Jump to content

uberkarnie

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by uberkarnie

  1. They're also not as familiar with zoning/development procedure as some of us who are more obsessed. Many can't get over that the site is zoned for 30 units, even though that zoning also would allow additional office space. They don't realize that it's an outdated and ridiculous zoning designation from a more suburban focused era. I'm not sure the St Louis based developers were prepared for the blowback, but it's the same design team as before, so they should have been prepared.

  2. 4 hours ago, nashville born said:

    This one has been a saga.  This was one of the first big announcements I was a part of after joining the community.  From the first iteration to the initial protests to the second iteration and even more protests.  If/when this one and Centrum start, I'll pop open an imaginary champagne bottle.

    I think I joined shortly after the Siggy announcement . . . my bottles were drained long ago, not in celebration, but out of impatience. 

    • Haha 3
  3. On 10/7/2021 at 3:07 PM, MagicPotato said:

    Funny how people look at our density statistics and claim Nashville isn't "dense", because of our undeveloped land in the Northwest part of the county. The urban area, arguably, is fairly dense compared to a lot of cities in our peer group. 

    Of the "major*" US cities, only Anchorage, Jacksonville, OKC, Houston, and Phoenix have a larger land area than Nashville. 

    *population over 200K

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  4. I'm on the HWEN board (obviously not commenting in that capacity here) and there seems to be strong opposition to this project. Primary concerns revolve around parking, traffic, density/massing, and stormwater. This plan represents a revision from one we saw last year and this is reflected in the step back in height on the back side of the property and the 10 fewer units from the initial proposal. Many seem to be concerned that the property is currently zoned for no more than 30 units so 180 seems like a huge jump, but there is evidence this spot can handle this development imo. The proposed traffic signal would just be a pedestrian crossing, not a full traffic light. I'm confident this will undergo several more revisions before it begins the zoning process with Metro. This certainly seems like a more thoughtful treatment of the lot than existing buildings between Blair and 440. Many in the neighborhood want expanded affordable housing options; that might be something the developers could use in their favor working towards a compromise.

    • Like 3
  5. I may be incorrect, but I remember hearing when this was announced that the dorms would all be in the primary structure and the tower would be apartments for visiting faculty, guest lecturers, etc.  The University does not currently provide "preferred" housing to wealthier/more prominent students. Housing assignments are based only on a points system assigned by class (1 point per year attended up to 4) with extra half points given to students returning from GEO study abroad programs. The only preferential decision I'm aware of is anecdotal, but I did hear years ago that the card access system on all buildings was implemented as a security measure when one of the Perot children/grandchildren attended in the '90's.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  6. On 2/5/2020 at 12:20 PM, MLBrumby said:

    As an alum it pains me to say this... I’m convinced the BOT is either too stupid/backward or is deliberately undermining the university’s future.  I can not figure out nearly all the decisions the VU BoT makes....regarding their campus plan.... athletics... and the fact their curriculum is still largely aimed at everyone going on to grad school...especially Engineering which I feel is missing a golden opportunity to develop Tech curricula that the new companies moving to Nashville are seeking. I have a unique perspective as I can compare to a similar (competitor) school as an alum of duke. Over the past 15 years it seems Vandy can’t get anything right.... meanwhile even Belmont is coming up with new majors and a modern curriculum that serves the community.  Seems all Vandy wants to do is buy more property and build fancy dorms.

    Is this . . . serious?

    I'd be interested to hear more details about what gives you this impression. I've spent daily time on campus the last couple of years after almost 20 years away. I assure you, the University is far more impressive in nearly every measurable way than it was in the late '90's. Vanderbilt has added new majors and encourages interdisciplinary studies so that most students now graduate with a double major or multiple minors. The campus plan has everything to do with recognizing changing dynamics in higher ed as well as responding to the new level of competition Vanderbilt faces, having raised the University profile dramatically in the last couple of decades. While Belmont is certainly doing good things and making bold changes, they also are facing some serious growing pains. I hope they keep improving, but these two institutions are not comparable. They serve dramatically different purposes. Vanderbilt has made some decisions I disagree with, but the Board is following a long range plan laid out twenty five years ago. The moves have transformed quality of life for the students (the financial aid changes alone have been unbelievably important). University leadership seems to be positioning Vanderbilt to be able to maintain and hopefully expand upon recent success. The campus plan is a big part of this, but overall it goes much deeper than fancy dorms and land banking.

    • Like 4
  7. On 2/19/2019 at 10:18 AM, wreynol4 said:

    Just my opinion, but I don't think the 6 story base for the new buildings at Vanderbilt will be proven to be tall enough.  Seems like 8-10 would have been a better fit.  The footprint of these places is huge and it just seems that a smaller, taller version would have been the answer.

    It's my understanding that scale is an important consideration in the campus redevelopment master plan. They could have solved some existing housing shortages by designing any of the recent projects taller, but the long term goal is about fostering a cohesive architectural environment. I think it will make more sense when this project and Greek Row are finished and designs for the next faze of redevelopment pending demolition of Branscomb, the Morgan/Lewis towers and Chaffin/Mayfield (including the 25th ave garage) are finally released. 

    • Like 2
  8. On 2/1/2019 at 4:50 PM, MLBrumby said:

    And for some reason, I thought 400 Degrees and Bajo Sexto went out of biz. Am I wrong? 

    400 degrees never closed; Aqui has just changed locations a couple of times. She left the third and peabody location a couple of years ago when she bought a building in Bordeaux. She has been running out of a food truck in the parking lot during a long remodel but opened up the inside last year. They have beer on tap now and are located next to the Auto Zone. As far as hot chicken: prince's, 400 degrees, and bolton's are the only hot chicken places in town. The rest . . .  is wrong.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  9. I was able to sample most of the Green Pheasant menu the week prior to open and the food was really good. They were revising some details, but they had decent variety, and I would gladly try any item again. The trout was absolutely stunning; it should be their signature dish. I'm not sure about the interior design, it felt fine when I was the only person there, but I stopped in briefly while they were busy last weekend and can see how the aesthetic might overwhelm some people. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.