Jump to content

SouthEnd Midrise Projects


atlrvr

Recommended Posts


2 hours ago, dylansukkert said:

The Junction just feels like a massive waste of a lot of prime real estate. 

It was one of the first built apartment complexes coming out of the severe Real estate depression 2009/2010 nobody was building hardly anything when they started it.  They got the land for cheap and built a garden style apartment complex.   Rents were substantially lower too.   The original developers from Texas sold it for a good profit maybe 5-6 years ago.   But when it was built nobody was building anything in that immediate area. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

but they would have had to sacrifice a few units! It required literally zero effort to retain a place making amenity that provides intangible community benefit.  on a corner that is already very lively with activity.

what's the corner going to be? leasing office? lobby or gym? even if we do get a retail spot out of it, imagine the shop having such a lovely tree out front for people to sit in the shade and watch the street scene.

maybe they will plant a sapling <_<

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RANYC said:

Believe me, I’m disgusted by this.  Called to complain to division of tree management.  Feckless group.  Wouldn’t be surprised if our arborist is a shill for developers.  What’s our citywide conflicts of interest policy?  And by the way, the new UDO requires mitigation for trees 30” in diameter at breast level.  Like what the hell?  It’s 12” in Jacksonville, FL.  Seems like every 5th sapling around town is dead, yet we chop a robust and healthy shade producing and carbon-ingesting gem of a magnolia, because what, we must cut down every tree in the name of affordability?  Tear down barringer/hall house in name of affordability?  Sorry, venting.

Tree Management is a predominantly operational program and has no say or interaction of any kind with privately owned trees on privately owned land. They do not create policy, that is the planning department’s gig. Do not harass the City Arborist due to your frustration with the machine overall, she is a delightful person that has no regular interaction with any of the city’s private partners. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MothBeast said:

Tree Management is a predominantly operational program and has no say or interaction of any kind with privately owned trees on privately owned land. They do not create policy, that is the planning department’s gig. Do not harass the City Arborist due to your frustration with the machine overall, she is a delightful person that has no regular interaction with any of the city’s private partners. 

Within tree mgmt, I spoke with the office of the chief urban forester and that person is a guy.  I called to complain and have every right to complain about an outcome in my community that I don't like, without cowering because I'm not yet schooled and stewed in the vagaries and intricacies of the bureaucracy.  My interactions weren't harassment, although I suspect there are plenty in the bureaucracy who believe any outreach and challenge to be harassment...unless those engaging are developers perhaps.  

As for Tree Management, the Urban Forestry group have been heavily involved in advising tree policies within the UDO.    So not just operational.

Edited by RANYC
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tree Management is the city’s operational group and is distinctly different from the Urban Forestry program. You are correct in directing your ire towards that program as it is in the Planning Department. Not trying to start something, you were mistaken and I did not want even more citizen anger directed to a group that does great work and had no say over what I agree are insufficient policies. Can’t expect even those directly in the middle of it all to understand bureaucracy, I meant no harm and wish you well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Food hall proposed on South Tryon now will be Atlanta based brewery. 

https://charlotte.axios.com/302273/proposed-food-hall-in-south-end-reimagined-as-spot-for-an-atlanta-based-brewery/

Food halls are a lot harder to put together than most think evidently as that is the 2nd food hall in Southend to be changed to something else (other being in the Line) 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, KJHburg said:

Food hall proposed on South Tryon now will be Atlanta based brewery. 

https://charlotte.axios.com/302273/proposed-food-hall-in-south-end-reimagined-as-spot-for-an-atlanta-based-brewery/

Food halls are a lot harder to put together than most think evidently as that is the 2nd food hall in Southend to be changed to something else (other being in the Line) 

I went there when I used to be in Atlanta. It's alright.  It seems like everything that was or has a presence in Atlanta wants to now be in Charlotte.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.