Jump to content

OBXastronaut

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by OBXastronaut

  1. A more cosmopolitan feel Mid-Atlantic does not us make. Regardless of how "diluted" your opinion on the region's Southernness is, it's still the prevailing culture IMO. We're a world away from NOVA, DC, Baltimore, and Philly, and I'd like to keep it that way.

    • Confused 1
  2. On 2/4/2018 at 11:33 AM, chris722 said:

    There's nothing wrong with Hampton Roads.  No different than New England the region just needs a defining city like they have Boston.   One of the reasons why people don't know what Hampton Roads, or the Mid-Atlantic, for example, is because there are no real defining things about it.  Like people throw DC and Baltimore into the North; apologists say Mid-Atlantic, it is a backhanded way of defining Northern Virginia but then that same crowd does not want into include Hampton Roads in that dynamic.  It is maddening.  So Mid-Atlantic will never take off for that reason.  Some people in DC/Baltimore want to be in the Mid-Atlantic and some people in DC/Baltimore want to be up North.  So go figure.

    Most of Virginia, including Hampton Roads, is considered Southern, and not Mid-Atlantic. As a Hampton Roads native and a Southerner, it's equally frustrating to have people lump us together with the Mid-Atlantic, and by extension, the Northeast.

    • Confused 1
  3. Not a fan of that idea. Just because it doesn't sound good to you (Redneck, really?) doesn't mean it doesn't sound good to the rest of us.

    I think Hampton Roads is more than a decent name for the region. It sounds unique. "Coastal Virginia" is as bland as it gets.

    If the name is not getting out there, it's probably not because of the name. Y'all said it yourselves. You see ads to visit Norfolk, Williamsburg, Virginia Beach, but not Hampton Roads. Blame that on the advertisements (and respective cities)  themselves instead of the name of the region.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. 27 minutes ago, tallguy81" said:

    I'm only 31 years old and even i'm saying no to light rail but yes to the arena and they should consider monorail instead which is not just an amusement ride anymore.  Look up the number of cities that have successful monorail systems.

    No.

     

    Aside from the cheesy Simpsons reference, it makes no sense to have a well-performing system in place and create another just because it looks fancy. You would have to create a separate station to transfer people from system to system ---> A LOT OF MONEY- much more money that you would be spending with light rail. Light rail is perfect for Hampton Roads: you can start off small and then add more cars as the system gets more use.

    • Like 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, urbanvb said:

    I wonder why Townebank is building it's regional headquarters in Richmond? If my memory serves me it started out in Hampton Roads. 

    It's just the Richmond regional HQ. Nothing to worry about.

  6. To be perfectly honest, I think Richmond will end up adding more people than that. These population projections don't take anything other than current data into account, and there are a huge variety of different variables that contribute to increases in population growth. I think that as the mess up in Northern "faux" Virginia continues to build up, you'll start seeing a lot more "refugees" (as I like half-heartedly like to call them) move down here for cheaper housing and an overall better quality of life. Richmond's been the city with so much potential for years; I think it's only a matter of time before it becomes what Charlotte, Atlanta, and Raleigh are undergoing now- minus a lot of the unnecessary and unchecked sprawl.

    In regards to space for construction, Richmond has a much larger historic street grid than all of those cities. A big reason why these other cities are building all of these gargantuan projects in comparison to Central Virginia has to do with the fact that their historic city centres were demolished for them or they never were incredibly large in the first place. There are so many historic structures in Downtown Richmond that are just beginning to undergo extensive restoration attempts; once these are all finished, then I think you will see an incredible boom in new construction ie. Raleigh or Charlotte.

    • Like 1
  7. 35 minutes ago, Blackbird Fly said:

    Time for a VCU endowment update:

    Here is the most recent report from the National Association of College and University Business Officers and Commonfund Institute, http://www.nacubo.org/Documents/EndowmentFiles/2015_NCSE_Endowment_Market_Values.pdf

    It has VCU at number 56 (of all institutions/university systems US + Canada) at $1.638 Billion 
    It has MCV foundation at number 206 at $399 Million

    If they were considered together, VCU would have >$2 Billion endowment and would rank number 44 overall. 

    I'm genuinely surprised that both campuses are considered separate schools. Whatever the case, you really get the feeling that VCU is trying to break that mold of a mid-major school and is poised to be part of a Big-Three alongside VT and UVA in this state. The amount of growth in students, money, and prestige over the last few years has been incredible. If only my school could get a football team within the next few years.

    • Like 2
  8. Of course it would be awesome if it was taller, but I think the important thing is that we're now starting to see these few blocks finally getting filled up. Height isn't necessarily important in a city (aesthetics aside); density is. Only a matter of time before the land opposite gets built up. 

    Here is the link to the powerpoint online.

  9. I'm a bit concerned about all the skyways being put in. It's a well-known fact that they limit pedestrian interactions on the street level, making them seem empty and cold. Not sure if that's what you want when building a new city from scratch.

    On the plus side, with all of the of the news coming out of Hampton Roads, it's a nice change of pace from the Charlotte-Nashville circle-jerk that this forum is sometimes.

  10. To be honest, if any place is going to get a major professional sports team in Virginia, I'm almost certain that it's going to be Virginia Beach. The 18,000-seat arena that has been discussed for the Oceanfront is all but approved (the entire city-council - even some of the most well-known NIMBY's - are in favor of it). The harsh reality is that Richmond is sandwiched between two larger metro areas (DC and Hampton Roads), and even though Richmond is predicted to be next Charlotte and Raleigh in terms of growth, Hampton Roads is also predicted to be one of the faster-growing metro areas in the country. However, it's very well possible, and likely, for that matter, that the city will get something along the lines of an NBA D-League team or an ECHL hockey franchise in the next few years. 

    The best chance of Richmond getting a major league franchise, I feel, rests with the Kickers and a potential entry into Major League Soccer. During the Men and Women's World Cup, Richmond's TV market was in the top 5 in the ratings. I've been a Kickers season ticket holder for several years now, and in the past season alone, there have been multiple games in which 5k plus showed up to see their third division soccer team. The Kickers have been harmlessly floating around stadium expansion/renovation and MLS before. Of course, MLS has been steadfast in getting new franchises in much larger markets (a second team in NY, LA, teams in Miami Minnesota, and recently San Antonio) as of late.

    If we had a multi-billionaire soccer fanatic in Richmond that cared, well, that would be awesome. 

    At least I can dream about it, anyway...

  11. Jackpot is right. I looked at the website for the architectural firm, and their project at Rockett's Landing looks to be a go (I live not too far away in downtown Richmond). This looks legit. Which is great. This has high density and features an urban street grid. Those funky curved streets? They're starting to be implemented in major cities as a way to reduce traffic speed 

    I'm pumped right now.

  12. I'm still incredibly disappointed that the Wegman's would be going THERE. Unless it's occupying the bottom floors of a mid/high rise building, I'm going to be solely disappointed. Just considering how dense (and how tall) the Town Center development was originally intended to look like (rendering below), this, in my mind, limits the ability for Town Center to truly expand past the stigma of being a plastic outdoor mall.

    DowntownVB.png

  13. I don't really take this article very seriously. The Pilot has been posting both views of the argument in regards to the Tide. It's a matter of having balanced viewpoints, even if one of those isn't really based on good evidence. As far as I'm concerned, when the City Council voted this past Spring, the deal was done.

    • Like 1
  14. Ugh, that IS really 90s looking. A sad era in the history of architecture. That second rendering looks a lot like Reston Town Center. It's refreshing to see that VB Town Center looks and feels a lot more modern and organic, in the sense that it doesn't intend to be cooped up to just a few city (or in the case of Reston, suburban) blocks. Although its located on only one side of the Blvd (as of right now) it doesn't feel isolated, it genuinely feels part of the surrounding area.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.