Jump to content

Ingram

MemberZ
  • Posts

    222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ingram

  1. On 10/26/2019 at 11:03 PM, CenterHill said:

    Agree with Ron.    The mayor has nothing to do with zoning.    That’s Council and the Planning Commission.    Zoning height limits are a constant gripe on this board, but I never understand why.      Building height in this city, like every city, is driven by real estate cost per sf, market demand and ability to obtain financing.      In the central core, there are effectively no height limits, and outside the core, every legitimate request for a height variance that I can think of in recent years has been granted.    If you guys are aware of any projects in the core in the last couple of years that the city has rejected due to height limits, please share with us.   

    Interesting how none of the people caterwauling could name which projects were downsized or affected otherwise by the city. This is because as stated the city doesn't do it. This is fascinating because there are posters who for over a decade have been caterwauling and natering that lie. 

    It's all meme posting. Say the same thing over and over no matter how asinine it is and the guppy school will tag along and repeat it without thought.

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, jan smit said:

    For investment reasons I am quite interested in the discussions going on about the building of a MLS-stadium at the proposed location at the fairgrounds land. I have been told that Americans find the idea of living close to a soccer stadium attractive (whilst we in Europe are not so keen). Is this correct? Also I am interested in your opinions re: the chance that this stadion actually will be built: are we talking (almost 100% vs 50/50

    "They".....sent Cooper here to be mayor.

    He won the election.

    muahahahahahaha!

    It won't get built.

  3. Yeah we should just give 10 acres of land to a billionaire so he can build a "mixed-use" development. After all he can't possibly afford to purchase it.

    What are the benefits? It's not like he has succesfully enacted policies that have created jobs for millions of Americans.

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Armacing said:

    The only reason this guy isn't run out of town on a rail is because the public is so de-sensitized to this type of corruption.  Of course, I could say they are uneducated about how economics works or deceived by "experts" with vested interests, but I prefer to give the public the benefit of the doubt... They're probably just not paying close attention. 

    The irony is that 24 years ago the public actually forced a referendum vote on the NFL welfare giveaway. Now things have degenerated so much that a Major League Soccer stadium faced little to no opposition.

    1 hour ago, Armacing said:

    Surely most soccer fans would be willing to pay the true market price for a ticket that is high enough to also fund a stadium.  What would that be, $500 per seat for a game?  Why, for a soccer super-fan, that's peanuts.  I don't think we will find many fans whose self-respect would even allow them to contemplate having their ticket prices subsidized by taxpayers... unless maybe they never stopped to think about it because they were very busy thinking about other things.  That's probably it:  Too busy to think about the philosophical implications.

    Too busy with their cravings for craft beer.

  5. 8 minutes ago, Armacing said:

    Perfect!  Now we know, folks.  That's the guy who needs to rustle up some cash to finance this stadium.  This guy is the face of crony-capitalism - - trying to use public funds to finance his business venture.  He wants the Davidson taxpayers to underwrite the loans for his project (i.e., take on the risk), but he fully intends to keep 100% of the profits for himself. 

    The only reason this guy isn't run out of town on a rail is because the public is so de-sensitized to this type of corruption.  Of course, I could say they are uneducated about how economics works or deceived by "experts" with vested interests, but I prefer to give the public the benefit of the doubt... They're probably just not paying close attention. 

    Surely most soccer fans would be willing to pay the true market price for a ticket that is high enough to also fund a stadium.  What would that be, $500 per seat for a game?  Why, for a soccer super-fan, that's peanuts.  I don't think we will find many fans whose self-respect would even allow them to contemplate having their ticket prices subsidized by taxpayers... unless maybe they never stopped to think about it because they were very busy thinking about other things.  That's probably it:  Too busy to think about the philosophical implications.

     

    Hopefully "They" sent Cooper to stop all of this.

  6. 1 hour ago, OnePointEast said:

    What's of One KVB's future? The floor plans are on the market and it shows it was last updated on October the 1st.

    Apparently they are having trouble with financing. If it doesn't get started in '20 then it probably won't get built. Most projects get built within three years after the release of a rendering.

    • Thanks 1
  7. 2 hours ago, markhollin said:

    Matthew Robinson, the principal at MRP Realty, which 3 months ago bought a 16 acre slice of River North for $42.5 million, said he's aiming to make a statement at the outset, front-loading what could be a three-phase project instead of spacing out various buildings more evenly. Robinson also revealed new details about the project's first phase, which will include 650 apartments, 90,000 square feet of retail and 50,000 square feet of office. A 4-acre public park will run directly along the riverfront, with plans calling for a pedestrian bridge to Germantown.

    Robinson disclosed the price tag for that first phase ($220 million), MRP's contractor (Archer Western), the expected start and end date (beginning of the second quarter in 2020; opening about two years later), and status of financing (equity secured, construction loan to follow as that work nears).


    Here is some of the Q&A:


    You're talking about going big right out of the gate. Why? Just doing one building would be disastrous. The first phase has to be pretty large, because we're setting the standard for a new submarket. … Most people wouldn't start with 650 [apartment] units. That's a lot to bring online at the same time. But you kind of have to start with scale when you develop a place. It’s an Opportunity Zone, so we have a 10-year horizon. We’re making decisions for the long-term.

    How do you see this all unfolding?  River North overall, I think you'll see a lot more high-rises later. We're able to go up to 34 stories. But first you need to establish the place, create an environment where people want to be. You lead with residential and retail. And then the office will come, and the office brings along hotels. It daisy-chains along. … We're trying to build a brand, and putting a limited-service hotel there is not on-brand. Hotel operators need to see the office employment over there before they come in.

    Given its size and location, River North is a logical contender for big office relocations. If one of those lands in your new backyard, how would that change your thinking? We need to go on something now. If a company like Oracle were to land behind us, we'd probably go higher-density. Our base-level assumption is that we can do more [apartments] in the next phase. But all of a sudden, if Oracle was behind us, we'd probably go with more office.

    More behind the NBJ paywall here:

    https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2019/10/04/developer-of-220m-river-north-site-its-basically-a.html?iana=hpmvp_nsh_news_headline

     

    Screen Shot 2019-10-04 at 7.21.23 AM.png

     

    Ah! Howe Daaaarrreee They!

    Now where are the pearls?

    • Confused 3
  8. 10 minutes ago, PHofKS said:

    The usual metrics of applying metro population size, corporate HQ and per capita income data to whether or not Nashville can support a fourth major league sport need to be adjusted to factor in a large transient population of tourists.

    As an original season ticket holder to Titans games, I see a large secondary market ticket supply going to visitors from other teams who circle the Titans on their calendars and come down for several days to experience Nashville's attractions. That has to be one of the metrics used in the assessment of Nashville's chances of making MLB successful. The Rays would bring the Yankees and Red Sox twice a year (12? games) and the city would go nuts unlike our other 'peer' cities.

    And Nashville can go nuts....

    33887389988_b3af93c45e_c.jpg

    As an American League city, Nashville would fill a large hole in the AL universe. There are 10's of millions in that market area that are closer to Nashville than another AL city.

    41418805121_a1339e6601_z.jpg

    Detroit (or any city) fans closer to Nashville than Detroit would travel to Nashville for (multiple?)home games. There is a whole different set of metrics that apply to Nashville as compared to 'peer' cities. 

     

    Dude, nobody would travel to Nashville for a sporting event. What in the world would make you think that? 

    • Haha 2
  9. Funny how the consensus on this forum was that the NFL was going to cease to exist and that MLS is on the rise and it's stadium should be next to the Titans stadium downtown. Now it's all hysteria about protecting the NFL. 

    It seems like any time someone wants to build a development on the east bank of the river, the pearl clutchers come out in full force.

    "How dare they!"

    "That won't work!"

    Reminds me of what the geniuses here were saying about River North.

  10. 57 minutes ago, japan said:

    You want to talk about empty seats?  Go look at attendance for teams not in the historic baseball markets...

    And?

    Half-filled and quarter-filled stadiums are a natural ocurrance in MLB. With a 162 game season why wouldn't that occur. MLB makes their money over the long haul of the season.

  11. 16 hours ago, claya91 said:

    Big baseball fan here.. several issues come to mind.

    1. We have a brand new 91 million dollar triple A stadium 

    2. MLB is having attendance issues and Nashville would be the second smallest metro to host a MLB team.

    3. The majority of baseball fans here have allegiance to the Braves and to a lessor degree (unfortunately) the Cubs.

    4. Nissan Stadium is a bottom tier NFL stadium and any further expansion would be disrupted (and necessary to host a super bowl)

     

    If that logic had merit then the Oilers would never have come. After all the two most popular teams in the region before their arrival were the Steelers and Cowboys. On top of that I don't know anyone who cares one iota about the Braves today and they are certainly not going to not go to a game in Nashville because of loyalty to them or even worse the Cubs.

     Outside of the playoffs, baseball games have never been filled to capacity. Going back to the 90s, I've seen all of the teams have games with far less than capacity crowds.

    The Super Bowl has a top rotation of Miami and New Orleans. You can definitely now add Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Those cities are going to host anywhere from one to two (maybe even three) Super Bowls a decade. The next group is Tampa Bay and Phoenix. Those two will get at least one a decade. That leaves Houston and Atlanta in the every once in a while category and that's assuming Atlanta's Super Bowl wasn't just a one off gift for building a stadium just like the Super Bowls for Indianapolis, Detroit, Minnesota, New York, San Francisco, and Dallas. 

    So that means if Nashville elbows it's way into the Miami, New Orleans, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas rotation (which it can); it will probably only get a Super Bowl once every seven to twelve years. 81 home baseball games a year over that same time span would be worth more.

  12. 3 hours ago, Tyrone Wiggum said:

    I'm genuinely interested in this thread from the perspective of why Nashville thinks it's a better fit for MLB than Portland or Charlotte; Davidson County's per capita is 15% lower than Mecklenburg County's, in a significantly smaller tv market that already has three "professional" teams (MLS is about as professional as EFL League Two, but whatever), and Charlotte is smaller than Portland.

    Butts in seats no longer drive margins for a significant majority of MLB teams; it's all about the TV contract, and though Tampa just got a massive upgrade to its deal, it's still a crap deal comparatively in a market nearly 70% larger than Nashville's. 

    So what gives?  Is it the guy who knows other famous people but doesn't appear to have any money but makes lots of loud noises?  Sincerely confused.

     

    Why?

    Because it's Nashville. Nashville has it and those other towns don't.

    These people know what they're doing. There's a reason there are at least eleven half billion to two billion dollar developments occuring. 

  13. The Tennessee Titans have had empty seats everywhere for the last five seasons for just eight home games a year. A privately funded baseball stadium mixed use development will probably get the go ahead over a near billion dollar stadium renovation for a team that can't fill the seats for eight games a year.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.