I wrote about this topic on my blog last fall. It's really good to see the discussion ramping up on this forum as well as in the local media. I don't know that we'll get the route changed, but we're at least making a good case for Charlotte to be next on the planning sheet. These are some points that I made about why I think BRT would be successful on Charlotte. Forgive me if some of these points have already been beaten into the ground.
Charlotte Avenue for the most part, runs parallel to the proposed route and still touches most of the major institutions within the proposed corridor footprint (Charlotte and West End are separated by less than
two miles at the widest point, with a majority of their separation distance being less than a mile).
• The Charlotte corridor stands to benefit far more in the way of economic development than does West End.
• Charlotte BRT would be closer to campuses in North Nashville (TSU, Fisk)
• Charlotte BRT would be closer to the medical district (including Metro General)
• Charlotte BRT would avoid going through pedestrian choked Lower Broad, but still close enough to walk to/from
• Charlotte BRT would retain the same route as the current proposal once you cross the Cumberland
• Charlotte BRT would have potential Park & Ride sites that are closer to I-40 (on the west) and NOT in already congested areas
• Charlotte BRT would still go through the main bus terminal, Music City Central (it’s ON Charlotte!)
• Charlotte BRT could still marry up with Woodland St./Main across the river
• Charlotte BRT would go past the Legislative Plaza and state office buildings
• Charlotte BRT would go past the new Public Health Center (Lentz being constructed at 26th Ave)
• Charlotte BRT would go past Nashville West and adjoining retail (West End lacks a retail destination this size)
• Charlotte Avenue is full of vacant properties - you could practically have a plethora of choices of where to put your Park & Ride sites, as opposed to cramming them into already congested areas along West End (White Bridge & Elmington Park).
• You could potentially go FURTHER WEST along Charlotte in the future and capture more ridership among residents in Hillwood and Bellevue. West End route will stop at White Bridge - do
you honestly see Belle Meade letting a BRT line come through?
• BRT along Charlotte would also better serve the communities it bisects. The population that lives along the Charlotte corridor would be much more open to using mass transit than the demographic that lives in the West End corridor (read middle class vs. affluent).
• Since Charlotte lacks the current development/retail traffic that WEnd has, the impact that construction will have on day to day comings and goings of drivers/pedestrians would also be lessened.
A list of west side neighborhoods a West End BRT would directly service:
• Cherokee Park
• Whitland
• Whitworth
• Richland/West End
• Hillsboro/West End
• Vanderbilt
A list of west and north side neighborhoods a Charlotte BRT would directly service:
• West Meade (northern portion)
• Hillwood
• Croleywood
• Beacon Square
• Charlotte Park
• White Bridge
• Urbandale/Nations
• Sylvan Park
• Sylvan Heights
• College Heights/Clifton
• Hadley/Washington
• FANG
• Watkins Park
• Hope Gardens
bwithers made a great point. While Charlotte has it's eyesores and rough spots, a good majority of the neighborhoods along Charlotte are not poor communities by any stretch of the imagination. So I really don't think that having "Charlotte Ave folks" riding the BRT is going to continue to label mass transit as something "only for poor people". If the bottom line here is ridership=success, then the MTA stats in the article alone make this a no-brainer. 100,000 more along Charlotte than on West End?
UTGrad09 - I really like the hybrid idea you suggested. It makes a lot of sense.