Jump to content

NYtoCLT

Members+
  • Posts

    184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NYtoCLT

  1. 1 hour ago, CLT Development said:

    NINE UNITS! HORRAY

    image.thumb.png.bf6b6852d1564f4ebd570fde269d059e.png

    Maybe if this gets completed/is successful it was reviatlize the stalled development on Parkwood and Allen a couple of blocks away (and maybe the couple of developments that look stalled on Belmont Ave.).

    • Like 2
  2. 4 hours ago, CLT Development said:

    They haven't gotten inspected since May 31st, which they passed, which was for water sealing spaces, on May 30th they failed an inspection for framing. 

    She's cute tho. Would gladly take 50 more of her.

    image.thumb.png.1c33c47b531602addca71a6f6c0ab70b.png

    Would have been a great addition of missing middle directly on a (semi) protected bike lane.  Contrast that with abandoned structure currently being used as a homeless encampment and it's a pretty hard 180.

  3. On 2/7/2022 at 3:01 PM, buildleft said:

    This project includes 10 townhomes and 12 units above 3k sf retail. Great project imo and we need a lot more like it

    596666994_ScreenShot2022-02-07at2_58_30PM.thumb.png.f0dcd2435c9e0da802b1d374c14befdd.png

    Based on the lack of progress over the past 6-9 months and the homeless people camped out, this project looks dead (or at least stalled).  Sad considering how far construction got before it died.  Maybe with interest rates decreasing the project will be able to pencil again (and hopefully sitting idle for 6 months will not have done irreparable damage).

    • Like 3
  4. I really hope this comes to fruition.  With some of the other developments around this area like The Joinery there is a real pedestrian prioritized focus.  That plus the density that is going up all down the light rail from Optimist Park through Noda, this stretch has so much potential.

    • Like 4
  5. 40 minutes ago, MothBeast said:

    I thought this was Villa Heights or at least according to the Mill District branding. I do see that google maps labels it as Optimist Park though. And then most people call it NoDa. I wonder what people will call the strip of urbanity bordered by Brevard, Parkwood, Davidson/Yadkin and Matheson in 5 years. I’ve been thinking of it as the burgeoning Downtown Villa Heights. I generally think that definitions of neighborhoods in this area are bound to change. For example what we call NoDa was never going to orient itself entirely around North Davidson street, the developable area is too long and narrow to maintain a consistent character and sense of place. There are also many physical barriers that create neighborhood boundaries of their own. Now the axis for “NoDa” seems to be 36th street extending to the other side to North Tryon, while a new neighborhood has been forming in what I call Downtown Villa Heights. Meanwhile their is a bubble of development I’ve taken to calling Optimist Park that takes up much of the old neighborhood and has started to spread across the tracks with Optimist Hall as it’s center. These all feel like distinct places to me, and I’ve started considering the area around Sugar Creek station to be its own neighborhood as well called Sugar Creek. Neighborhoods are in the eye of the beholder, but I feel there is a case due to geography for their to be 4 distinct neighborhoods within the area many refer to as just “NoDa”.

    This has been my TedTalk

    I think Parkwood/Plaza/Mattheson is Villa Heights.  Surprised to see this branded as Optimist Park since I don't think there is any more cache in that then Villa Heights tbh.  I'm surprised they didn't try to sell it as NODA like everyone else who is even somewhat near NODA.

  6. 2 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:


     

    More buildings in Elizabeth torn down as plans for hotel rezoning are withdrawn

    Gordon Rago
    Thu, July 6, 2023 at 6:10 AM EDT·2 min read

    The Elizabeth neighborhood won’t be getting a hotel — at least not for now.

    Meanwhile, two buildings that were on the site for the planned hotel are slated for demolition. Crews were in the process of tearing one down last week. Another building badly damaged in a November fire is also slated for demolition, according to county property records.

    The demolitions come months after Durham-based developer Lucrum Seven withdrew its plans to rezone a corner lot in the Charlotte neighborhood for a a six-story hotel and retail. The property sits at the corner of Lamar Avenue and East 7th Street.

    IMG_0924.jpeg

    Too bad they pulled out.  A hotel would honestly be pretty great there.  Neighbors are going to complain no matter what in Elizabeth but it's probably the (realistic) use that would upset the fewest people.  God knows apartments would cause an uproar (and no one is building office). 

    • Like 2
  7. 1 hour ago, Blue_Devil said:

    McDowell street is direct access to 2nd ward and Brooklyn village from here, with the new medschool in between 

    Yea, I thought about this too.  TBD with all the construction.  Maybe after all the road work finishes this stretch will be more welcoming (and maybe breathe some semblance of life into Marshall Park (while it is still there).

    • Like 1
  8. 3 hours ago, DownEast said:

    Wow. Such intense density instantly rising here. I expect the neighborhood to stiffen up a bit and hold development to the the Morehead front. All this development in stark contrast to 2nd Ward has me feeling it will jump the highway soon, jumpstart  Brooklyn Village or some other manifestation. But, I'm loving Morehead from Mint to the Greenway right now.

    No real accessibility between this part of Moorehead and Second Ward.   South Blvd. is a pedestrian dead zone even if you could get to it so it really only opens up at Tryon.  It will be interesting to see how Moorehead looks when all is said and done though -- going to be pretty stark contrast to most of Dilworth right behind it.

    • Confused 1
  9. 15 hours ago, kermit said:

    ^ ok, I get that. But relative to a run the mill HOA the PITA factor of historic districts seems relatively trivial.  I am guessing that 70% of SFH in Charlotte are in an HOA, why are we picking on historic districts while ignoring the problematic nature of HOAs. At least historic districts strive to maintain actual neighborhood character rather than some vague 1990s low-cost, auto- centric, aesthetic. 

    If we decide to ignore the creation and continued maintenance of HOAs in the city, why do we feel like its fine to call out historic districts as problematic for supply restrictions? Seems like another suburban-privilege double standard.

    As far as HOAs, I actually could see this discussion broadened to encompass HOAs in ~10-15 years, but the most close in neighborhoods generally do not have HOAs and those are the areas where the push for way more dense, walkable housing is being pushed for most aggressively.  It would not surprise me if eventually people want to put a couple of townhomes in a random suburban HOA though if prices continue to rise.   

    As far as restricting supply, the Dilworth historic district basically took effect because people were mad about ugly townhomes in their neighborhood and it has done a pretty good job of preventing more of the same or similar.   If you were going to try to turn 2 home lots into 5 townhomes (or whatever), historic district designation makes it so you will almost certainly look elsewhere because your money has to sit patiently while it could be getting returns elsewhere.  Historic districts cut against the (I think laudable) goals of the UDO.  

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  10. On 5/13/2023 at 11:29 AM, kermit said:

    ^ is he really suggesting that Elizabeth and Dilworth will magically become bastions of affordability without historic district status?  (Or that Elizabeth is somehow different than Dilworth in anyway other than historic district status?)

    Elizabeth has gotten a lot more expensive recently, but it is still consistently ~$200K less for the same house compared to Dilworth.  Historic District designation restricts supply which definitely impacts prices but my guess is more in the aggregate and less per neighborhood.  Dilworth isn't getting materially less expensive even if it revoked historic status.

    • Like 1
  11. 17 hours ago, CLT Development said:

    Nope, I have NO idea what is up with that parcel, this is inside the neighborhood more. This is the parcel
     image.thumb.png.fd6dfccadc030c9d4d9db09697906999.png

    Interesting.  The entire stretch from Optimist through NODA along the blue line feels like it is going to rival the density of South End in no time.  

  12. 8 hours ago, CLT Development said:

    Yea agreed, the food is really bad, so are the drinks. Everything else is impeccable, and I've been talking about their attention to families for months, they were really really smart to do that. I'm excited for the market, the soju brewery, the ice cream spot under the bridge and to see the entire area explode. Once I hear about one of the stalls actually being good (I have about 8 reviews from friends ranging from passable to atrocious), I'll come try one.

    A full steak place seems like a weird thing for a food hall, but honestly the steak looked decent (the burger and chicken sandwich...weren't).

    • Like 1
  13. It has an outdoor playground plus splash pad.  Plus inside the UDM there is a corner that is an in-door play area with play kitchen, toys, etc.

    25 minutes ago, Madison Parkitect said:

    What do they have for kids? We take ours to Optimist Hall sometimes but there's nothing there specifically for them. Does UDM have a playground or anything like that?

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  14. 23 hours ago, CLT Development said:

    Nope, its all out of one kitchen controlled by Seoul Food. You can look at a few of the "kitchens" behind the food stalls and see that it all connects to the same commissary. It is nothing like Optimist Hall. I toured it a few times while it was under construction. There are some flat tops, conveyor ovens and pieces of cooking equipment facing outward but for the most part its connected.

    You assumed correctly.

    The food is not very good at Seoul or at any of the UDM spots (tried a couple), but if you have kids it is basically paradise for them so a good place to grab a beer and let the kids go nuts.  It looked like the second half of UDM will eventually open a coffee shop that isnt open yet.  That will hopefully be a good addition.  

    For all the urbanists on here, it is a pretty perfect location to bike to.

  15. 56 minutes ago, Hushpuppy321 said:

    Just went by UDM today and it was absolutely jumping with people.  Definitely going to be a hit - Very much a compliment to Optimist Food Hall.

    I biked by today and it was crazy.,  If you have kids it is going to be one of the most popular places in the summer.

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.