Jump to content

Nicholson

Supporting Member
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nicholson

  1. On 4/26/2023 at 8:43 AM, PaulChinetti said:

    Council people for the Titan stadium deal bill:

    Vote breakdowns

    In favor: Sharon Hurt, Burkley Allen, Zulfat Suara, Jonathan Hall, Kyontze Toombs, Jennifer Gamble, Robert Swope, Brett Withers, Nancy VanReece, Tonya Hancock, Zach Young, Larry Hagar, Kevin Rhoten, Jeff Syracuse, Mary Carolyn Roberts, Gloria Hausser, Thom Druffel, Kathleen Murphy, Russ Pulley, Courtney Johnston, Bob Nash, Tanaka Vercher, Delishia Porterfield, John Rutherford, Joy Styles, and Antoinette Lee

    Against: Bob Mendes, Sean Parker, Emily Benedict, Erin Evans, Russ Bradford, Ginny Welsch, Colby Sledge, Tom Cash, Freddie O'Connell, Sandra Sepulveda, Angie Henderson and Dave Rosenberg.

    It's good to note Delisha Porterfield was opposed, and only voted in favor so that she would be allowed to make a "motion to reconsider." This was botched by Vice Mayor Shulman's confusion. Multiple CM's requests to be recognized created preventable chaos. Kathleen Murphy challenged Shulman's approval of Porterfield's motion to reconsider.  Legal dept recommended a vote to resolve the dispute. It was left to the council to decide Shulman's approval of Porterfield's motion vs Murphy's challenge to Shulman (and not allow Porterfield's motion). The CM's supporting the stadium all voted against Porterfield's motion to reconsider, by way of voting for Murphy's challenge. Total poo show. 

    *If the motion to reconsider had succeeded, the Metro Council would have been required to have another vote in June. 

  2. Motycka's piece goes into a lot of depth about how the deal might develop too. Metro Council will have to weigh in at some point.

    It would be great to see Bos2Nash's ideas, or something similar in the next round of negotiations. 

    23 hours ago, Bos2Nash said:

    When it comes to the Titans stadium. They NEED to be on the hook for all debt service and any debt obligation. The thing that concerns me is we essentially need big developers with deep pockets to come in and do proper mixed-use development. So many of the housing projects in the city have empty retail slots that are meager and not overly suitable for actual retail. Mixed income housing will be a necessity, neighborhood essentials like grocery stores and smaller office will be needed. I say this because I worry about relying on tax revenue from these future developments and when that revenue will become real. Who covers the debt related costs while those developments are built? It cannot be the city. 
     

    IMHO, 2026 is too aggressive for a stadium on this valuable of land. Their lease is for another 7 years so we have plenty of time to work out a deal and don’t need to rush it. I still think the stadium is in the right location and should not be pushed east any further. Extend the lower Broadway special tax district and have the convention center help with the bonds / financing for the stadium. 

    A few more highlights from Motycka:

    (I'm trying to resist copy/pasting the whole thing haha)

    "New York, Miami, or Los Angeles, the metropolitan tier Nashville likes to claim, do not pay for their stadiums—they make the billionaires do it... 

    This is what happened in New York (MetLife, 2010, $1.7bn), Los Angeles (SoFi, 2020, $5.5bn), and Miami (Hard Rock, $350m renovation, 2015). To build Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas for $1.9bn, the Raiders got $750m from Clark County backed by tourist taxes, the largest ever public commitment to a stadium. That deal has not turned out well for Las Vegas...

    The Tennessean has done little to find out essential information, like metro’s contractual obligations under the current lease, instead beating the drum for a new stadium, East Bank development, and a downtown riverfront.

    There are a lot of unknowns and a few knowns. The ability for Metro to service whatever loans it takes out for the Titans will be tied to a single Tiger Mart on Shelby unless more money starts changing hands quickly around the stadium. If this deal gets through—Metro Council would have to approve a lot of it, including a local counterpart to the state legislation—Metro’s financial wellbeing will be hitched to the East Bank for a generation... "

     

    _ _ _

    Just noticed your post nashvylle, and IMO, it would be great to see the East Bank develop that way, but for about $1 Billion less by renovating the existing stadium. 

    There's an opportunity cost for financing a new stadium, as opposed to other needs in the city. The Metro Nashville Transportation Plan approved in 2020, for example, has no dedicated funding source, and has a price tag just north of $1 Billion. Not that these are identical funding mechanisms, but there is some overlap. It might good to elaborate on transit funding options later, so if I do it'll be on the Transportation thread.

    • Like 4
  3. 5 hours ago, Rockatansky said:

    Hopefully. That or proper BRT in dedicated ROW.

    BRT could be installed along a Gallatin Pike, from Briley Parkway to Rivergate Mall,  with low cost / quickly implemented  Tactical Urbanism methods.

    It could serve as a pilot corridor to showcase a successful example to the rest of the city.

    Out of respect for this forum, I would like to offer the following info strictly for discussion purposes:

    Here's a Tennessean OpEd I wrote on behalf of Transit Now Nashville that outline BRT on Gallatin Pike: https://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2020/12/11/bus-rapid-transit-nashville-would-solve-intractable-problems/6512660002/

    The OpEd is a condensed version of this longer report: Quick Win for Better Bus Service

    TransitNowBRT.GallatinPike.png.dff200d3efd503ebbed38684539d33e6.png

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  4. On 4/1/2021 at 1:34 AM, BnaBreaker said:

    That's what I thought too.  I'm thrilled that they thought to (finally) include us in their expansion plans, but I'm afraid any service might be borderline useless if it doesn't provide Nashvillians with access to the Midwest and East Coast as well.  I mean, Atlanta is nice and all... but we deserve more than to be just some isolated (as Amtrak routes go) secondary outpost of Atlanta.

    Tennessean coverage of the Amtrak proposal: 

    'OMG': Amtrak service from Nashville to Atlanta is now in Biden's transportation plan, too

    Daniella Medina
    Nashville Tennessean

    https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2021/04/01/amtrak-nashville-routes-atlanta-biden-transportation-plan/4839151001/?fbclid=IwAR0WutHaFyuRvXQTfx2azfCUTdzH9ia-BZ5DTQOs8HQttXDeO7dPhOhwIMg

     

    Here's an article they did from a year ago that includes a poll for which route people want the most:

    https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2020/01/15/where-would-you-want-amtrak-routes-nashville-take-you/4480828002/

    PollImage.png.fea30f54082f9c9a4b182decbf3e9e34.png

     

     

    • Like 4
  5. 2 hours ago, timmay143 said:

    Shopping theory/psychology.

    Charge a crazy fee ($50.00?) made at rental.  The fee is only returned when scooter is "returned appropriately."  The only problem is what is appropriate (crowd-source corrals, etc.?) and how do you determine the return (picture, gps, etc.?).  Maybe some small form of structure like car or moving vehicle rentals?

    There might still be time to submit input on how these contracts are finalized. 

    1304215581_ScreenShot2021-01-21at3_27_53PM.png.0b876281d024c31319676eb01205434f.png

    Here's the metro website for the Transportation Licensing Commission (A Division of Public Works) 

    and contact info:

    2060981103_ScreenShot2021-01-21at3_31_13PM.png.ef26e59b7a594883da4551162a7c6c64.png

    Looking at these memos, there's language about "dedicated and preferred parking areas where SUMDs can park without penalty as long as they are properly parked and upright... [and] 3. Parking an SUMD outside of a corral within the restricted parking zone shall result in a $10 fine assessed upon the operator. The fine shall be remitted to the Metropolitan Government within 60 days. Operators are not prohibited from seeking reimbursement of such fines from users whose actions incurred the assessment of fines."

    Shared Urban Mobility Device (SUMD) Memo: https://www.nashville.gov/Portals/0/SiteContent/TLC/docs/SUMD-StreetParkingMemo.pdf

    SUMD Restricted Zones Map  https://www.nashville.gov/Portals/0/SiteContent/TLC/docs/SUMD-RestrictedParkingMapDowntown.pdf

    These restrictions are limited to the most tourist-heavy parts of downtown only.

    A city-wide policy seems like a no brainer, so maybe I just haven't found that yet.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  6. On 12/9/2020 at 7:06 AM, nashvylle said:

    This Tennessean headline is very misleading, even though the article itself seems pretty on point. Nowhere in the article does it describe Councilmembers "gutting" the transportation plan. It's been remedied somewhat by an edited headline - now when you click the link, the word "Gutted" has been replaced with with "Slammed."

    I guess a headline reading "Council Voices Legitimate Concerns" doesn't pack much of a punch.

    It's true the plan does rely heavily on "opportunistic finding" such as grants, but with the city's budget issues being what they are, the immediate options seem pretty limited. Nashville is one of the only metroplitan areas without dedicated fuding for transit. Whenever we finally get around to approving that, it will help the city's annual budget process, because transit will not be competing with schools, police, etc for funding.

    In the current Transportation Plan, there is a proposal to seek dedicated funding for transit some time between 2023 and 2026. This is on a timeline image on page 157. By the time 2023 rolls around, and there's another movement towards dedicated fiunding, we will hopefully have the pandemic in the rearview mirror, and we'll have an even better idea of what the city needs transportation-wise.

    In the meantime, the Metro Council should have time to continue contributing feedback to make the plan better, and it looks like that is becoming the case. The best response to the plan that I've seen is from Walk/Bike Nashville, so here's a link to that:

    https://www.walkbikenashville.org/mayor_cooper_s_transportation_plan

    A few highlights:

    1. Equity and Meaningful Community Engagement. Equity should be embedded in the prioritization and selection of projects in a way that is transparent to everyone. As the plan is written now, we have concerns about how and if equity will be central to the selection and implementation of projects. In its current iteration, the plan is so broad most community members cannot give meaningful feedback that is specific to their experiences. 
    2. Departmental Staffing Levels. Staffing levels at departments responsible for transportation, especially at Metro Public Works and Metro Planning, are at all time low.
    3. Goals with Measurable Outcomes, Timelines and Funding. 
      While we applaud the broad goals included in the plan; the plan lacks specific measurable outcomes that will help us understand progress toward those goals. Without a funding plan with identified dedicated revenue sources, we have real doubts about how elements of this plan will ever move forward.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 3
  7. This is a good article about Mayor Cooper's updated Draft Transportation Plan. The only thing off is the last sentence about Metro Council voting on it in Novemeber. I've read other articles that say the plan would be presented to Councilmembers in early 2021.

    https://www.nashvillescene.com/news/pith-in-the-wind/article/21143680/mayors-office-releases-longer-draft-of-transportation-plan?fbclid=IwAR2j5H37vCI7WHn-rE71MnsPbwCkrBZYpf8T8mIboxZlGcW19UfcalDR-w0

    Here's a link to an updated draft of Mayor Cooper's Draft Transportation Plan:

     https://www.nashville.gov/Portals/0/SiteContent/MayorsOffice/docs/Transportation/Metro-Nashville-Transportation-Plan-2020.pdf?fbclid=IwAR30_Oe_EDyUW2x3m7Lq3sQvKkfwgt_xoostH0eUjatbak2R5JFgjx3HpCc

    The public comment period is wrapping up soon, on Oct 31st.

    Here's a link to the survey for more feedback on the draft: 

    https://hub.nashville.gov/s/request-type/a0ut00000015BiqAAE/transportation-plan-survey?language=en_US&fbclid=IwAR2Il3mKxLVYDIi7ReFqqothe4CjWPxBSsH1oQy_jxJzGuLJE-fmA_haMqY

    These are two Neighborhood Transit Centers. They're referenced in Section 2's "Financial Strategies for Transportation"

     1664392863_ScreenShot2020-10-26at5_47_20PM.thumb.png.9dc9752ab444b8008b0e5c4441c62ba2.png

    1041439255_ScreenShot2020-10-26at5_48_50PM.thumb.png.099667a1e3a2bd97807f828a8a3f4823.png

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.