Jump to content

Heuristic

New Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Heuristic

  1. I forget where the Saussy part of the name comes from, but the company was started in Charlotte by 2 Dilworth architects who wanted to start their own company and design/build houses in a different way. They have since sold the company to a much larger homebuilder although I think at least Burbank (Jim I think) is still involved in the company. Back when they were local, they built a great house (and they may still...just no recent experience with them). With all that said, it is a funny name. Take all that with a grain of salt...I read all that 14-15 years ago and may have gotten some of it slightly wrong.

    Jim Burbank's early partner was Downie Saussy.  They sold to St.Joe/Arvida.  Jim Burbank, supported by local capital later bought the company back from the St. Joe Company.

    • Like 1
  2. As I read the rezoning application, the requested SPA results in a reduction in density. Dropping from some 60 plus townhomes to 43 or so houses, of which two are duplexes.  Seems like a good fit and spot on the requirements of the recently approved "Morehead/Midtown/Cherry Small Area Plan".  As best I can tell, there are no single family homes being demolished as a part of this plan.  Despite being a large area, it appears that nearly all of the land is vacant with the exception of some 1950's duplexes that are not in any way indicative of the  period housing in the area; housing that some residents would like to see recognized as part of a Local Historic District currently being promoted as a possibility.  Sadly, it seems that period bungalows are razed nearly every week by the builders already at work in the area where no rezoning is required.

  3. As already noted by a few it was a little late for the plaintiffs to start this action. As the County attorney stated, the land was used for parking for more than 20 years and the neighbors claim of violation of land usage had to be made within two decades The judge agreed and the deck will be completed.

    CPCC parking deck construction to resume

    I looked at this and yes, the TRO was lifted, but the underlying case has not been resolved. I noticed that the Plaintiff's have never made a statement in their own defense in the media. If not resolved, it will next go to a jury. The onus is on the defendants to demonstrate that the land in question has been acquired by adverse possession, a feat that is so much more challenging than what the County Atty. has outlined in the Observer.

    Among other things the land in question must be held in an continuous, exclusive and notorious fashion. 20 years alone does not get the job done.

    http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/60494/

  4. From a building code/zoning point of view, a parking lot is quite different than a parking deck.

    I'm indifferent. The parking deck is under-whelming from an urban aestetics point of view, but the pedestrian experience will be greatly improved none-the less.

    I'm not too sympathetic to the tradiness of the lawsuit. I reported it imminent construction on here at least 6 months before vertical construction began.

    Article XIV, Section 5 of the Constitution of NC declares that "it is the policy of this State to conserve and protect its lands and waters for the benefit of all its citizenry, and to this end it shall be a proper function of the State of North Carolina and its political subdivisions to acquire and preserve park, recreations, and scenic areas ...... and so on

    Perhaps the deck is not the issue central to the Plaintiffs. Perhaps the deck is instead a symptom of the real issue(s).

  5. From a building code/zoning point of view, a parking lot is quite different than a parking deck.

    I'm indifferent. The parking deck is under-whelming from an urban aestetics point of view, but the pedestrian experience will be greatly improved none-the less.

    I'm not too sympathetic to the tradiness of the lawsuit. I reported it imminent construction on here at least 6 months before vertical construction began.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.