Jump to content

Two_wheels

Members
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Two_wheels

  1. On 9/20/2022 at 1:10 PM, smeagolsfree said:

    I hope you are being funny!  Again if developers do not have to put parking in, they will not do it.

    Do you mean this from a financial perspective or from parking mandates? It still seems like developers are extremely hesitant to not provide ample parking with their projects even in the areas where they are not mandated to do so. 

    • Like 1
  2. 20 hours ago, PaulChinetti said:

    Hmm the info I see doesn’t say how much parking. Is it egregious or something?

    Parking on the project is 108 spots (3 are zip car spaces) for 129 homes. There were originally more homes and they didn't reduce the parking all that much when they took away the extra two floors of height. When we had a community meeting on it we also got them to use some of the first floor parking area for flex space and retail which felt like a win. 

    Here is Colby's letter to Planning Commission on that project - 

     

    "Planning Commissioners,
     
    Thank you for your service. I ask that you disapprove 2021SP-097-001, as its use and location do not justify additional height under the Wedgewood-Houston/Chestnut Hill Study Plan. Further, it is absurdly overparked for a parcel that qualifies for no parking minimums.
     
    I am strongly opposed to this application and have told the applicant this for the better part of two years, and yet they have made no significant modifications. I will be out of town for this hearing next week, so I will not be able to attend, but please use this email as my position.
     
    Thanks,
     
    Colby"
    • Like 1
    • Sad 3
  3. On 1/25/2022 at 5:27 PM, downtownresident said:

    He’s definitely been very effective on the legislative side, just wish he would take a more pragmatic tone when discussing development. “Kick rocks” is certainly counter-productive if the goal is to sit down and negotiate with someone. I feel as though Freddie O’Connell strikes a nice balance with these sorts of things. 

    I think it's ok to not take twitter so serious and it is a good thing for a CM to publicly show support for their constituents. Freddie does a great job as well. Hope to see them both continue on in city leadership after their terms. 

    • Like 2
  4. 3 minutes ago, nashvylle said:

    my complaint is the facade is ugly. 

    We are in a growing city with big affordability/gentrification issues... Nashville will never be affordable and you will be priced out of your neighborhood if you are denying 9 story buildings over height/traffic concerns. 

    I think some of the loudest people on this one that I have experienced are not the ones with any concern on being priced out of the neighborhood. 

    • Like 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, nashvylle said:

    I have no idea why this project has so much public backlash. 

    image.thumb.png.11192edd3d9e7a04feefb0f79152c8d0.pngimage.thumb.png.5d8c812d1293fa8d84e6bdfdf9934b6e.png

    It is a mixture of the usual NIMBY concerns -Planning Commission Opposition Comments in regards to height and development in general and then concerns around not having affordability targets in the SP. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.