Baffling that folks can look at a proposal from a developer who appears to have bought parking-only facilities expressly to tear down, replace with less parking space than currently exists on the site (apparently using automated parking lifts to subordinate that use to a degree no other project has done in Nashville), throw in 266k square feet of new housing and retail, upgrade some iconic public spaces.... and come away thinking that LENDERS/DEVELOPERS should be punished, rather than whoever wrote the code that incentivizes parking three different ways while limiting other incentives to improve a historic subdistrict such that a project as clearly beneficial as this is only possible because it earns 2/3rds of its bonus height from adding that parking.
Aside from the totally wrong premise that this represents "an influx of cars" in the area, it completely ignores the real causes to promote a meme with little basis in reality.