Jump to content

austin356

Members
  • Posts

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by austin356

  1. Let the Food World and Winn Dixie die, they suck ass.

    With Mobile's coming 5 years do you guys really think another Walmart (this one prob is not a grocer since is only 130k) will be the very reason these other guys go out of business?

    Even regardless of the fact that I dont care about the Food World or Winn Dixie, I am much more optimistic about about them in Mobile(albeit only for a short time) and with the influx of people. If they cannot coexist with Walmart when Mobile is about to undergo such a massive influx of newbies, then they should die.

  2. Another bridge proposal is mentioned here, although this one by Hank Cobb is unlikely to be considered.

    "From the I-65 merge with I-10 travel straight-line easterly to the Broad Street overpass and (on the straight ahead rising approach ramp) go up and over the McDuffie Coal Terminal, cross the bridge over the tip edge of the mouth of Mobile River, come down over Pinto Island south of the Battleship Alabama and merge into the new Bayway in the center of the Bay."

    This bridge would have river clearance of 360 feet, far higher than the ALDOT proposal, and would not have an adverse affect on the maritime industry or downtown developments. It would cost $800 million-$1 billion, more than the ALDOT proposal.

    Maybe the powers that be should take a look at this...

    You know that would be the tallest river bridge in the world right?

    The largest in the US is the VZ Narrows in NY at 228ft.

  3. I read an article in the paper about how the proposed bridge may affect the cruise business in Mobile. There are already 40 ships that wouldn't fit under the 160 foot span that is now on the drawing boards. The 210 feet that austin mentioned sounds like a better plan. Even though the length of the ships capable of docking at the cruise terminal is also hampered by size of the turn basin, IMO the 160-ft span would be a bigger player in Mobile's chances of getting a bigger ship.

    my goodness they are considering a 160 foot bridge? That is absurdly low and show never be built.

    Regardless of downtown (just imagining this bridge was going up next to nothing) I could never support anything less than 190-200 feet. That would devastate the area, and it should not even be up for consideration.

    All those changes would cost a LOT more than $462 million. I guess I fail to see the big problem with the current locations for the proposed bridge. It looks to be a large suspension type bridge that will have only a few bridge pylons in the ship yard areas. I personally think they are just whining. I'm sure there will be some loss of money and inconvenience, but a couple of bridge pylons isn't going to cause a 50% ($250M) decrease in shipyard revenues.

    They should whine, not about the bridge, but about its proposed height, if the proposal really is 160ft. Maybe they know the 165 route is a no go, and are just trying to position themselves for a compromise which is a more expensive higher bridge.

    And I agree the location really should not matter. It should only be the the overall effects (turn basin and clearance)

    And I also agree, those changes will cost alot more than 462m. Aldot cannot do anything effective for that cheap.

  4. I oppose it being a toll bridge. I agree there needs to be more money spent on surface streets in the city, but this is part of the interstate system.... it doesn't need a toll.

    Well ultimately I think the whole system can and should be tolled. Those of us who use it pay for it, those of us who stay in Midtown and off the highways dont. Thats about as fair as it gets.

    I am tired of subsidizing sprawl.

  5. If it is done, I think it should be like this:

    -Make it a privately owned/leased and operated toll bridge (I am a large proponent of this for a variety of reasons, one must only look to GDOT and TXDOT for our future and that is what they are doing). (tax money is better spent on surface streets or transit, not commuters/tourist/truckers)

    -toll collection site is positioned in the way where nobody going into downtown is tolled (from either bay side) but everyone passing through is.

    -leave causeway and old tunnel and northern bridge as free alternative

    -Use to existing tunnels as only Baldwin-Water St access.

    -assess the feasibility of putting a transit line on the bridge (for future connection MOB BDW)

    -at least 210 ft high clearance (about that of the golden gate) (NO ship higher than that ever will be going up the river past downtown, especially since the docks are basically now at Choctaw point)

    -going ahead and widening the bayway to 4 lanes each way. We must face it, it will happen, its just a matter of when and how.

    -Architectural design competition to be selected by downtown residents/businesses.

    Use any state monies already allocated for project for downtown investment to help offset any negative ramifications associated with bridge and purchase of ferries.

  6. Mobile will look similar to Charlotte just after BOA was complete. RSA will still be the tallest, but some decent sized 3-4 hundred foot condo towers are likely, and will add density fast. Mobile really does not have to complete to many buildings to have a dense skyline because it has such small street blocks that buildings are inherently close together, thus giving the illusion of higher density than a large block grid similar to say Atl if both had the same number and size of buildings.

    Houston will add 150 new buildings downtown in the next 25 years, mostly in the 3-5 hundred foot condo range. And overall will have the most affordable new construction skyrise units in the developed world.

    That will really make it not really comparable to anyone, except maybe Chi town.

    Atlanta will add 150 new buildings in the "intown 3". Most will be luxury office and luxury condos.

    That will make the Midtown/Dtown combo similar to Chi-town pre-current boom.

    Miami is flat out unpredictable because it has soo many variables. It could boom out of control to where it is comparable to any city in the world, or it could fall flat on its ass after this current build out.

    Of course I like everyone else has really no damn clue what will happen, but I could provide reasons why I believe what I wrote some basic estimations as to what the future might look like (most of which is speculation based on policy/demographic/trend analysis)

  7. One question I have for people in the know about T-town........ What is with the taxes? I am hard pressed to find a similar sized city in the deep south with such high taxes (outside of the uppity suburbs of the Ham or Atl)...... I have never paid anything more than 7% sales tax before and here it is 9%, and the property taxes are not low either.

    So my question is, is there a temporary tax that is being used for a special purpose (I would guess a 1% sales tax for school capital improvements) that expires some time, or are the taxes at the current rate permanently?

  8. ^Damn..... Just after Midtown Village? My goodness, I hope the supply is justified by real demand. But with Tuscaloosa having one of the lowest unemployment rates in the world (top couple of %) I would not be surprised. I think Alabama will add 75k new residents this year and a decent fraction of that will be in the T-town area. And combine that with 5% GDP growth and 3-4% real wage growth and you do equal additional demand; but how much I do not know.

  9. personally I wish they would just tear orange grove down and sell the property to a developer that would do something worthy of it. Like the Savannah river landing project. It would be a great opportunity to expand and revitalize the downtown area to the north.
  10. Car Dealership to Move Out of Downtown- More Land Open for Development?

    While the news that yet another business is moving away from downtown Jackson might be greeted with alarm, this should be good news for the city, opeing a significant parcel of land for something better. I hope the land will be used for residential development. Take the opportunity and run with it!

    The Clarion Ledger

  11. I have become gradually less and less impressed by the Trump branded, Woods project. It could easily be a landmark complex, but instead will be lost eventually in Midtown. Hopefully within the next 5-10 years Trump will do something himself and produce something at least the caliber of the Mandarin.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.