Jump to content

subkyle

Members+
  • Posts

    160
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by subkyle

  1. 2 hours ago, Crucial_Infra said:

    Came over here to get the skinny on the Oracle news and apparently I’m the first to post about it? Anyway, congrats on the new world headquarters, Nashville! What a huge get.

     

     

     

     

    There is a Oracle thread if you scroll down

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Luvemtall said:

    Glad you brought this up, and yes it can become a very interesting and hot topic quickly! Because there’s no way that certain politics can’t be ignored. With that said, I agree with you that there’s an injustice being committed and in all seriousness needs to be addressed. In all likelihood, it will get swept under the rug by some account and go down as planned. 

    Personally I don’t see the injustice by placing the affordable homes here. No one has a right to live in the area they want and get a fat discount at the same time. I am all for affordable housing like every other decent person, but I don’t think developers should carve out the best portions of developments for it

    • Like 4
  3. 2 hours ago, Baronakim said:

    Huh?  I was referring to my opinion that diluting the venue density there would do little good and great harm there to what visitors want.  I see no problem with "corporate" venues there except ones like the silly proposal for a boring pharmacy there years ago.   I think a circus is EXACTLY what makes the area from 5th to the river attractive to so many.  Not me particularly, as I lean toward classical and opera, but I just think "character" or "diversity" is not exctly the goal there.  However, the new 5th and Broadway complex I think has added a great deal of diversity and vitality to the area.   I seldom  care to criticise such obvious success.

    I’m all for the circus growing, I agree that’s drawing in more people. Not sure if you agree or not, but it’s not the names of the artists on the signage that bringing the people in. That’s what I think is silly. More power to those peacocks, but their names on the buildings is not the reason for the obvious success.

    • Like 2
  4. 3 hours ago, Baronakim said:

    Well I remember when most of them were filled with dusty storage or old furniture or completely vacant.  Second Avenue buildings had dirt or old plank floors. They were warehouses. This isn't Paris or London.  The street is occupied for one principal reason...to have a good time.  People who party there don't give a crap for trendy shops or crystal shops or such.  There is a very small  area that is the place where people come from all over the world to visit.  I welcome the absence of pawnshops and peepshows.   Y'all don't realize how good we have it.

     

    Just because someone doesn’t like the corporate feel of these artist branded bars doesn’t mean they don’t realize how good of a thing Nashville has. I don’t necessarily mind this branding these artists are trying for, but it is a tad silly. It’s possible to enjoy not having peep shows on broad and not like the fact that these bars are doing what they’re doing at the same time

    • Thanks 3
  5. 2 hours ago, Bos2Nash said:

    Does anybody know the other five tax increase options beyond sales tax? IIRC the sales tax increase was one of the big attack points of the last referendum (anyone else remember "No Tax for Tracks"?) and it had two separate increases that went up to 10% (?) total?

    I’m wondering the same. Maybe impact fees for business, gas tax, property tax. Maybe they could hit on the corporate tax. I think I’d prefer sales tax as the way to generate $$ for transit, maybe the gas tax also.

    • Like 3
  6. 39 minutes ago, Bos2Nash said:

    Did Tony actually have approvals to go beyond the FAA ceiling? The next step for that, did he have an insurance provider willing to insure the building if/when he went past the FAA ceiling?

    I was always under the assumption that you can build as tall as you want, if codes allowed it. The problem would then be the insurance on the building, if it’s not approved by the FAA your insurance is outrageous. I could be very wrong.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.