Jump to content

Musikprince

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Musikprince

  1. This project was to start construction in the 4th quarter! It's now mid December and there's no signs of progress. Has there been a delay that has been discussed that I might have missed?
  2. Isn't Monarch looking promising as well, at this point?
  3. Bad idea! Shaq and Tiger would be 2 global icons that are a must.
  4. Does anyone know how long it takes on average to obtain that type of permit? You would've figured that it would've been already in place if they were going to start the demo before the end of the year as suggested!
  5. We won't really know until it's built, but I'm tired of reading different reporting! We went from 32 stories to 35 and now 34! Like wtf?
  6. Ok thanks, the food hall part of things was the confusing part for some of us that don't know the attachment of the hall with the ballroom. But that clears it up!
  7. With that said, do we know if they will be imploding the building that they are scheduled to build on, or will they build on top of and around what is already there? We thought a while back that they were conducting pest control to ready themselves for demolition.
  8. I would say an improvement over the second rendering. The original version was actually pretty sweet and more slender!
  9. So is it confirmed which height they're building first? I'm under the impression that the 28 story tower is first. Is that the case?
  10. Naw he back to be closer to his beloved Hartford Whalers!
  11. Would buy 4 season tickets the first day they came available!
  12. Bring in the Rays, build a downtown stadium with about 40k and now we're cooking!!
  13. Yeah true, I'll give you that lol however it's not so much the structure as it is that stupid hat that tops the building off!
  14. I think the 33 stories should alleviate the chunky feel, unlike CSP1 where it's basically just 24 stories!
  15. The old version actually looks like the newly proposed Monarc. Im glad they changed the rendering!
  16. The older rendering was just a tall box, at least this has much more character!
  17. I totally agree on both fronts. It could've been at a different parcel but who knows what the asking price was and the pedestal is totally unnecessary! I would say phase out the wide base and save the tree if that was a solution to having both.
  18. Spenser, I get it but that history is long past and to keep progressing forward, you can't keep getting stuck in what the city used to be. It's about where do you want to go now! Im just simply saying that there's absolutely no justification to expect a growing metropolis to not build a tower for a tree.
  19. Honestly, I'm cool... ive just lived in 2 other major cities before settling here to raise a family and have never heard or read about a tree basically causing an uprising to block a new development, especially a 400' plus tower! It's just crazy to keep reading the same argument day after day.
  20. We now have 15 towers in development that are over 500'. That doesn't even include some planned projects that should be well over that height like Block 190, Railyard Condos site x 2, and 321 W. 6th. 2 I happen to stumble across the Austin thread about another new 600' tower that just got proposed and this was one of the first post from someone in the know... And here in Orlando we're squabbling over 1 tree to build just 1 tower! Smh
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.