Jump to content

CATS Long Term Transit Plan - Silver, Red Lines


monsoon

Recommended Posts

File under "anecdotal," but I boarded the Gold Rush at Presbyterian after an appointment mid-morning today, and it left with a good 20 people or so. Not bad for mid-morning on a route extension that has only been in service for a few weeks. Methinks the streetcar will do quite nicely.

In related news, the Gold Rush Orange line is making 6 trips a day out to the Charlotte School of Law (which, IMO, should really consider relocating Uptown)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


While I generally discount the blather from the right wing I am starting to wonder if there is some substance to today's meme that the CATS / Observer 'oligarchy' has begun to lobby the public for an additional half cent. The apoplectic right says that CATS threats of delay on the BLE combined with the opening of the new downtown UNCC building are the seeds to the request. When you combine that with the new airport news we just received (and they were not smart enough to find) I wonder if they (accidentally) might be onto something.

Having said that, I believe that increasing the sales tax in Mecklenburg would require new legislation from Raleigh -- I can't imagine that is in the cards in the current political climate. Gosh, I wonder how they missed that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

FWIW commuter rail funding from the federal government is still flowing. The DOT just committed $1 billion to Denver commuter rail:

http://www.progressiverailroading.com/prdailynews/news.asp?id=27812

While this commuter rail project is certainly very different than ours (it connects to the airport) I think its important for CATS to keep in mind that commuter rail funding is possible in some contexts (e.g. would federal funding come available if CATS magically found a way to run the red line from Mt Morne to Gateway to the airport and then on to Gastonia? Yes I do understand that Norfolk Southern would not be hip to this on their tracks....)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

A new report on how to pay for the red line has just been released by the "task force" The kinda vague CBJ article on it is here:

http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/queen_city_agenda/2011/09/new-pitch-for-commuter-rail.html?ed=2011-09-29&s=article_du&ana=e_du_pub

Its hard to tell but it sounds like they are investigating the possibility of selling industrial sites along the line and ramping up nighttime freight service to help pay the bills. Sounds potentially interesting and innovative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Reading the summary from the September 28 meeting of MTC leads me to believe that the median BRT option for Independence has, for all intents and purposes, been scrubbed. It seems that there is now a push to turn the SE corridor into a rail corridor as per the recommendation of the ULI panel, however, the MTC is not necessarily sold that streetcars would be the appropriate technology choice. The MTC is looking to study different alignments as well as different technologies such as commuter rail and light rail in addition to streetcar as proposed by the panel. Here is the summary of the September 28 meeting and the Agenda for the October 26 meeting. The summary provides a synopsis of the actual discussion while some of the attached legislative proposals closer to the bottom of the document expand more on the specifics.

http://charmeck.org/city/charlotte/cats/about/CATSBoard/mtc/MTC%20Agenda/MTC%20Agenda%20October%2026,%202011.pdf

Edited by cltbwimob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^Thank you for posting that. I made an interesting read. I noticed that they speak of a 2017 BLE opening in their timetable.

I also am glad that they are putting some focus on the Red Line with the freight service usage. Frankly I would like to see this happen already as we need the forward momentum on regional transit improvements.

I'm also happy to see them talking in somewhat optimism about pursuing the Monroe streetcar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is perhaps independent of the 2030 plan, but I saw in interview with Dan Morrill on the news last night discussing putting car 85 back on the tracks to Wesley Heights. He said the demonstrator (I guess powered by the generator) could be up and running as soon as next year! I don't know the area well, but I remember some breaks in the track? And I also wonder how far it would go? My guess was out to the Celadon project but maybe someone who knows the hood' better could elaborate. That would still be less than a mile. Anyway, a cool development none the less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As cool as it would be, I really see it as being laughable fuel for anti-transit people if the starter line only goes from Celadon to Cedar st. Some missing sections of track would need to be restored/extended to make this worthwhile. I think it NEEDS to go into uptown more, but I'm not sure if tracks could handle the incline where the greenway goes under the railroad tracks at BofA Stadium and rises to Graham, or if they can run it through the Hartigans parking lot in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe turn at Cedar and serve as a spur off Center City Streetcar, connecting in Gateway Village via West Trade Street. Of course, the West Corridor is already planned to someday spur off West Trade at Cedar Street, but that is to head to Wilkinson Boulevard via West Morehead Street.

Alternatively, maybe spur off West Trade Street via Wesley Heights Way to Celadon. The distance between Celadon and West Trade appears to be a lot less than Hartigan's and West Trade. Still, I suppose this alternative would depend on whether the next phase of streetcar even reaches the Historic West End, for it may just barely make it to Gateway Village.

Edited by southslider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is basically an industrial-TIF, right? I mean, the hope was that places like Briton Development and Mount Mourne would generate tax increments to finance the line. Now that residential development can't help, why not explore industrial projects? But I wonder how "small" industrial projects might afford infrastructure for a freight train. Seems like "small" might be a misnomer.

Here is an article exploring how European cities are using the inner city trams to also transport goods. Think about how congested the roads are on I-77 @ Lake Norman and it's adjoining exits are (there is a Target and Harris Teeter at every exit for 6 straight exits). Surely decreased freight over road could help. But how do you transfer from the rail to their loading docks?

http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2011/10/23/opportunities-abound-for-transporting-goods-by-tram-if-properly-coordinated/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^IMHO, the new approach for Red Line has two huge pros:

1) The value capture on industrial development, as well as TOD, means the full corridor helps fund the line, not just station areas.

2) Iredell County is more likely to support a project that not only adds commuter rail to Mooresville, but also freight rail to Statesville.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While extending the route to Statesville is a good idea have they said how they will do it? The existing route via Barber Junction is not direct enough for commuter service (although it would be fine -- perhaps better -- for freight). The old route direct from Moresville has been torn up from Mazeppa road to downtown Troutman. It looks like the ROW is _mostly_ intact but it does not appear to be owned by the state. Any idea who has possession of the route and which path they plan to use?

The outline of the route issue can be seen here: http://www.bytrain.org/quicklinks/pdf/nc_railmap_10.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like applications for TIGER III have gone out, the Dept of Trans says that they will determine recipients before the end of the year.

Has anyone heard about any local applications?

EDIT: Well I found one local application "Racing to Charlotte: A Regional Greenway-Bikeway-Transit Network"

http://charmeck.org/mecklenburg/county/BOCC/Meetings/Agendas/Documents/1018/October182011-23d-.pdf

Edited by kermit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

There is an interesting interview with Peter Rogoff (head of the Federal Transit Administration) about Charlotte transit at the Business Journal. While the interview touches on the Federal view on most aspects of Charlotte rail transit there is not much new ground broken by the piece.

http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/queen_city_agenda/2011/12/fta-chief-arrives-bearing-gifts.html?ed=2011-12-20&s=article_du&ana=e_du_pub&page=all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.