Yesterday, I made my first visit to Libby Hill park in many years (I recently moved back so I am gradually rediscovering my home town). I think that the view to the southeast that "named Richmond" should be preserved in a way that accommodates commercial development while maximizing river access. With regards to the view west and the proposed high rise, I am totally in favor of that building. The view west is already obstructed by foliage in many places, as well as the Lucky Strike power plant. The relatively minor reduction in view that will be caused by the Pear Street project is vastly outweighed by the benefits of the project (increased density, population, taxpayer base, etc.). My concern is that if development is sacrificed to save an already compromised view, it will set a bad precedent for future development that falls in the Libby Hill sight lines. Potential (and hopeful) high rise construction in Manchester would serve to reduce the view from Libby Hill and curtail sunset viewing during certain times of the year -- should that be prohibited because it could interfere with a park over a mile away? The view west is nice, but preserving it at all costs will be detrimental to the city as a whole. If the city wants to compete with Henrico and Chesterfield (not to mention NOVA, Raleigh, Charlotte, and Atlanta), projects like these need to be encouraged lest Richmond be viewed as a place where doing business is hassle and large scale, trans-formative development is met with hostility.