Jump to content

Why aren’t historical architectural styles re-used more often?

Recommended Posts

I’m not an architect or design professional, so my views of architecture are amateur and uninformed.

Question: significant construction in cities was done from 1880-1914 re-using historical styles such as Neo-Renaissance for whole areas.  As those styles are still considered attractive, why aren’t they used more today?

Today we see whole neighborhoods built using boxy architecture, especially for apartments.  That style is not time-tested, and in a few years, those buildings may be viewed as outdated.  Surely that will affect the values of those buildings.

Why not just use a traditional style (Federal, Edwardian, Neo-Renaissance, etc.) instead of body styles today, and ensure that a building will continue to be considered attractive?  Surely historical ornamentation and exteriors of buildings could be mass-produced, with costs the same no matter what style is used.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.