Jump to content

building story comparisons


Recommended Posts

this is information that i have run into on the net, which i found interesting. adding up all of the building stories (well, floors, actually, to split hairs), you come up with the following totals for all structures over 7-floors in manchester, portland, nashua, bangor, auburn, lewiston, concord, and burlington.

portland: 278

manchester: 194

bangor: 46

burlington: 42

nashua: 39

concord: 22

south portland: 17

rutland: 17

auburn: 14

lewiston: 7

portsmouth: 0

this does nto include approved, proposed, or currently under construction strucutres.

hope at least somebody finds this as interesting as I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What did you use as your main source for this? I'd love to do a Southern New England list (Providence, Hartford, New Haven, Worcester, Springfield, Bridgeport, Fall River...).

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

i was arguing with my dad about how much development was here and there and so forth and so we decided to do a comparison using skyscrapers.com. it was relatively easy to add them all together for northern new england cities given that they are so small...but i imag2ine doing the same for hartford and boston etc. would be very time consuming. all in all it took about 5 - 7 minutes. southern new england would take a few days and lots of patience... :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah what the hell, im not going anywhere for a few hours...ill see if i can do a few, wow, is this really how i am spending my saturday? of well. here goes nothing:

providence: 631

new haven: 595

worcester" 548

springfield" 355

bridgeport: 351

fall river: 116

maybe i will do hartford if i have time, but it has something like 50 buildings over 15 stories so it would be time consuming. i dont think boston is worth the while, maybe i can convince my little sister to do it for me lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at both of your stats and checked it out myself at skyscrapers.com (the same place you went). It's funny becuase I came up with different results and I dont know why. I double checked also.

Starting from the most-

Cambridge, MA- 809 floors of buildings 7 floors and up

Providence, RI- 422 floors " "

Springfield, MA- 311 floors " "

Worcester, MA- 271 floors " "

Manchester, NH- 119 floors " "

Portland, ME- 107 floors " "

Fall River, MA- 102 floors " "

Bangor, Lewiston, and Augusta all had 0 floors " "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't help but add in some of the proposed and under construction projects to Providence's numbers:

Current = 631

GTECH = 12

Knight Street Condos = 10

Waterplace 1 = 16

Waterplace 2 = 19

Hilton Residences = 27

Fogarty Bldg. Hotel = 13

"Atwells Site" = 25

OneTen Westminster = 36

55 Broadway = 27

Waterford Residences = 31

Total = 847

red = in-progess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just a funny fact-

The John Hancock and prudential building together equal 112 floors,

That is 5 more floors than the whole town of Portland added together (7 stories and up)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I wouldn't expect any less from 2 super-scrapers like the Pru and the Hancock :)

Interesting thread I must say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at both of your stats and checked it out myself at skyscrapers.com (the same place you went). It's funny becuase I came up with different results and I dont know why. I double checked also.

     

        Starting from the most-

Cambridge, MA- 809 floors of buildings 7 floors and up

Providence, RI- 422 floors  "                                            "

Springfield, MA- 311 floors    "                                            "

Worcester, MA- 271 floors    "                                          "

Manchester, NH- 119 floors    "                                            "

Portland, ME-    107 floors    "                                            "

Fall River, MA-  102 floors    "                                          "

Bangor, Lewiston, and Augusta all had 0 floors    "                  "

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

well thank you for double checking, but i think i found where the discrepencies are coming from in our counts: you say you checked for all buildings 7-stories and up, but what it appears you really did was just count the stories listed under the high-rise section on skyscrapers.com. for this, portland sums up exactly to 107 floors. you are right. but i said all buildings 7-stories and higher. so this means that you need to sum all of the high-rises, and then sum all of the low-rises (found in a separate location on the website under "other buildings") and put the two together. under portlands low-rise category there are at least five 10-story buildings and a few 11-stories listed. put them all together and you have 278 total for all buildings over 7-stories. if this is not what i came up with the first time around, then it ought to be close (remember i was doing this by eye and it is easy to miscalculate sometimes). but you should remember to check both cetegories and add them together, that is why i said all buildiings over 7-stories, because there is no way portland would beat oout manchester just in terms of high rises, it doesnt even have a 20-story yet and manch has 2 or 3 i think. it is only when you include all of the smaller structures that portland stands out. double check me again if you wish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just a funny fact-

The John Hancock and prudential building together equal 112 floors,

That is 5 more floors than the whole town of Portland added together (7 stories and up)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

well boston itself is 9-times the size of portland. comparing the two metro regions, the size difference becomes even greater. and as i showed before, your calculations were off, so added together, these two boston skyscrapers actually have 166 floors less than the whole town of portland added together (7-stories and up)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Portland having more 7 plus story buildings than Manchester dosnt suprise, Portland has a much fuller look, Manchester reminds me of the John hancock and prudential in Boston, the way that there kind of off by them selfs.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

i know exactly what you mean, although, sometimes i must admit, i wish portland had a building or two that looked out of place, just so that we could fill in the blank area around them...we need more height!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.