Jump to content

Unified Development Ordinance


kermit

Recommended Posts


Mayor Vi Liles [email protected]  

At Large Dimple Ajmera [email protected]  

At Large LaWana Mayfield [email protected]  

At Large James Mitchell [email protected]  

At Large Victoria Watlington [email protected]  

District 1 Dante Anderson [email protected] One Click - District 1

District 2 Malcolm Graham [email protected] One Click - District 2

District 3 Tiawana Brown [email protected] One Click - District 3

District 4 Reneé Perkins Johnson [email protected] One Click - District 4

District 5 Marjorie Molina [email protected] One Click - District 5

District 6 Tariq Bokhari [email protected] One Click - District 6

District 7 Ed Driggs ed.driggs@charlottenc

 

Resume emailing them all telling them that you're watching them & should uphold the UDO full adoption 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, I’m fine with triplex corners.  Plus, it appears they’re planning to allow townhomes in N-1 districts.  I’ll take townhomes up and down N-1, including A through D, over triplexes any day.  Townhomes currently not allowed in N-1.  Planning added them to N-1 E & F, and Victoria shared she’d be open to townhomes in all N-1 zones which would be a meaningful increase in density allowances.

Edited by RANYC
  • Like 3
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, RANYC said:

Nah, I’m fine with triplex corners.  Plus, it appears they’re planning to allow townhomes in N-1 districts.  I’ll take townhomes up and down N-1, including A through D, over triplexes any day.  Townhomes currently not allowed in N-1.  Planning added them to N-1 E & F, and Victoria shared she’d be open to townhomes in all N-1 zones which would be a meaningful increase in density allowances.

That's even more moronic. Why cherry-pick housing types? There's no rhyme or reason to it, just allow more middle missing. Allow what the market will bear. The questions we should be asking are why are we so afraid of specific housing types and why is our government leaders bending to the suburban scare tactics where none of these housing types are allowed anyway because of HOAs? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2024 at 11:27 AM, davidclt said:

With links

Mayor                Vi Liles                                         [email protected]

At Large            Dimple Ajmera                       [email protected]
At Large            LaWana Mayfield                  [email protected]
At Large            James Mitchell                       [email protected]
At Large            Victoria Watlington            [email protected]

District 1           Dante Anderson                  [email protected]           One Click - District 1
District 2           Malcolm Graham                 [email protected]      One Click - District 2
District 3           Tiawana Brown                     [email protected]             One Click - District 3
District 4           Reneé Perkins Johnson    [email protected]               One Click - District 4
District 5           Marjorie Molina                    [email protected]           One Click - District 5
District 6           Tariq Bokhari                          [email protected]                 One Click - District 6
District 7           Ed Driggs                                   [email protected]                          One Click - District 7

Once again Dimple and Vi . . . for the win with anodyne responses but responses nonetheless.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Nathan2 said:

That's even more moronic. Why cherry-pick housing types? There's no rhyme or reason to it, just allow more middle missing. Allow what the market will bear. The questions we should be asking are why are we so afraid of specific housing types and why is our government leaders bending to the suburban scare tactics where none of these housing types are allowed anyway because of HOAs? 

Because the loudest member of city council tells his rich neighbors this is bad and poor people are coming to their neighborhood. You know he knows this isn't true, but as the lone "R" on city council, he makes it his job to oppose everything. 

Bokhari literally lives next door to a duplex lol.  

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nathan2 said:

That's even more moronic. Why cherry-pick housing types? There's no rhyme or reason to it, just allow more middle missing. Allow what the market will bear. The questions we should be asking are why are we so afraid of specific housing types and why is our government leaders bending to the suburban scare tactics where none of these housing types are allowed anyway because of HOAs? 

Can’t there be a discussion of differences on this without resorting to using terms like “moronic.”  So uncalled for and honestly, the more I hear and read this vitriol thrown out by certain members of the twitterati and on here, the more disinclined I am to care and engage at all.  The objective is more density.  Right now, no townhomes are allowed in N1 and after the adjustment there would be.  Given nationwide there’s tons more demand and financing product to create townhomes than there is triplexes, we’d potentially see more housing in more places with the townhome change.

Also Alyson Craig did make a statement in the council meeting that triplexes in a car centric place like Charlotte where unit occupiers each have one or two cars tends to create even more car sitings with triplexes.  At the corner with two street frontages, the triplex could have 2 different access points to potentially rear garages thus minimizing the parked car impact on the block and reducing driveway frequency.

Im not opposed to triplexes, but given the overall goal is more density, allowing townhomes in N1 potentially gets us to the objective faster than the current regs.  By the way, SFO elimination is still in place because duplexes still allowed everywhere. 

Edited by RANYC
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, InSouthPark said:

Because the loudest member of city council tells his rich neighbors this is bad and poor people are coming to their neighborhood. You know he knows this isn't true, but as the lone "R" on city council, he makes it his job to oppose everything. 

Bokhari literally lives next door to a duplex lol.  

Ed Driggs is also R. 

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RANYC said:

 

Also Alyson Craig did make a statement in the council meeting that triplexes in a car centric place like Charlotte where unit occupiers each have one or two cars tends to create even more car sitings with triplexes.  At the corner with two street frontages, the triplex could have 2 different access points to potentially rear garages thus minimizing the parked car impact on the block and reducing driveway frequency.

Im not opposed to triplexes, but given the overall goal is more density, allowing townhomes in N1 potentially gets us to the objective faster than the current regs.  By the way, SFO elimination is still in place because duplexes still allowed everywhere. 

Then the city should start looking at how we can allow and incentivize all building types closer to uptown and maybe limiting building types farther out towards the exurbs. This would be a political win for all parties by giving density in areas that have the infrastructure and grid and limiting it in areas where politics is risking the UDO for everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.