Jump to content

CitiWalker

Members+
  • Posts

    154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CitiWalker

  1. I don't mind tipping either.....if.... the service is good service. In fact, I would usually tip quite handsomely.  The issue I have is when automatic gratuities are placed on my bill. I just feel like it is another way that employers use to cut how much they have to pay out to employees by passing the buck to the consumer.  Also, I am a person that will not pay my hard-earned money for bad service, and I will not be shamed into paying just to pay. As I said I believe in tipping. It used to be that the people who were good at providing great service could expect good tips. Now not so much. Seems like everyone is going to be rewarded either way.  I know people count on tips for a living and that is why I do tip big time when the service is GOOD.  By the way....I hate self-checkout. I refuse to use them. That is a whole other topic. 

    • Like 2
  2. 22 hours ago, eandslee said:

    Saw this on social media just now and wanted to post it here.  It was posted about 3 days ago, but gives a perspective of ground zero at CoStar:

     

    IMG_6207.jpeg

    Looks like the main building is about to  peak above ground very soon. I can see having the first floor complete in a couple of week or at most by the end of January.

    • Like 3
  3. 2 hours ago, eandslee said:

    I thought this deserved its own thread now that construction started THIS WEEK! :w00t: Due to be completed by Spring 2025:

    https://richmondbizsense.com/2023/10/18/riverfront-amphitheater-project-ramping-up-this-week/

     

    https://www.rvaamp.com

     

    IMG_2280.jpeg

    IMG_5403.jpeg

    IMG_5402.jpeg

    IMG_5404.jpeg

    This along with the Costar development is really going to kick it up a couple of notches on the riverfront. I love the design. The only thing is it would have been nice to have some sort of well-designed covering over the seating space. But hey, I will take this every day of the week. 

    • Like 2
  4. Hey what do you say we start our own Save The Monroe Tower campaign...lol. We can all give our version of its supposed historical value and relevance to our skyline.  I for one agree that the outside of the building is more about aesthetics than anything.  Remember how old and outdated the Bank of America Building looked before they painted it white? Same ole blah brownish concrete looks up until that point. Here is a side thought. Has anyone ever thought about what the coliseum could possibly look like if it were re-skinned with modern materials. To me the spaceship like shape was really unique and provided a sort of landmark architecturally for the city. Sure, the brown color played out and made it look dated, but it was still functional.  Imagine if it had a more up to date skin like what they did to city hall.  Yeah, I know the coliseum is old, but it has good bones on it. I am not an architect but if I were, wouldn't it me more of a challenge to take something that is existing and incorporate modern design and materials with older materials and design elements to make something exciting and new that has history and stories to go along with the structure. As person who as a child grew up with not a lot of anything, I always was taught how to make something out of nothing, which meant using your imagination and ingenuity. To create something useful. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  5. Either way... everything cost money no matter what direction the state chooses. Just playing devil's advocate about the logistics of tearing it down. Could be costly and time consuming.  Hopefully a developer ( if sold) can find a cost-effective way to implement some type of adaptive re-use.

    • Like 2
  6. I have to say I love to have green space.. Who says  a park has to be supper crowded to have any value. Sometimes people wan to just have to have a peaceful stroll or sit down and relax. One thing I like about Richmond is we do have open space. That s important.  There is a need to have a balance of  green space and  increased density. No need to fill up every nook and cranny to achieve that. For starters, it would be good to simply maximize getting rid of all of the  surface parking downtown.  I also am big on adaptive reuse when possible. Apparently  the state backed out on  building a new building to replace the Monroe Tower. I am kind of happy about not tearing down the tallest building we have in the city. Anyway....the way it is  situated  feet from the highway how would that work in terms of tearing it down,. I can't see implosion. It would take weeks to clean up the debris. Also it would take years to break it down bit by bit. I would rather see green space over surface parking lots or buildings that are sitting and serving no purpose. I like the fact of having little oasis  in the middle of dense structures. It is important for cities to reinvent themselves without relying on old concepts rather adapting  new  patterns that  help the environment, promote density, and create functionality. It involves and different way of thinking. Cities evolve so it makes sense to be evolutionary in our concepts of what a city should look, feel, and function like. 

  7. 8 minutes ago, DalWill said:

    Wouldn't you?  One of the reasons why I stepped away from that website in a while, a  bunch of noises. Nothing but assumptions about city government and the mayor failing to do it's job (kissing ass to the brats of the affluent).  Same ol' song,  same kind of singer. 

    Tell me something, when people complain like that, don't they realize a good portion of city government are no more than their next door neighbors?? 😔 Might as well say your neighbors don't care about you either.

    I often wonder how many people who love to bash the City of Richmond actually live in the city. 

    • Like 4
  8. 16 hours ago, I miss RVA said:

    The second photo - is that in Carver? Just up Lombardy from the Opus?

    That is Carver. Right across from Maggie Walker HS and on the other side of the bridge from  the newly acquired  property. You can throw a rock from carver to the property by VUU if you have a good enough arm...lol

    • Thanks 1
  9. On 4/18/2023 at 5:41 PM, I miss RVA said:

    This corner? (southeast corner) Do we know of anything planned for any part of this swath - or - has any paperwork been filed with the city?

    Screenshot (135).png

    The new owners don't want to make it residential because they claim nobody wants to live near a highway or railway.....I say what? Rockets Landing.  You bought a piece of property in an urban area. Come on!.  You can do better than that. Get the picture!

    image.thumb.png.a6fef172eb76cb148b34ab48654753ef.png

    image.thumb.png.7225c5b62f057283f0da724878e68d30.png

    • Thanks 1
  10. 23 minutes ago, wrldcoupe4 said:

    Obviously they are never closing Mayo Bridge to vehicular traffic. I just don't think it would be so disastrous if they did. If we are building a new bridge, I'd rather see the money spent on creating a new crossing connecting southside and east end a little downriver since Shockoe Bottom is already a total jam-up. Also, will never happen.  Sadly, I fear we'll have to have a few pedestrians killed along that stretch of Hull before better traffic calming is in place. Hopefully they can secure funding before that happens.

    I agree that a new bridge would help further down river to the east. I live on the east end of the city.  A bridge that would connect the north side of the city to the south further down would definitely help and would make a lot of sense. Hopefully no one gets killed on Hull St. Manchester is getting more and more dense. Thats what most of us wanted to happen. Part of being in a densely populated area is congestion. Hopefully for those who wish to bike they can take advantage and park their cars and commute by bike on nice days. It's an option. Also, people can choose to utilize GRTC also a viable option.  It is important to make the Mayo bridge as efficient and function as possible. If all of the projects come to pass (especially The Southern States Silos via Hourigan) it will be a lot more crowded in that area,

    • Like 2
  11. 3 minutes ago, I miss RVA said:

    Guaranteed- there is no way the city is going to spend the kind of coin they're going to spend to replace the existing bridge deck with one that's not only new but nearly 30 feet wider, replace the support structure/pillars, etc., not to mention having gone through the long and time-consuming process of obtaining federal and state funding just to turn this into a pedestrian bridge and force the re-routing of U.S. 360. Not gonna happen. And even though the city has loosely indicated a BRT line to Manchester would cross via the Manchester Bridge - the fact that it would bypass the entirety of the Hull Street corridor and only skirt the southern edge of lower Manchester doesn't make sense. Whether this new bridge deck design can accommodate a PULSE line remains to be seen - but it seems only logical to run a BRT line directly through the Hull Street corridor and through the most densely populated section of Manchester.

    I have to agree. It makes no sense to cut that route off for traffic. It would be a big mistake. Making the sidewalks wider is a huge improvement. doubling the width of each side. It would also create more of a bottleneck within Manchester and reduce traffic flow. I would also hinder the egress of evening traffic going south from downtown. We already have a nice scenic bridge Tyler Potterfield in addition to the suspension bridge underneath the Lee Bridge. By the way.... whatever happened to   Bridge Park idea for The Manchester Bridge? The rendering looked like a good concept with more useable and functional space.

    • Like 2
  12. 1 hour ago, I miss RVA said:

    Thanks SO much for taking and post these!  I think a silver port-a-potty will have to be shined up with your name on it.  Was this photo taken from Manchester?

    I LOVE how the Pinecrest/Parc View actually sticks out above the Berkshire, even if only just barely. How close is this building to topping out?

    This was taken from the Manchester part of the city.  I just wanted to give a different visual perspective. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.