Jump to content

Musikprince

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Musikprince

  1. 9 hours ago, JFW657 said:

    I know I'll be seen as a heretic around here for this, but like Zoi House, I hope it never gets built.

    IMO, it's too massive for that neighborhood and those kinds of huge buildings are destroying the charm of Eola South.

    I'd like to see the St Regis stay where it's at and some narrower, smaller footprint building go up there instead. 

    This thing is just another big, fat, land gobbling chunk.  

    Density at 33 stories!! Nuff said

  2. 1 hour ago, orange87 said:

    35-Story Church Street Plaza Phase 2 is a go!

    BREAKING: BUILDERS REQUEST PERMIT TO DEMO THE BALLROOM

    Article: https://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/news/2021/09/07/orlando-florida-mixed-use-apartment-office.html?fbclid=IwAR2bCAG7qsMSfdp918X6Ux3qzZ3lyjPtwR0DST66r4tHTWbxw2gp7soudZ4

    Does anyone know how long it takes on average to obtain that type of permit? You would've figured that it would've been already in place if they were going to start the demo before the end of the year as suggested!

    • Thanks 1
  3. 55 minutes ago, prahaboheme said:

    It’s confirmed that the Presidential ballroom is to be demolished and replaced by this development while the Bumby Arcade and Orchard Garden will remain and incorporated into the food hall. 

    Ok thanks, the food hall part of things was the confusing part for some of us that don't know the attachment of the hall with the ballroom.  But that clears it up!

  4. 26 minutes ago, prahaboheme said:

    Height aside -- I would be more excited with how this building interacts with the yet to be built food hall and an integrated Sunrail station. 

    If this were truly a mixed used office and residential / retail component that has access through Church Street, this may be the development that finally pushes CSS into a new era with some consistent pedestrian activity.

     

    With that said,  do we know if they will be imploding the building that they are scheduled to build on, or will they build on top of and around what is already there? We thought a while back that they were conducting pest control to ready themselves for demolition. 

  5. 9 hours ago, Flotex said:

    It would be nice if this one, the Radisson tower, the Sparrow one and Church Street 2 get built.
    4 medium size towers.... Orlando would look a little more like a real city
    We'll see, I am not holding my breath.

    Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
     

    Bring in the Rays, build a downtown stadium with about 40k and now we're cooking!!

  6. 2 hours ago, orlandouprise said:

    100% this

    I liked the thinner slender design before. This is another fat chunky building that I fear will morph with the waverly in front to form one gigantic fat blob.

    looks a little too Miami Beach-ish for me. The other design seemed more refined...

    I think the 33 stories should alleviate the chunky feel, unlike CSP1 where it's basically just 24 stories!

  7. 13 minutes ago, spenser1058 said:

    Orlando’s not Austin (not to take away from Austin - it’s a splendid place and I’d kill for an H-E-B here)

    Austin, however, has a built in advantage for its downtown-it’s a state capital. Those cities grew out from their downtowns as the core of their regions (Atlanta and Nashville, cities where  I lived, were similar in that regard).

    Otoh, downtown Orlando was never the center of the region.

    In fact, had it not been for a sleight of hand by Jacob Summerlin, Sanford was supposed to be the major city hereabouts.

    Anyway,  it was decentralized from the beginning and became more so after WWII.

    Trying to make downtown something it never was and never will be hasn’t worked so far and is probably not going to change.

    A successful city is all about its sense of place. May I recommend a review of how Central Florida came to be? I would be happy to recommend some books and articles on our history and UCF has some fine courses on our local history, if infrequent.

     

     

     

    Spenser,  I get it but that history is long past and to keep progressing forward, you can't keep getting stuck in what the city used to be. It's about where do you want to go now! Im just simply saying that there's absolutely no justification to expect a growing metropolis to not build a tower for a tree.

  8. 1 minute ago, JFW657 said:

    I wouldn't take it all too seriously.  

    Honestly, I'm cool... ive just lived in 2 other major cities before settling here to raise a family and have never heard or read about a tree basically causing an uprising to block a new development,  especially a 400' plus tower! It's just crazy to keep reading the same argument day after day. 

    • Like 1
  9. 26 minutes ago, JFW657 said:

    Above all else, this is an opinion forum.

    People express opinions here.

    There is no guarantee that yours will agree with them all or that they will all agree with yours.

    But don't worry.... opinions won't hurt you.

    BTW, in my opinion, I hope the design gets scaled back.

    Not only to save the tree, but so that the neighboring building won't need to be demo'd as well.

    Cool.

    Maybe I'll join up over there too.

    Sounds like my kind of place.  :thumbsup:

    We now have 15 towers in development that are over 500'.  That doesn't even include some planned projects that should be well over that height like Block 190, Railyard Condos site x 2, and 321 W. 6th.

    I happen to stumble across the Austin thread about another new 600' tower that just got proposed and this was one of the first post from someone in the know... And here in Orlando we're squabbling over 1 tree to build just 1 tower! Smh
    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.