Jump to content

chuckyvt

Members+
  • Posts

    106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chuckyvt

  1. 16 hours ago, DirectorBob0209 said:

    Facebook comments on the City's Official post toxic. 🤣

    I am really curious how much of the Facebook hate comes from folks that actually live in or near the city.   

  2. 3 hours ago, vicupstate said:

    A townhouse project was approved for the corner of Pendleton and S. Calhoun St several months back. I can't seem to find the land subdivision plans which the PC approved. Regardless, the site has been cleared. 

    I want to say it was five townhomes?  I kept hoping that somehow someone would come in and purchase that property to turn that old gas station into something like the universal joint.   Obviously that didn't happen.  

  3. 4 hours ago, gman430 said:

    This project isn’t going to get approved. There are just too many people on social media against it. Sad. :( Wish all of these NIMBY’s would move back to Asheville. People just don’t seem to understand how this project would be a good thing. They just think it’s going to block out the sun and mountains while making traffic worse. 

    Well perhaps we need to start a YIMBY group to contour it.  

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  4. I sent an email to my the city council rep for my district (Lilian Brock Fleming) and two at large (Dorthy Dowe and Russell Stall).  Dorthy Dowe responded this morning, and I thought it was worth sharing here:

     
    "Thanks for reaching out to share your support for the Mosaic project. I do believe that property will ultimately be developed but I am not supportive of the proposal to rezone the parcels to C4 at this time. Rather, I believe the new Greenville Development Code (GDC) which we are expecting a draft of in the next two weeks should govern this area. The new GDC for these parcels should be based on the West End Small Area Plan that was adopted by Council in 2021, incorporating the vision of this area primarily as a “cottage precinct”.
     
    I appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective.
     
    -Dorothy Dowe"
     
    A cottage precinct doesn't sound like something that will significantly move the needle on the thousands of housing  units Greenville is going to need in the coming years.   

     

    • Sad 1
  5. For vehicles, the sharp angle between South Main and Pendleton/Vardy restrictions sight lines and movement compared to a typical T intersection.   Left turns are prohibited between South Main onto Vardry.     Traffic from Vardry is permitted to turn right onto South Main, as long as you're able to make the sharp turn.   For vehicles, perhaps ineffective is a better term for this intersection.

    For pedestrians, its terrible.  I feel like I'm playing frogger with my family each time we cross.  There is no pedestrian signaling, which is especially difficult at non-standard intersection, you're not sure which direction traffic is flowing at a given moment.  Its especially pronounced crossing Vardry near the intersection.  The way that traffic signal works, when you look and see red, you assume that means its safe to cross, but that is when traffic from Pendleton has a green light to continue straight onto Vardry.        

    • Like 1
  6. On the Leach St project I think the developer probably agreed to do a traffic study as a compromise with the community to make sure they are checking all the boxes.  The density isn't going up all that much, Ethel St is arguably underused, and has connectivity to Leach and Calhoun, so expect the traffic analysis to come back and say its ok.  The community also has concerns tied to Ethel and Leach being poor streets without sidewalks, and that is absolutely valid.  But the flipside is about the only way we're able to get sidewalks developed is to allow developers to build and require sidewalks as part of the project.  Outside of downtown the city does a poor job of prioritizing and building sidewalks imho. 

    For the potential Pendleton St redevelopment, its a similar story.   Pendleton St is currently overbuilt/underutilized, as it used to be the main entrance into downtown from the west prior to Academy being built.  The biggest issue for a development there would be that the South Main/Pendleton St intersection is a mess, and its proximity to Mallard compounds the issue.   Perhaps something can be done to improve these intersections as part of the development there if it does materialize.

    As a side note, I think an interesting idea for this area would be to redirect/re-sign that one block segment of Anderson as South Main Street and close the section of Main St in front of Saint Paul UMC.   That removes the poor S Main/Pendleton intersection.  You could turn that closed section of Main St into a small pocket park, and perhaps some parking for the church and the business across the street.  I'm sure it would be a battle to pull something like that off.                

    • Like 1
  7. On 8/17/2021 at 4:48 PM, Joey_Blackdogg said:

    I had always hoped that this little building would be redeveloped similar to the Universal Joint on Stone or with a volleyball court out back like Irish Pub on Pleasantburg. So much potential but... more townhomes. Great.

    I 100% agree.  I was really hoping for something like that.   However the renovation costs, plus lack of parking, it may never have worked.  

  8. On 8/18/2021 at 11:19 AM, transplant08 said:

    it sits across the street from a substance recovery halfway house. So I'm thinking alcohol wouldn't fly.

    The halfway house received a zoning exception that most of the neighborhood opposed.   That, and it already being zoned redevelopment district, i don’t think they would have much of a leg to stand on.  

    On 8/4/2021 at 4:54 PM, vicupstate said:

    Wharton Townhouses

    801 Pendleton

    Seems like there should be a way to easily get a 5th unit in here.   

    The lady that owns this lot and is doing the development is a long time resident of the neighborhood.   She reduced the number of townhomes based on the typical density complaints from the Sterling neighborhood association.   I think she’s leaving quite a bit of money on the table, but obviously not my call.  

  9. The West End Neighborhood association (or association leadership anyway), has generally said that for the association to support the development, the developer has to significantly reduce density.    Part of a broad "Density is bad" stance that is common among the neighborhood associations as far as I can tell.   I tried to give some feedback that they would probably have much more success targeting more specific actions to make developments more walkable, more amenities, etc vs broad opposition.   They also have a new president for 2021, we'll see if anything changes.   

  10. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me to include County Square in the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood and zoning district in the first place.  I suspect people just never expected County Square to be redeveloped when this was originally drawn up.   Hindsight is 20/20 I guess.   

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.