Jump to content

JimmyGreaves

Members+
  • Posts

    498
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JimmyGreaves

  1. The second city council vote on the revised Comprehensive Plan will be coming up soon. Bob Azar, DPD Principal Planner, mentioned the importance of the new plan from this perspective at the September 17 city council meeting:

    From The Providence Journal: Providence City Council questions Comprehensive Plan timetable, September 18, 2007

  2. When is it gonna be tomorrow already?

    Providence City Council is looking ahead to waaaaay beyond tomorrow:

    From the October 29, 2007, Committee on Urban Redevelopment, Renewal and Planning Agenda:

    Resolution Requesting the City Council to establish a Panel of Futurists to Envision Life in Providence in Twenty, Fifty and One Hundred Years.

    Providence URRP Committee -October 29, 2007 06:00 PM

    You can't accuse City Council of a lack of strategic thinking.

  3. 3 hour time differences suck! i'm starving because it's supposed to be dinner time, but it's only 4:00 here in CA. i've been awake since 6am EDT, and the last time i ate was at 10:30 CDT (unless you count the pretzels on the plane that i had at like 1:00 CDT).

    and UCSD has nothing within walking distance! talk about sprawl (something i noticed coming into SAN). it's really pretty out here, but it's sprawl hell.

    Nice to see you were able to prove your identification to the airlines. Did the state send you your license?

  4. One of the big problems this illustrates is that, in my opinion and observation thus far, much of what fuels opposition of or support for many community initiatives (especially by reactionary neighborhood groups) is anger.

    I'll take your point one step further. In my opinion, the anger is the result of a broken trust between parties, most likely promises/commitments made by government or developers were not fulfilled. The hard part is that once that trust is broken, it is extremely hard to restore.

  5. "carpetbaggers" will never be seen as looking out for those specific communities.

    I agree that there is a lot mistrust. But if that argument was true in all cases, then surely the neighborhood would not trust a developer from another STATE vs. the people who are from same city, while maybe not from the same neighborhood. How is a Tennessee developer able to win support from a Rhode Island neighborhood, and what can be learned from their approach so that those who advocate for urban-friendly and beneficial development in neighborhoods other than our own can build trust as well? That is a key question.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.