Jump to content

Eastern

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Eastern

  1. On 5/7/2024 at 9:44 AM, allthingsplanes said:

    Question for you all (without us being able to do anything about it).  I had to take my mother to the airport the other day, and the drop off area was terrible.  Cars were stopped at least 2 deep, and cars that were along the curb were trapped there trying to get out for several minutes.  One car was diagonal across both lanes, just stopped and not doing anything.   People kept pulling up and stopping in the 2nd lane, blocking others in.  So my question is, why, with all of the rework to the drop-off and pick-up areas, did they not do a center island with curb access from 2 sides?  Or at least do like some airports and clearly mark off 2 lanes for stopping?  And why don't they have traffic control people out there getting cars out of the way?  It's such a cluster for an airport that has made so many worthwhile improvements...

    A solution I saw at a couple of international airports is the use of diagonal parking at drop off, like we see used in the downtowns of some old towns here in NC. There were no cars being blocked in and cars could ease in and out quickly. There wasn't any need for traffic control personnel unless someone overstayed the time limit.  CLT would have benefited too from having multiple   drive-up terminals instead of trying to cram all the arrivals in at only one.

    • Like 3
  2. 3 hours ago, CLT Development said:

    Going on WSOC to respond to Speaker Moore's comments, so send your well wishes and any verbal ammo you have.

    Moore claims Charlotte is not dense enough for rail. All of Charlotte isn't , so you start building from the areas that are high density now and build out. He mentions the blue line and it's success so he should know that can work. The city could run a line from Midtown through the Pearl district to the airport with a grand link at the blue line junction, then extend eastward from Midtown as neighborhoods get denser. Atlanta has wider interstates than Charlotte and still has worse bottlenecks, so does Houston and a lot of cities with plenty of miles of interstate. He should know we can't solve traffic issues by building highways alone.

    • Like 4
  3. 10 hours ago, FLOSC843 said:

    Shots fired. ATL has had enough😆 Wasn't sure where to put this but I guess here is just as good a place as any. "Atlanta mayor claps back at Charlotte" courtesy of house speaker Tim Moore's comments on transit.  Also included the  Axios article that featured Moore's original comments.
     

    https://www.axios.com/local/charlotte/2024/02/28/atlanta-mayor-claps-back-at-charlotte

    https://www.axios.com/local/charlotte/2024/02/26/berger-moore-transportation-plan-transit-roads-first

     

    All's not lost on the referendum. Isn't he running for US House district 14 which includes part of Northern Mecklenburg County? People there have a chance to send him  back home with a loss in November.

    • Like 1
  4. A few years ago the state gave counties the option to have a referendum to have a 1/4th cent sales tax increase. Did Mecklenburg  County ever do that?  If not, it could be a small source of revenue for the rail lines. Add this to some other creative options and they may generate enough revenue to start the Red line, some road improvements and maybe a short piece of the Silver line.   Another piece of legislation, Senate bill 696 titled Local Option Sales Tax Flexibility was considered in the 2023 session. It would give some counties the option of adding an additional 1/4 or 1/2 cent sales tax by  referendum.  Last I could find, it was referred to a committee on Rules and Operations  of the Senate. It needs to be resurrected.   In a related matter that is critical, the NC speaker of the House who is from Cleveland Co, a man who has stood in the way of Mecklenburg County and Charlotte getting the 1 cent sales tax referendum approval in that branch, as you know is running for the congressional seat in the newly redrawn 14th district. This district now includes part of North Mecklenburg County and Lake Norman towns and cities. While this district was designed to lean red, this guy has been the poster child of the rural urban divide, and of despising the urban areas to the fullest extent possible to provide for rural areas. He is not a person who will or should champion the urban needs of Gaston, Lincoln, Mecklenburg and the other rapidly urbanizing areas of the 14th. His vile actions against urban areas should be blasted across the district to the point that he either loses or will have to cut a deal ie approve  or compromise on the 1 cent tax and support a referendum to get elected. He needs the support of the Northern Mecklenburg cities and towns, but unless he can find more state money, the 1 cent tax referendum needs to be approved by the NCGA  to fund a Red Line which now may cost up to a couple of billions.  Trying to get the favor of the voters is the reason he found a few crumbs for improvements on the I85-485 interchange. He needs to painfully learn that is not enough to buy this district or be elected to represent people he has in the past treated like they were his enemies. 

     

  5. 13 hours ago, kermit said:

    They are not legally able to apply for transit funding at the moment because they need permission from the right wing nut jobs in Raleigh before they can get a local funding match.

    Gateway station is fully funded, its hold up is with the private developer getting started. (The private developer is paying to build the station as part of the larger project on Gateway area land which was given to them by the city and state in return for a station). Given that this developer agreement is still in place no grant application for Gateway would be considered.

    Local transit expansion will require local match dollars to be obligated in the grant application. The NCGA must give Mecklenburg County permission before we can vote to increase our own taxes, the NCGA is currently refusing to allow us to have that vote because “taxes and freedom” or some horsecrap like that.  Tim moore did say he would be happy to give us permission to vote on a new tax that would expand roads however.

    While I am not saying that the current city government would be doing a good job of moving the Silver Line towards construction if they were able, they are not the cause of this huge missed opportunity. This is 100% on anti-urban state politicians.

    Thanks for the explanation on the train station. The city could use the resources available to extend the blue line. It has the 1/4th cent sales tax, taxes on rental cars, property taxes and add a special tax on areas that would be within a certain distance of a train station. If the city used a combination of these it would seem they could still apply for federal funding without needing to bother with the NCGA.

  6. 2 minutes ago, Eastern said:
    3 hours ago, AirNostrumMAD said:

    I’ve said it before. The level of spending on rail transit has been historical and majorly game changing. The government is hardcore spending on urban issues. Charlotte needs progressive leadership because it’s raining federal $’s even with unfriendly Republican-led states.

    The DOT will even be award billions in conversions and development along transit stations. I’ve mostly been following federal dollars for the Bos-Wash corridor + VA and my lord, I have no idea on how many dozens of billions in rail transit has been announced the last 2 years. California has had billions announced I though this year for HSR and again today a new $6Billion towards ($3B each) california HSR & Bright line Vegas - Inland Empire

    Pete Buttigieg keeps reiterating - grants will go to projects that (I) are transformative and (II) big enough grants to move projects forward rather than a bunch of small impact projects (<1 mile streetcars) or grants that can’t fully push projects to start imminently. 

    It’s been prettt obvious Raleigh was destined to be plugged into the NEC next and will have a fairly robust state-level network. I don’t think Charlotte will have as extensive as a network (geography and location of tracks) but I do think it’s the next logical extension and there Atlanta. Though I’ll be old or dead. I’m fine with Raleigh for now. 

    Expand  

    Why are the Charlotte mayor and city council not advocating for money from the fed? Are they asleep, dead? Money like this may not be available again for decades. They could at least try to get some to start on the uptown train station, extend the blue line north and south. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. 3 hours ago, AirNostrumMAD said:

    I’ve said it before. The level of spending on rail transit has been historical and majorly game changing. The government is hardcore spending on urban issues. Charlotte needs progressive leadership because it’s raining federal $’s even with unfriendly Republican-led states.

    The DOT will even be award billions in conversions and development along transit stations. I’ve mostly been following federal dollars for the Bos-Wash corridor + VA and my lord, I have no idea on how many dozens of billions in rail transit has been announced the last 2 years. California has had billions announced I though this year for HSR and again today a new $6Billion towards ($3B each) california HSR & Bright line Vegas - Inland Empire

    Pete Buttigieg keeps reiterating - grants will go to projects that (I) are transformative and (II) big enough grants to move projects forward rather than a bunch of small impact projects (<1 mile streetcars) or grants that can’t fully push projects to start imminently. 

    It’s been prettt obvious Raleigh was destined to be plugged into the NEC next and will have a fairly robust state-level network. I don’t think Charlotte will have as extensive as a network (geography and location of tracks) but I do think it’s the next logical extension and there Atlanta. Though I’ll be old or dead. I’m fine with Raleigh for now. 

  8. 14 hours ago, kayman said:

    It doesn't. The fiber optic installation into the pavement due to repaving area of installation is the most costly expenditures. There's already a regional network or traffic cameras that allows real-time monitoring of roadway conditions and congestion volumes. 

    That's why I am going to keep my foot on NCDOT's neck about how they constantly underfund Charlotte while over-accommodating the Triangle on for things a much larger urban area like a regional ramp metering system, limited-access conversion with local access roads of Independence (and possibly Brookshire). All of these things  are needed like yesterday.

    The bottleneck where westbound lanes are merging from 485 onto 85 is horrendous. It goes from 4 lanes down to one. There was a similar problem in the Triangle where 2 westbound lanes off 540 merged into one lane to get on 40 but not as bad. NCDOT fixed that a few years ago. You need to stay on them hard until they fix it. That traffic gridlock unacceptable.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.