Jump to content

Public Transit in Providence


AriPVD

Recommended Posts

FYI: I found this vintage image online of the Westminster Street Trolley from the early 20th century... Similar to the Portland model...

westminstertrolley0kv.jpg

And this of the Weybosset trolleys, from the same time period (1905!)... If only they were there today... (sigh...)

weybosset19056iz.jpg

- Garris

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is true, but if you consider the streetcar model in Portland Oregon, which I suspect Providence is most likely to emulate, the Streetcar goes with the flow of traffic and regular traffic is able to follow or cut in front of the streetcar as if it were any other vehicle on the road... so to have the streetcar be linear and return on the same tracks, it would then be against the flow of traffic on that street, so you essentially have to have a loop, even if it is only one block away.

I do believe someone responded to my earlier post and clarified that the $30 Million per mile cost includes the extra track needed for a loop, so if true, the cost per mile of actual track is around $15 million. thats a bit easier to swallow...

the loop just has to be around the block, so it doesn't have to actually turn anywhere, it can go and turn around... i think smith st is ideal for this as it can make the loop in the center of north providence where it's a circle anyways. i just don't know where the providence loop would be, unless it went underground somewhere.

to do the other type that was mentioned, the streetcar would need its own lane, most likely in the middle of the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

question... was downtown really that dense back then.. and if so, we people living downtown, or were they traveling from other Prov neighborhoods

It probably was really that dense (several of the buildings in both of those photos are still there)... Remember, Providence's population was probably almost 50% greater at that time in the core city than it is today, and I'm sure everyone at that time was only thinking it was going to grow and planning and developing for that growth. One of the reasons we have so many great, grand, underutilized institutions is probably because they were planning for the growth that never happened.

It was still at the dawn of the automotive age (around 1905 in those photos) when the core cities were still, in every single way that mattered, the absolute center of the local governmental, economic, and social life of a region in ways we can't even begin to imagine today. Places like Wayland Square and the Blackstone neighborhoods were largely brand spanking new, "streetcar suburbs" (the exurbs of their day). Places like Seekonk were farmland and considered deeply rural.

- Garris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the loop just has to be around the block, so it doesn't have to actually turn anywhere, it can go and turn around... i think smith st is ideal for this as it can make the loop in the center of north providence where it's a circle anyways. i just don't know where the providence loop would be, unless it went underground somewhere.

I think you would have to go all the way through Providence. Loop it around Wayland Square or something.

Part of the problem, though, is that Portland funded their system through extra taxes. Are the developers and landowners along proposed routes willing to pay for the system? I kind of doubt it. We haven't reached that critical mass of people where the investment would be worth it. Maybe I am wrong.

Another problem is the whole issue of looping. Ideally, you could include a bit more places with a wider loop. For instance, I think a nice loop would be from Kennedy Plaza going up Weybosset to Elmwood, then splitting a loop which goes Elmwood Ave. in Providence to Reservoir Ave in Cranston to the Malls to Main St. in Warwick to the Warwick Station to Post Rd. and back to Elmwood. But you would have to run that loop in two directions or people would be on it an awfully long time.

It's really hard for me to envision a linear line that would have enough usage to justify it's existance, unless it is fairly short. Like from Wayland Square to Olneyville Square using Angell and Waterman on the East Side and Broadway and Westminster on the West Side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you would have to go all the way through Providence. Loop it around Wayland Square or something.

Part of the problem, though, is that Portland funded their system through extra taxes. Are the developers and landowners along proposed routes willing to pay for the system? I kind of doubt it. We haven't reached that critical mass of people where the investment would be worth it. Maybe I am wrong.

Another problem is the whole issue of looping. Ideally, you could include a bit more places with a wider loop. For instance, I think a nice loop would be from Kennedy Plaza going up Weybosset to Elmwood, then splitting a loop which goes Elmwood Ave. in Providence to Reservoir Ave in Cranston to the Malls to Main St. in Warwick to the Warwick Station to Post Rd. and back to Elmwood. But you would have to run that loop in two directions or people would be on it an awfully long time.

It's really hard for me to envision a linear line that would have enough usage to justify it's existance, unless it is fairly short. Like from Wayland Square to Olneyville Square using Angell and Waterman on the East Side and Broadway and Westminster on the West Side.

i don't picture this going farther than maybe the nearby towns (north providence, pawtucket, and maybe east providence and cranston). angell and waterman would be perfect on the east side, both are pretty wide roads and some people aren't sure if they're 1 or 2 lanes (i'm included on that one). but there's no reason they can't use broadway or westminster for both directions (they're both 2 way roads at that point, but i'd say broadway would be better because it can sort of service both the armory and fed hill).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you would have to go all the way through Providence. Loop it around Wayland Square or something.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't that used to be the case? There was a trolley barn/transfer point in Wayland Square?

It's really hard for me to envision a linear line that would have enough usage to justify it's existance, unless it is fairly short. Like from Wayland Square to Olneyville Square using Angell and Waterman on the East Side and Broadway and Westminster on the West Side.

It would be ideal, in my opinion, to try to get East Providence as part of that loop now, especially as the waterfront there will be developed in the next decade or so.

- Garris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't that used to be the case? There was a trolley barn/transfer point in Wayland Square?

It would be ideal, in my opinion, to try to get East Providence as part of that loop now, especially as the waterfront there will be developed in the next decade or so.

- Garris

isn't there a tunnel going under the river into east providence? either that or they could use the henderson bridge or turn the washington bridge into a trolley bridge once the new 195 bridge is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trolleys don't need a loop, it's a good way to turn around trains, but not a necessity. They can stub end and have an interlocking that can switch the trains from one track to the other, the trains can then run backwards on the way out. That's the way many of the ends in Boston work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

isn't there a tunnel going under the river into east providence? either that or they could use the henderson bridge or turn the washington bridge into a trolley bridge once the new 195 bridge is done.

No, the tunnel goes through college hill and exits where the the frozen bridge starts. that is the train tunnel you may have heard about.

There is plenty of room on the Henderson bridge. It doesn't need to be two lanes in both directions without the expressway connection. I would put the trolley on track on the north side edge, have two lanes of traffic, then a ped/bike path on the south side. I'm not sure what the terminus would be in E Prov., though. A nice little transit station in 6 corners where you could then take the bus out to big box sprawlville rt. 6? I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the tunnel goes through college hill and exits where the the frozen bridge starts. that is the train tunnel you may have heard about.

There is plenty of room on the Henderson bridge. It doesn't need to be two lanes in both directions without the expressway connection. I would put the trolley on track on the north side edge, have two lanes of traffic, then a ped/bike path on the south side. I'm not sure what the terminus would be in E Prov., though. A nice little transit station in 6 corners where you could then take the bus out to big box sprawlville rt. 6? I dunno.

that's a great route (i assume 6 corners is taunton ave/waterman ave/broadway?), unless we'd want it to service the waterfront, in which case, going down 103 would be good and doing the loop on one of the rotary type areas on 103. i just see it going farther into east providence, maybe even down warren ave to the mass line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trolleys don't need a loop, it's a good way to turn around trains, but not a necessity. They can stub end and have an interlocking that can switch the trains from one track to the other, the trains can then run backwards on the way out. That's the way many of the ends in Boston work.

The surface rail I rode in Lisbon was like that. Viewed from above, the tracks going in either direction came together at the end like a wishbone. It could work for Smith, Chalkstone, Broad, Hope, and Elmwood (to name a few)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How well would a trolley system work in the snow? How much does the green line in Boston get backed up in the snow?

The greenline is almost never effected by the snow. It's more reliable than the buses. Toronto also has an extensive streetcar network and one would assume that they have tackled the snow issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 year later...

I take the train every day from PVD to Boston.. These escalators that have been broken for what seems like a decade are STILL under construction..

Mitch Hedberg said : "I like an escalator, man, 'cause an escalator can never break. It can only become stairs. There would never be an "Escalator Temporarily Out of Order" sign, only "Escalator Temporarily Stairs. Sorry for the Convenience."

Amtrak disagrees.. They boarded up these temporarily stairs.. How long does it take to fix an escalator? Other than opening a buffalo wings restaurant in PVD (there are none that I know of), escalator repair man has to be the best capitalist opportunity in the city.. They are always broken.. So amtrak makes us working folk plod single file through the one remaining stairwell, which has to be some sort of fire code violation.. Torture..

Its seriously been 6 months.. Is this because escalator repairmen are union? Are they too busy spending time picketing next door @ Capital Cove?

I am thinking about posting a bill on the plywood barrier to the escalator, and have a running day tally like the firemen do when they whine to the public about union contact disputes with the city.

"Amtrak escalator has been out of work now for: 127 days. "

Would that make me an artist or a felon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take the train everyday as well. I wonder if I run into TheAnk and dont even know it. I wonder if I take his favored seat?

The time it is taken to replace the escalators is ridiculous, lets not forget though that it has taken years for them to even start fixing the one behind Cafe La France. The other one usually worked so I am kinda pleased that they are at least being proactive and replacing both. I think they are also replacing the stairs which might contribute to the lenghtly time. Those stairs were never graded properly. Neither are the ones we have to use know. Somany people trip "up" when climbing them because it the grade is not even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.