I wouldn't be suprised if the city uses the site ' temporarily' for parking - at this point nothing suprises me with this pipe dream of a project. There are other, much more desireable, lots to develop downtown that would at least get foot traffic from the 9-5 set. This project just furthers the perception that hartford cannot handle large scale privately financed projects. Nitkin stands to reap huge rewards if the development is a success, however only suffer minor losses if it is not, and he, along with every other developer the state/city have tried to work with want to bear less of the almost non existent risk inherent in the deals presented to them! Why does hartford continue to pour money into projects like this? Remember when they did an audit of the companies that they had on a list that had 'expressed interest' in leasing space, and they found out most if it was B.S.? most of the companies hadn't even heard of the project! There has not been 1 large, privately financed project in the city for almost 20 years. is hartford considered that bad of an investment? yes northland has done some development, however, it has been to this point heavily subsidised by the state. there is no way hartford 21 would have been built if not for rowland's 6 piliars, absolutely not. that does not mean it isn't a good project or that i am not happy it got built - i am very happy! Of course something will probably get built, like the article says, the city/state have poured way to much money into it not to have SOMETHING. like everything else, it will probably be a scaled back, half-a$$ed, phantom of what it should be.