Jump to content

Amapper

Members
  • Posts

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Amapper

  1. The Charleston area has over 100,000 new houses in the pipeline which equates to just short of 300,000 people. The Coastal Conservation League continues to fight any new highways, which drive up the cost. All we hear about are buses which will not meet the traffic needs of today, much less 10 to 20 years from now.  The Summerville/Goose Creek area has close to 50,000 houses in the pipeline.

  2. On 3/26/2015 at 10:47 PM, clt29301 said:

    The other news for Mecklenburg is the rate of growth for this time period, over 10%...........not bad for a county of 1m residents.

     

    For other SC Counties.........the Charlotte metro counties are also "killing it".  York is growing at 8.53% and Lancaster is growing at 8.5%.

     

    Metro wise, Charlotte and Charleston are both well above 7% while Greenville and Columbia are in the same 4.50% range. Charlotte is now the 22nd largest metro in the country (2.4m residents), just passing Pittsburgh. 

     

    Growth in the coastal area is mainly driven by retirees.

    1

    Not so in the Charleston area. Thousands of jobs in all areas of work. Volvo 4k and Mercedes Vans 1.5k to name two. There are retirees also but not like Myrtle Beach. Also during that time frame, Boeing added around 7k.

  3. Shortly after Boeing announced it's decision to locate an assembly line at the airport in North Charleston, a consultant was hired to make suggested highway improvements. They came in at about 150 million dollars. I read recently the local governments had put in a 300+ million dollar request to the state infrastructure bank for improvements in the area of the airport. Not much chance of that happening.

  4. The Air Force, which owns the two runways at Charleston International, plans to tear both up in the next few years and rebuild them from scratch, a job estimated to cost $80 million. Airport officials said the refurbishment is the perfect time to stretch the shorter strip to 9,000 feet from 7,000 and the longer one to 10,500 feet from 9,000. Economic development officials said a runway of 10,000 feet or more is almost essential to landing another major aerospace manufacturer such as the two suppliers � Vought Aircraft Industries Inc. and Global Aeronautica � that are making pieces of the Boeing Co.'s new 787 passenger jet on airport property. Of course, the issue is (as it always is) "How do we pay for it?" The airport needs to snag $30 million from the FAA to make this happen.

    The short runway has now been rebuilt and the main runway is soon to be closed for an 8 month rebuild. Unfortunately neither has been lengthened. We did land Boeing's second 787 assembly line without the longer runway. Now the the roadways around the airport need to be expanded badly.

  5. And by this time, it should be known that CHS, along with GSP, has landed Southwest Airlines with service set to begin within the year. The decision should have been a no-brainer for Southwest, given how large of a tourist destination Charleston is. I just hope the locals will support Southwest and not ditch it for the legacy carriers who will lower their fares to compete.

    I agree, and hope folks remember how they jacked up prices as soon as Air Tran left. One thing that concerns me is while GSP announced a 100 million addition after SW made their decision to start service there, we've seen no movement on CHS's part to accommodate SW. I wonder it Charleston realizes what will happen to it's passenger traffic. I hope they don't blow this.

  6. It's amazing that the Columbia area has kept the lowest unemployment rate and sold the most homes during the last two years, what with the numbers on manufacturing losses.

    Good question. The answer is simple: state capital. Government is about the only sector of the economy that has been growing and capitals, state and national, are often insulated from the worst of economic downturns.

  7. As mentioned above, Boeing's comments may be just a lever to use against the machinists union in Washington state. Reminds me a little of when Mercedes was looking at Charleston and Savannah for an assembly plant right at a time they were in talks with their Canadian union members. They eventually "picked" Savannah but never built the plant. I hope this time is not the same deal, and Boeing expands their North Charleston complex. It already employs a combined workforce of over 2000.

  8. Charleston, SC seems to be heading towards creating two transit lines using existing railway tracks. One from Summerville to downtown and another from Moncks Corner/Goose Creek to downtown. Express bus routes have been so successful that they are being extended to Summerville, which bodes well for a a rail line to be established.

  9. He's talking MSA-wise, and according the the Census Bureau's projections through 2030, I say no. Their projections show the Columbia MSA extending its lead.

    I may be wrong, but some of the Columbia MSA population growth might be due to an increase in it's geographic area. For instance, the Greenville/Spartanburg MSA to a big population leap when (they) added the Anderson area. It would be like adding Myrtle Beach to Charleston's figures. We'd go from 620K to over 900K.

    With approximately 135,000 homes in the pipeline, the Charleston area is looking at adding (conservatively) 300,000 new residents in the next 20 years or so, assuming the Coastal Conservation League doesn't completely shut down the coasts economy.

  10. I just don't like it when people post reports that show some cities to be better off than others in South Carolina. Can't all of our cities be equally represented and not stomped on with these reports? All these studies do is cause debates that say "my city is better than yours because...."

    I certainly understand your concerns there, but a little hometown pride and bragging is fine, as long as it doesn't cross the line into actually putting someone elses city down. At the same time, I would hope the same person would be able to rejoice with others when their communities land a big one, so to speak. Because no matter where a large commercial or industrial development lands, it usually spills over into the rest of the state somehow.

    Living in the Charleston area, I can see how our port has benefited from Greenville/Spartanburg having BMW. We have even had a few suppliers locate here as a result.

    From what I have seen in my short time in this forum, most areas in SC have reason to crow. There seems to be good things happening on the development front all around.

  11. While I am excited about Google coming to Chas and Cola, I am fairly disappointed that they're building facilities far beyond the urban core of both areas. For Chas, why didn't Google consider the Cainhoy or West Ashley sections of Chas? Even Johns Island? In Cola, why didn't they go to Cayce or SE Cola (along Garners Ferry, 12th Street, or SC 48)? It's incredible that state leaders will just let them build anywhere in this state, without any foresight into the impacts of additional suburban development on the metro areas. Are we that desperate?

    These facilities are literally being built in the boonies.

    In addition to the answers already given, I would add that the "center" of the metro area is and has been shifting north and west through North Charleston up to the Summerville-Goose Creek-Moncks Corner triangle. That is where the bulk of the available land is. With the amount of people moving into the state over the next few decades it is unrealistic to think the boundaries

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.