a bit of almost blind optimism. Just a little while ago most Londoners would have laughed you out of the pub if you said in the not so distant future their city would be one of the hippest most desirable cities in the EU. But now it is true. Same can be said of Dublin.

Believe me, the sad state of affairs vis a vis infrastructure, taxes, schooling, corruption darkens my soul some days. But honestly, as cliche as it is, you have to keep the faith on some level :D .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So should the city just tell the developer they can't build anything on this parcel until and unless the business climate in Rhode Island turns around? Just leave the parcel vacant? No construction jobs? Should all development in the city stop until we can get some office towers built?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not like there is no office bldg development going on. The following are all partly or entirely office according to info on UP:

GTech

E@B

ALCO

Dynamo House

Foundry/Sharpe Bldg

There is also still plenty of space for future growth (195 land for example) so it's really far fetched to assume that the residential/hotel stuff is going to lead to a lack of space for office projects down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jenkins, I'm with you. I am normally a very optimistic person. I have many young people working for me (early 20's) and I try to suck in as much of their enthusiasm as possible. For that very same reason http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070110/ts_nm/...ordability_dc_1 this makes me angry.

I know most people on this board have visions of everything being full and vibrant once completed. In my minds eye I already see these apartments as run down. This project really gets to me, because I always thought that something special could go in this area, and this ain't that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really do hope it all works out, but I have a sinking feeling that all the projects together won't attract as many high incomed people as initialy projected, and this is what we'll have around the State house. I get that there is nothing there now, but I would have liked some commercial with green space in that area, but no one's building that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

exaclyt the type of mentality that is being described. If you admittedly see something as run-down and graffiti covered BEFORE IT'S EVEN BUILT, then yes, you are a pessimist, sorry.

while certain things are evident in both the national and local economies, that should not be reason to not build something (the lenders will ultimately decide if it should be built really). This also isn't an area that will attract tons of taggers, especially once built (and lighted).

I would be much more worried if this was going to be yet another set of mid to upper priced condos, another hotel, or even a spec commercial building versus it being apartments. Having said that, I agree that I would love to see a low/mid rise corporate HQ relocation from Boston, but thats not happening right now, and a dirt lot that sits empty for 10 years in this location when there is plenty of buildable commercial lots for the future is a much worse alternative than this IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really do hope it all works out, but I have a sinking feeling that all the projects together won't attract as many high incomed people as initialy projected, and this is what we'll have around the State house. I get that there is nothing there now, but I would have liked some commercial with green space in that area, but no one's building that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

exaclyt the type of mentality that is being described. If you admittedly see something as run-down and graffiti covered BEFORE IT'S EVEN BUILT, then yes, you are a pessimist, sorry.

while certain things are evident in both the national and local economies, that should not be reason to not build something (the lenders will ultimately decide if it should be built really). This also isn't an area that will attract tons of taggers, especially once built (and lighted).

I would be much more worried if this was going to be yet another set of mid to upper priced condos, another hotel, or even a spec commercial building versus it being apartments. Having said that, I agree that I would love to see a low/mid rise corporate HQ relocation from Boston, but thats not happening right now, and a dirt lot that sits empty for 10 years in this location when there is plenty of buildable commercial lots for the future is a much worse alternative than this IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe we're even questioning this. Apartments directly adjacent to commuter rail and within walking distance of everything downtown, the mall, tons of jobs, Thayer Street, Waterplace Park. If they can mitigate the dreaded train noise (oh no!!!) then this is an absolute no-brainer and a really nice development if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe we're even questioning this. Apartments directly adjacent to commuter rail and within walking distance of everything downtown, the mall, tons of jobs, Thayer Street, Waterplace Park. If they can mitigate the dreaded train noise (oh no!!!) then this is an absolute no-brainer and a really nice development if you ask me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.