Jump to content

camstrang

Members
  • Posts

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by camstrang

  1. 10 hours ago, smileguy said:

    I see it as a whole different thing.  @camstrang is putting in an office, where people come everyday for work. He has relatively predictable expenses and revenue, just as he does now in Winter Park.  In the case of a restaurant or bar, there are many more variables to profitability, from location, to event schedule, to quality of food and number of people passing on the street (not to mention that second floor locations are much harder because nobody passes by on the street.) 

    I'm happy that the space is filled and the area will have more folks coming and going, no matter what the interior looks like (and it sounds like a nice place to work to me.) 

    Thank you. My business is 17 years old, I know what I'm doing haha. The only reason I posted the details about the build-out design is because a lot of the people on this board are interested in architecture and design, and what types of businesses are coming and going. An established media company is replacing a bar. That's notable.

    Our employees are, on average, mid-20s. Very different from the lawyer and bank offices a few blocks away. It's interesting to see the demographic shift on this part of Church, honestly. With Uproar and the co-working spaces on this block, most of the lunchtime foot traffic is trendy kids rather than accountants in suits. To me, that bodes well about the continued evolution of this part of Church. It'll be interesting to watch the next couple of years. 

    9 hours ago, JFW657 said:

    Looks like you might have a halfway decent view of the Tremont Tower construction site.

    If I may be so bold as to make a suggestion/request (that would make you a U.P./Orlando rock star)...

    Maybe set up a webcam in one of your south/west facing windows and point it at the site with a link to it? :rolleyes:

    Just a suggestion.... :whistling:

    :D

    Once it crests 15' we'll have a perfect view of it, and while maybe not mounting a webcam, I'll definitely post regular pics. :rolleyes:

    • Like 2
  2. Quite a presumption you made about my company and staff if you don't think we know what kind of work environment fits our culture and business. We've been in the design and construction process on the new space at 55 W for a year now with plenty of input and buy-in from our team. Everyone's excited about the move, but thanks for your advice.

    [Now remembers why I don't post on this board.]

    • Like 3
  3. Does that mean construction is actually starting? Having to drive by their dirt every day and seeing it just turn into a field of weeds, I've gotten really skeptical about this project ...

  4. There's a red notice on the front door of the sales office announcing a public hearing for a master plan amendment. Does anyone know what the changes are? They've already switched from condos to apartments (though the signage on the sales center still says condos). The rest of the development is retail and office buildings. I'm curious what more they're wanting to change.

  5. Any idea when construction is supposed to start? Since demolition and the remodeling of the sales office this spring, there's no activity. Are they waiting for a certain sales number before construction starts?

  6. Have people in this town never been to New York or London? H&M is a very cool -- and affordable -- clothes store. (Very popular with people under 40.) Like IKEA, it's a destination store that brings European, modern style to the masses, but only with fashion instead of furnishings. Having an H&M in our downtown would be huge. It'd bring people from all over, which is exactly what our downtown needs: destination retail.

  7. I agree with cloudship. Pseudo-old world European architecture would simply add to the fake Disney-esque stigma that Orlando already has. It's not natural, and would have zero historical validity here. The last thing we need is more styrofoam and stucco facades. We're a young city, a new city, and we need to play that up. We can't recreate Soho because that kind of character evolved naturally over the last hundred years, and we can't recreate Paris because that took hundreds more. We have the opportunity of doing something completely new and original, and high tech Tokyo/Barcelona/Beijing kind of world class architecture and outdoor technology would give Orlando something that would truly draw creatives and give us the modern edge that not many U.S. cities (especially in the South) currently have. I own a multimedia company, and I can tell you when I'm trying to move world-class designers here Orlando definitely has a negative stigma. There are pockets of cool (Winter Park, Thornton Park, College Park), but it's still a tough sell. But with the new arena going in, the new PAC, Millenia mall and some of the new downtown proposals we've seen, we have the opportunity to have ultra-modern architecture and a Tokyo-type approach to pushing the envelope redefine our city's vibe. We need more of it. You want to make a creative village? Creative companies want visually stunning spaces to work in. We want modern, modern, modern. Orlando has very few options for these kinds of buildings, and if the city fostered an area of architectural innovation, an area that's funky and completely unconventional, I'd move my company there in a second. If we make a truly innovative creative village, not something that looks like Winter Park Village, Orlando can and will change its national reputation. In 5-10 years there could be a real buzz about the city on the national stage, and I can't wait because it'll make it a lot easier for me to move designers here. :)

  8. well aren't you the optimist. :) first you say we need to build the arena for tourists on I-Drive, and now you're saying we shouldn't pursue getting an MLB team with the Citrus Bowl money because they might leave one day. the only problem is, the list of teams that have changed cities just once is much, much longer than the ones that have changed cities more than once. if there's a real possibility of luring the marlins, i think we should do it. the question is, is it really a possibility?

  9. Well, the city of Orlando has to be a major part of the funding and approval for any arena to be built. And when the mayor of said city is saying things like he is, it's pretty obvious he (and the city commission) won't be part of any plan that doesn't include a downtown arena location. And without the city's involvement and funds, no arena will get built, period. I chalk this "controversy" up to local media trying to create a story that's actually a non-story. That's how they sell papers and get viewers.

    Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer told commissioners the tourism industry supports building all three venues downtown and downplayed talk of putting an arena near International Drive, stressing it's coming from developer Marc Watson alone.

    "I don't think it has a whole lot of traction. At the end of the day, most of our community wants us to do this right, and that means putting all three of these venues downtown," Dyer said after the meeting.

    Full article

  10. Does anybody know what the Magic get for their contribution? Will they own a percentage of the building? Or more importantly, if they pay $43M up front (if that number is accurate) will they still have to pay a lease for using the building?

    If they'd have to pay to use the building, why would the Magic "contribute" anything at all? They'd just be a tenant and it'd be like throwing money away. Now, if for their investment they'd get a percentage ownership in the building or a cut of other revenues generated by the building, I could see the business reason for them investing in it, but if this is just a pure donation and they're still going to have to pay rent, etc., if you look at it from a business perspective, what's in it for them to give anything other than the bare minimum?

  11. It's like some of you think that the only reason they build downtown is to give the cars on I-4 something to look at.

    I think discussing the pros and cons of the architecture of these projects is very valid. There's more to these buildings than just sheer functionality. If that were the case, only efficient, plain, square towers would be built.

    Of course, since this is Orlando, they'd also be short and stumpy. :)

  12. Does anyone else here think that this building is going to look out of place? I think it would fit right at home on the north shore of Eola, not on top of I4 blocking the view like a fat chick standing up in a movie theater

    I'm with you man. I like some aspects of the building, but I can't shake the feeling it's just too wide for its height, especially in that location. Given its proximity to I-4, it's going to be the building that visually defines downtown for decades to come. I just can't help but think a slimmer building, or two buildings, would have been better there. Oh well ...

  13. These were in a PDF that's been circulated for the last year or so. I don't know if the renderings have changed much since this proposal though.

    mn1.jpg

    mn2.jpg

    mn3.jpg

    mn4.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.