Jump to content

Urban Cowboy

Members+
  • Posts

    615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Urban Cowboy

  1. 1 hour ago, Owenorange said:

    Just came back from SFO, and holy crap their B (Harvey Milk) terminal is absolutely beautiful. It’s like the whole terminal is a boutique hotel, water bottle filling stations as soon as you get through security, great local food options throughout, comfy chairs, amazing art, and three (THREE!) children’s play areas. 

    The bathrooms there are gorgeous, too

    • Like 1
  2. 11 hours ago, Ryancharlotte2 said:

    Hi friends - I am looking to buy a apartment/condo in south end but I am very new to this all! I have really enjoyed reading about all the new exciting properties coming to south end. I currently do not live in the area so pardon my question but what is the best way to find upcoming condo/apartment developments?

    Hi Ryan! I sent you a PM. I’m a realtor here, and would gladly sit down and review condo and apartment options with you. Welcome to Charlotte!

    • Like 3
  3. 1 hour ago, AirNostrumMAD said:

    Attitudes like this may be why Ballantyne and South Charlotte want to break away from the rest of Charlotte and form it's own city of "Providence".  Ballantyne area is no closer to the Center of Charlotte than Huntersville, Cornelius or Davidson.  Ballantyne is absolutely closer to uptown than Cornelius and Davidson. Huntersville and Ballantyne are probably equidistant - but Ballantyne feels like it's more a part of Charlotte because of connectivity. This is a personal opinion of mine and is obviously subjective. I was unaware of the Ballantyne and South Charlotte independence movement so I will need to read up on that.

    Would you be happy if Ballantyne and South Meck broke off? No.  But if they did, could you blame them? People move to those areas because they choose to be a part of those communities instead of more in-town neighborhoods. Ballantyne is its own thing and that's ok. People wanting that lifestyle choose to live there and enjoy better schools, more house for the money, and a suburban lifestyle with fewer headaches. If they wanted to become Ballantyne, NC so be it. But Ballantyne would not exist without Charlotte. Same with the Cobb County and Buckhead arguments ongoing in Atlanta.

    North Mecklenburg has an equal say as much as the rest of Mecklenburg County. And if North Meck is brushed off as a "suburban settlement", then I think it's fair to say Charlotte is also a suburban settlement ringing a Tall office park. What I said, was: "The silver line corridor needs far more economic help than the suburban settlements that 77 serves - and it will make Charlotte better/stronger. " I am not brushing off Huntersville, Corntown, Davidson, LKN. My point is that people choose to live there and then subsequently complain about traffic and access to Charlotte. And those areas are by definition suburbs. 

    Charlotte is very close to the density levels of Huntersville and Davidson. And Charlotte is less dense than Cary, Raleigh & Durham.  I don't have density data easily accessible, but subjectively Charlotte feels much more dense than Huntersville, Davidson, Cary, Raleigh, and Durham. If they're close, I think this is a classic case of the data being skewed to make a case -- because how could someone say Cary and Charlotte are in the same class regarding transit needs caused by density? Or Huntersville?

    If downtown Davidson is just barely a one-sided block, Downtown NoDa is just 1 double-sided block...  I love Davidson. So no hate in my commentary. My point is that it's quaint, charming, walkable, and SMALL. It truly is a college, and then a small strip with a handful of restaurants and stores. Do we want it to densify by plopping a commuter rail station right downtown? If I lived in Davidson, I would say no. NoDa is objectively more vibrant and larger than downtown Davidson. Not sure the connection to the conversation here - but since you brought it up. Look what the BLE did to NoDa and will continue to do. That's because these rail lines are economic generators. Do you want Davidson to become NoDa with giant apartment buildings and pricing locals out? If we're talking about ridership solutions - Rapid Bus Transit is the solution for north meck (If you can convince people to ride a bus). If the goal is to change the character of the lake towns, then by all means build a rail line separate from NS and connect the dots with transit oriented developments in all of the small downtowns. 

    Lake Norman exist within Mecklenburg County. Therefore, they have a say in Mecklenburg County politics. And Mecklenburg County should represent their wants and needs equal to Charlotte. Maybe exclude LKN from CATS and they can form their own transit system. & Charlotte can build the Silver Line on it's own. At no point did I say that the residents of north meck should not have their voices heard or represented. We live in a city and a county, like everyone in this country, where our tax dollars don't always directly benefit us the individual - but may impact or improve our neighbor's lives down the road. I'm ok with my tax dollars being spent on the red line - I just don't think it's a priority because people who live north of 485 bought there knowing that traffic and access issues exist. And I think the constant complaining and narrative is tiring. The NS red line plan is not going anywhere, and building a standalone line is prohibitive because of the suburban sprawl up that way. So if the goal is to alleviate traffic pressures, I'm all in favor of a reasonable plan like a rapid bus transit. And I think that the silver line will benefit Charlotte and therefore all of Meck (and the region) much more than the red line. A healthy Charlotte is a healthy region. It's not the other way around, truth be told. That's why as a COUNTY we all need to be visiting, dining, and spending money in uptown as much as possible. It is our core and vital for our growth.  

    @AirNostrumMAD I didn't intend to set off on a tribalistic tone with my initial comment. Please see above for clarity and replies to your remarks. We all have opinions, and we may not see eye-to-eye on this topic. Transit is interesting conversation and I think we all need to ask ourselves if the goal is ridership/alleviating congestion -or- economic development. My support for the silver line is purely for the economic benefits. 

    • Like 3
  4. 1 hour ago, KJHburg said:

    ^ Great looking building and I think it is a nice change for new office buildings.  When Duke Energy swooped into lease all the office space at Optimist Hall no one else got a chance to be over there and this will solve that. 

    My hope is that Duke vacates their space and allows for more vendors. I get why white point wanted Duke as a tenant and financing. But at this point I think the larger the food hall, the better the experience. And optimist hall could be bigger IMO. 

    • Like 4
  5. The photos of the E expansion are very underwhelming. Granted, it's an improvement over the open air gates it's replacing. But it amazes me that the airport will give us A North and the plaza (both beautiful and functional). And then they give us this net new expansion that is a glorified barn. They could have done a soaring ceiling here and opened this up like the end of D, but this looks dark and small already (fitting for E). It's just disappointing because I've recently flown into the new New Orleans airport, the Harvey Milk terminal at SFO, new SLC terminal, and the DCA project journey concourse that replaced 35X-- and they all blow A North and the plaza out of the water. I get that we're a busy airport and can't shut down a concourse for construction, but for the amount of money we're spending I feel like we're mainly getting B- aesthetic improvements and not addressing some of the major passenger complaints of our airport. 

    Here are some photos. All of these improvements have a WOW factor that give a great initial impression for their respective cities. Just hoping that our airport will continue to feel more cohesive with time. 

     image.thumb.png.8f7e66f3218ab33a73771ad86a78a0b6.png

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.