Please ask anyone in Chicago where they would rather see a game, Comisky or Wrigley. Had any land been available at that time at anywhere near a competitive price, the Sox would not be there now. You may recall there was a serious threat of taking the team to St. Petersburg, and it was only after the Illinois Senate got involved that a deal was struck. Any and all stadiums since then, Cleveland, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, St. Louis etc have taken an urban setting, preferrably with a city view.
Furthermore, Wrigley attendance was 3.3 Million vs 2.5 Million for the Sox, both first place teams, that is about a 25% difference.
There are plenty of restaurants within driving distance of the site, and I am sure there would be a few more if the stadium was built there. I personally cannot see one similarity between the property that the current baseball stadium sits on and the Eastland mall site - not one.
Part of my point exactly! Driving Distance! Balantyne or Lake Norman are in driving distance, and once someone gets into their car, and they are not likely find parking at a restaurant within driving distance, they will move on. That means the Eastland Mall site is a destination, just like Fort Mill.
If you come to a Bobcats, or Checkers, or Panthers game, and don't want to immediatetly get into traffic, you can stop at any number of places for a drink or food while you wait for the traffic to abate. Eastland Mall has heavily traveled streets bounding it, not exactly inviting to cross.