Yeah, RJWGMU and varider, both of y'all are right. Lol. Actually, Charlotte and a couple other major cities lack an aquarium or zoo of their own, and yet, they are respectable cities, but that's beyond the point. I think I just got carried away because I'm a bit of an aquarium enthusiast and grew up with the VA Aquarium (or Virginia Marine Science Museum as it was once called). I shouldn't have said a MAJOR draw; that was a bit of an overstatement, but it is definitely an improvement to quality of the area and will make vacationers experiences in VA Beach more enjoyable. Whenever I hear about people who come to VA Beach for vacation, they almost always go to the VA Aquarium when it's a rainy day. I guess, if we can get those extensions on the starter line for The Tide, we could make it so beachgoers have easy access to the VA Zoo, too.
The way I view these new additions to the VA Aquarium are the way I view the National Aquarium in Baltimore, which is a very nice aquarium btw. If the aquarium wasn't there, I'd have absolutely no reason to go to Baltimore's Inner Harbor. In fact, the NAB was ranked as the largest tourist attraction in the state of Maryland in 2005 (well, according to Wikipedia, but I'm willing to believe it) and played a major role in revitalizing Baltimore's waterfront. Don't get me wrong; Harborplace isn't bad, but it's not enough for me to hang around there long. Other than Orioles and Ravens games, there's really not much else I can think of to do in Baltimore that I can't do back at home (I'm not trying to knock Baltimore.) Obviously, VA Beach's problem is not urban decay; that's Norfolk, but I still think additions of better exhibits will be a boon for tourism in the region. And, hopefully, so will Blackstone's purchase of Busch Gardens and Water Country (gonna miss the Clydesdales, though!).
My logic could be wrong, though. Not sure what y'all think about my take on this. One thing's for sure is that VA Beach (and the rest of Hampton Roads) definitely needs more high-paying jobs and attractions and absolutely should NOT try to take after Miami. We do not want or need to be like Miami because Miami only caters to tourist and not locals. Miami's a nice place to visit, but for a city of its size and status, how many Fortune 500 companies that are HQ'd there can you name? I'm not trying to be anti-fun or anti-progress by saying this, but I am trying to contribute to positive growth of our metro, so that we don't end up in a precarious position--like most of Florida is at the moment--sometime in the near future. My logic here could also be wrong, though. Look forward to hearing some feedback on this.