Jump to content

Blakcatfan

Members
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Blakcatfan

  1. I think  about this quite a bit, and am very curious to  hear from folks that know more about this than I do.  It appears to me that my scenario below is natural progression of cities, (and is already beginning to happen), and the proposed policy would help to speed up the process.  Maybe I play devil's advocate too much inside my own head, or just don't understand the bigger picture, but I've always imagined the scenario playing out like this.   If we eliminate new single family homes within the county borders,  lack of inventory would cause property values would rise, more single family properties would be are sold and replaced by denser development, more lack of inventory, more rise in value, repeat, etc.   Over time this would cause an exodus of wealthy individuals, who have no desire to live in a multi-family property?   Creating more sales of single family homes, meaning more multi-family development, and more upward pressure on home values.  Wealthy, property owning tax payers, would steadily be replaced by renters, who pay little to no property tax,  and likely spend less money on products, goods and services within the county (i.e. sales tax revenue).    Then, when a down turn occurs, there are no ties to the area for the renter, and they can just up and move to the next boom town.   I have no experience in city planning, just using Layman's logic based on things I've seen happen in other places.  Rising costs (property values and taxes) chases away the wealthy (who can afford to move elsewhere), the wealthy take the business with them.    

    I know it's more complicated than this, and I'm not wanting to start a debate, I'm just looking to gain some knowledge., and respect the opinions of everyone on this site.  

  2. Updates to the project reported in the Biz Journal reflect the expansion happening on the other side or current practice field, behind Johnson & Wales buildings, and connecting to 4th Street.  Project is expected to include a fieldhouse with up to 5,000 seats, as well as other amenities.

    "The size of the field house is not disclosed in the application but some details included reveal that it will have indoor seating for sports and entertainment events, up to 5,000 seats “for such uses outdoors on a periodic basis,” restaurant and bar uses, retail and personal services, some interior offices, mobile food and retail, among other features."

     

    Given the limited width of the additional lot, my guess would be parking and outdoor surfaces would be on new lot, while the field house and remaining fields and items would be built on the existing practice site.  Given training camp will be in Charlotte, this should move pretty quickly, or 2024 may have to be moved to somewhere else in the city.

      

    • Like 2
  3. Looks like some details are slowly coming in on Panthers plans for the practice facility.  Earlier reports appeared to reference expansion in a lot behind he stadium (across the tracks) but updates in the Biz Journal  show that the expansion will be on the other side of the existing practice field, on an existing gravel parking lot (between Johnson & Wales property and the tracks).  It would extend the site to 4th Street.  Upgrades will include a Field House with up to 5,000 seats, along with other amenities.  

    With training camp expected to be in Charlotte this offseason, at least some of this would likely have to be done quickly.

    • Like 1
  4. 21 hours ago, RANYC said:

    On a Separate Note: Anyone know what the panthers are doing to the practice field?  The Atrium Health Dome has been taken down and the dirt is being dug up.  I was about to type Atrium Practice Facility but pased on the team's performance since it opened, I don't know how much practice was happening.

    Edited 21 hours ago by RANYC

    It was reported in November that the Panthers had applied for a rezoning amendment to allow for changes to the 7 acre practice site.  The plan calls for the removing the practice bubble, moving parking and adding additional practice surfaces.  No major details were provided.

     

    • Like 3
  5. 2 hours ago, Mid South NC said:

    Cred: The Crown Club (Facebook page) 

    The Charlotte Coliseum - 

    Circa 1980something 

     

    ps, check out the (photobomb) cute 80's CLT skyline

    5169B504-BD75-4BD8-BB29-25C39D95FC38.jpeg\\

     

    Based on the dirt patches and what appear to be a significant number of work vans, it appears this photo would be late summer 1988.  Dedication was Aug 11, 1988. 

    • Like 2
  6. Howard Levine is his cousin.  Leon is his uncle, and co-founder of Family Dollar.  Howard is Leon's son, and took over as CEO when Leon retired.   Daniel is Al's son.  Al passed away back in 2016, but the family trust is still part owner of the first ward property along with Danielle, and uncle Leon.  

    Leon is in the one that has all of the Atrium stuff named after him.  

     

    • Like 2
  7. 46 minutes ago, CLT2014 said:

    The Nashville Convention Center's exhibit hall isn't that much bigger (350,000 square feet) and would not have been able to accommodate the Southern Baptist Convention either. They aren't landing major conventions despite opening in 2013 (whereas Charlotte's opened all the way back in 1995 when the entire county had less than 600,000 people).

    In order to reach exhibit space of 1 million square feet... Charlotte would need to completely start from scratch by either demolishing the existing structure or finding new land to build a brand new convention center. You need 1 million square feet on one level with access to a loading dock to compete with New Orleans, Anaheim, Chicago, Las Vegas, Atlanta, Orlando, et.... If Charlotte stacked exhibit space on the current building... there is no reasonable method to add the massive / strong elevated roadways to get trucks up to a Level 3 and Level 4 exhibit hall with the current small footprint. The recent expansion to add more meeting space would also making stacking prohibitive. 

    I was just in Nashville a few weeks ago, and after seeing how large Music City Center was I had to look it up.  They list 350,000 SF of Exhibit hall space, but that's just one contiguous space.  They have a 570,000 square foot ballroom, and 900,000 square feet of breakout space.   I don't know how it's configured inside, but the building's footprint takes up 6 city blocks, and is 4 or 5 stores tall.  

    I don't like saying this, as I am a CLT fan 100%, but we're a AA team in the world of conventions.  Given the location and monetary situation, I don't know how they would fix it.

    • Like 2
  8. 1 hour ago, beige-a-vu said:

    Does anyone know if that little two story outcrop at the bottom right (carson and tryon) is the current enterprise building being reused? Seems like the same location and size of that building.

    I believe that is the Midnight Diner, and the new tower pictured would be built where the Enterprise building currently is.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  9. On 11/29/2019 at 1:04 AM, CarolinaDaydreamin said:

    The Falcons got the loan but contract language provides Blank with future hotel tax revenue from the city totaling over $700M (present value of future money), plus other infrastructure and tax rebates.  Total taxpayer investment was closer to $750M of the total $1.6B it actually ended up costing.   

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/sep/29/why-are-georgia-taxpayers-paying-700m-for-a-new-nfl-stadium

    • Thanks 2
  10. Not sure the best place to put this topic, but with US Bank financing the Pedestrian Bridge over the freeway, what are the odds they're looking at a South End location for a new tower to anchor?  They have a 6 year lease remaining at Hearst, but are cramped for space, and cannot expand within the building.   I read the speculation on UP of a N. Tryon location, but what about them potentially adding to the growth of South End and bridging Uptown and South End both physically (the bridge) and visually (the skyline).  

    I've not heard anything, just like to speculate.  

    • Like 1
  11. I think it's clear the city was already aware this day was approaching even before Tepper purchased the team.  Even as they were agreeing to give Richardson money for his upgrades, there were conversations about needs in the future to replace the BOA Stadium.  One of the reasons the city didn't want to fund a portion of the Marcus Smith's MLS stadium pitch is because they wanted to save future tax revenue for an NFL stadium.  The issue isn't WILL the city/county/state contribute,  but HOW MUCH will they contribute.  I don't think it will go to referendum either. They learned that lesson when the Hornets left.  Tepper has backed himself into a 'Charlotte or bust' corner with his comments about making Charlotte the Epicenter of Entertainment in the Carolina's.  He can't make those kind of statements, and then move the team elsewhere within the region.  

    On a related note, has anyone else noticed while most of the articles refer to a New Retractable Roof stadium, I've seen a couple that simply references the additional of a retractable roof to the stadium.  I went back to look, but couldn't find the articles, but I know I read that.  Could just be the wording of the particular writer.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.